Turn on thread page Beta

Are those who attend imperial far more academically superior than those at oxbridge watch

Announcements
    • Section Leader
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    (Original post by GradeA*UnderA)
    I'm aware the PAT is, I meant it relative to Oxford's other entrance exams like TSA or HAT. Particularly TSA, as its general aptitude.

    Agreed, but surely offer chance plays into how rigourous an admissions process is? At least as much as post offer interview rate? More factors go in to getting an offer too, including interview, which, depending on the scaling of said factors adds to "rigour". Their offer rates are similar.
    (Ignore medicine! It's an outlier for all universities.)

    If you want to compare like for like, the 4 year Chemistry MSci at Imperial has a 55% offer rate.

    The point is that Imperial is not really using the interview as a key tool in selection (except medicine). Unlike Oxbridge. So their applications process can't be as rigorous, or more correctly, as thorough. I honestly don't know the basis of selection that imperial *does* use when offering... I guess it's the PS & Reference (inc predictions)...

    Actually I wonder if they put more emphasis on GCSEs, which aren't that important for either Cambridge or Oxford. Despite what people think about Oxbridge.

    And for the avoidance of doubt, this doesn't mean that the interview is the most important factor for Oxbridge, it isn't. But it does add useful information to their holistic assesment of applicants.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by GradeA*UnderA)
    Not necessarily if you live in London, want more job connections, have a scholarship to go to Imperial, want to do engineering.

    Because according to CUG, Imperial Chem Eng students have the highest UCAS tarrif for that subject. It inevitably means some rejected Oxbridge.
    Small exceptions which influence a small minority of those students’ decisions. In the overwhelmingly standard case, people choose Oxbridge over imperial.
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by D3LLI5)
    Small exceptions which influence a small minority of those students’ decisions. In the overwhelmingly standard case, people choose Oxbridge over imperial.
    Engineers and scholars are a pretty decent portion of Imperial.

    Give them a couple hundred years. They've already caught up by a few hundred
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Doonesbury)
    (Ignore medicine! It's an outlier for all universities.)

    If you want to compare like for like, the 4 year Chemistry MSci at Imperial has a 55% offer rate.

    The point is that Imperial is not really using the interview as a key tool in selection (except medicine). Unlike Oxbridge. So their applications process can't be as rigorous, or more correctly, as thorough. I honestly don't know the basis of selection that imperial *does* use when offering... I guess it's the PS & Reference (inc predictions)...

    Actually I wonder if they put more emphasis on GCSEs, which aren't that important for either Cambridge or Oxford. Despite what people think about Oxbridge.

    And for the avoidance of doubt, this doesn't mean that the interview is the most important factor for Oxbridge, it isn't. But it does add useful information to their holistic assesment of applicants.
    Imperial's admissions are essentially:

    - Be predicted AAA, if less, I think it's practically auto rejection no matter what (maybe mitigating circumstances apply). Granted, your chances aren't good if you're predictions are below the requirements.

    - for more competive courses, have good GCSEs/PS or stronger predictions with a good entrance exam score.

    - for most courses, GCSEs don't matter. In medicine they aren't considered at all for example.

    - They tend to reject a lot of applicants who don't have a third science A Level for some subjects, and they hide it in their FAQ page smh. This is even if they have max predictions and meet subject requirements.

    They were routinely giving people with eg ABB at AS Level, with AAA predictions offers of A*A*A to which they never really met, it's a bit like Warwick with maths, they just offer alot to see who makes it I guess. The average student there with best 3 A Levels has A*A*A, so it seems they keep them out, even if they miss it.

    Perhaps Oxbridge weight interviews more because there's often an admissions test done with them? Literally at the interview.
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    you might as well call it Plantation College

    smh
    lmaooooo well aint that the gospel truth
    Offline

    4
    ReputationRep:
    I know of two inspirational people who both ended up in imperial uni, one of them became a professor and is working in genetic engineering the other works at cern Hadron Collider. Imperial dishes out the very best. Try your best to get in there my friend. Good luck
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    No, cant base someones academic abilities based on which unis they go to
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by GradeA*UnderA)
    Imperial's admissions are essentially:

    They were routinely giving people with eg ABB at AS Level, with AAA predictions offers of A*A*A to which they never really met, it's a bit like Warwick with maths, they just offer alot to see who makes it I guess. The average student there with best 3 A Levels has A*A*A, so it seems they keep them out, even if they miss it.
    Really not true. Warwick is well known to give offers to every any anybody who applies regardless of their predicted grades, however other top universities are much different. And here's one for Physics.



    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by GradeA*UnderA)
    Imperial's admissions are essentially:

    - Be predicted AAA, if less, I think it's practically auto rejection no matter what (maybe mitigating circumstances apply). Granted, your chances aren't good if you're predictions are below the requirements.

    - for more competive courses, have good GCSEs/PS or stronger predictions with a good entrance exam score.

    - for most courses, GCSEs don't matter. In medicine they aren't considered at all for example.

    - They tend to reject a lot of applicants who don't have a third science A Level for some subjects, and they hide it in their FAQ page smh. This is even if they have max predictions and meet subject requirements.

    They were routinely giving people with eg ABB at AS Level, with AAA predictions offers of A*A*A to which they never really met, it's a bit like Warwick with maths, they just offer alot to see who makes it I guess. The average student there with best 3 A Levels has A*A*A, so it seems they keep them out, even if they miss it.

    Perhaps Oxbridge weight interviews more because there's often an admissions test done with them? Literally at the interview.
    Do you have any evidence to back up what you have said? Imperial and Warwick are miles part in the selectivity of their students.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Academically, they're probably on the same level. But I guarantee you the vast majority of Imperial attendees are Oxbridge rejects.
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pidge Gunderson)
    Academically, they're probably on the same level. But I guarantee you the vast majority of Imperial attendees are Oxbridge rejects.
    I will be able to give anecdotal evidence to this soon
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by KingBach12)
    Do you have any evidence to back up what you have said? Imperial and Warwick are miles part in the selectivity of their students.
    Look on the chemistry for Imperial applicants last year.

    If I didn't make it clear, thats where I was basing my experience since I'm a chem applicant.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    This is a dumb question. If anything it is likely the other way round, since the majority of UK students aim to apply to Oxbridge primarily.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    Lol, literally how many times are we going to masturbate over this?
 
 
 
Poll
Do you think parents should charge rent?
Useful resources
Uni match

Applying to uni?

Our tool will help you find the perfect course

Articles:

Debate and current affairs guidelinesDebate and current affairs wiki

Quick link:

Educational debate unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.