Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Attachment 697258
    Not sure how to go about answering this question and whether it requires parameterization. I need to evaluate the line integral of  (y-y^2)i + (x-2xy)j +k where c is two line segments from (0,1) to (2,1) and from (2,1) to (2,3), picture above
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BinaryJava)
    Attachment 697258
    Not sure how to go about answering this question and whether it requires parameterization. I need to evaluate the line integral of  (y-y^2)i + (x-2xy)j +k where c is two line segments from (0,1) to (2,1) and from (2,1) to (2,3), picture above
    This doesn't seem to need any parameterisation. You have a line of constant y followed by a line of constant x, so along the first line, you can substitute in the value of y and integrate against x, and vice versa for the second.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by atsruser)
    This doesn't seem to need any parameterisation. You have a line of constant y followed by a line of constant x, so along the first line, you can substitute in the value of y and integrate against x, and vice versa for the second.
    But you need to know what the "d..." bit is, surely? If it's an integral w.r.t. ds, for example, this would be quite different from a ".dr" integral, for example.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DFranklin)
    But you need to know what the "d..." bit is, surely? If it's an integral w.r.t. ds, for example, this would be quite different from a ".dr" integral, for example.
    From the limited part of the question that I could see, I guessed that it's a .d\bold{r}
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Name:  bea9e431da2e2483a752c4d5ba3b3b55.png
Views: 12
Size:  28.7 KB

    (Original post by atsruser)
    From the limited part of the question that I could see, I guessed that it's a .d\bold{r}
    Yes its a dr, do you split it into two parts?
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BinaryJava)
    Yes its a dr, do you split it into two parts?
    Yes, you split it into 2 parts.

    e.g. for the first part, we have r going from (0, 1) to (2, 1). For notation later, call this part of the curve C_1

    You ask if this requires parameterization; you can "kind of " avoid parameterization by using the x-coordinate itself as a parameterization, but until you are confident with what is going on, I would use a formal parameterization.

    So parameterize with t; we want r = (0, 1) when t =0 and (2, 1) when t = 1, so we can write r = (2t, 1).

    Then you can rewrite \displaystyle \int_{C_1} {\bf F . dr} as \displaystyle\int_{t=0}^{t=1} {\bf F .} \dfrac{d{\bf r}}{dt}\, dt, which will leave you with a standard (A-level style) integral.

    Do the same thing for the 2nd part of the curve and then add them together.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DFranklin)
    Yes, you split it into 2 parts.

    e.g. for the first part, we have r going from (0, 1) to (2, 1). For notation later, call this part of the curve C_1

    You ask if this requires parameterization; you can "kind of " avoid parameterization by using the x-coordinate itself as a parameterization, but until you are confident with what is going on, I would use a formal parameterization.

    So parameterize with t; we want r = (0, 1) when t =0 and (2, 1) when t = 1, so we can write r = (2t, 1).

    Then you can rewrite \displaystyle \int_{C_1} {\bf F . dr} as \displaystyle\int_{t=0}^{t=1} {\bf F .} \dfrac{d{\bf r}}{dt}\, dt, which will leave you with a standard (A-level style) integral.

    Do the same thing for the 2nd part of the curve and then add them together.
    I will give that a crack tomorrow, out of interest how would the non parametrization work?
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by BinaryJava)
    I will give that a crack tomorrow, out of interest how would the non parametrization work?
    You are integrating along lines of constant x and constant y, so you can set x and y to the appropriate constant and integrate against the other variable. For practice though I would agree that it's best just to parameterise.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.