You are Here: Home >< Maths

# Vector Integral Notation/ Substition question watch

1. (Apologies vector intergral may not be the terminology here)

So I am looking at a subsituton of the form:

where

I just want to check I have some definitions correct and why we need the factor cubed correct, since I've always took this integral notation for granted.

So just to confirm that ?

So therefore I have

Now explicitly, most likely this is a question/answer on notation, if I was to write it out in (unecessary ) detail, what would the next line(or two) be before getting:

2. (Original post by nologiceretoday)
(Apologies vector intergral may not be the terminology here)

So I am looking at a subsituton of the form:

where

I just want to check I have some definitions correct and why we need the factor cubed correct, since I've always took this integral notation for granted.

So just to confirm that ?
This doesn't look at all right. You seem to be mixing up a volume element with the differential of a vector. It's like confusing with

I guess that you are trying to represent a volume element in k-space for a quantum particle in a 3D box of size so you have:

where the come from the requirement that the wave function goes to 0 at the sides of the box, and then we would have:

So unless I'm confused, you seem to have the reciprocal of the correct constant, and an extra factor of 2 - that may come from your box, I guess, if you have
3. (Original post by atsruser)
This doesn't look at all right. You seem to be mixing up a volume element with the differential of a vector. It's like confusing with

I guess that you are trying to represent a volume element in k-space for a quantum particle in a 3D box of size so you have:

where the come from the requirement that the wave function goes to 0 at the sides of the box, and then we would have:

So unless I'm confused, you seem to have the reciprocal of the correct constant, and an extra factor of 2 - that may come from your box, I guess, if you have
ok thank you I guess that would make more sense.

But the notation is inconsistent then? As in we don't write [tex] d \vec{V} [/tex[ when we are concerned with this volume element.

I wouldnt have thought you'd use the vector notation for any sort of volume element?
4. (Original post by nologiceretoday)
But the notation is inconsistent then? As in we don't write [tex] d \vec{V} [/tex[ when we are concerned with this volume element.

I wouldnt have thought you'd use the vector notation for any sort of volume element?
I'm not exactly sure to what you're referring but here are two short threads on volume notation that may be helpful:

https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...ntial-notation

https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...ments-notation

As far as I can tell, the notation for volume elements is pretty variable and non-standard, and differs between maths and physics, and in physics, between different branches.

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: October 22, 2017
Today on TSR

### He broke up with me because of long distance

Now I'm moving to his city

### University open days

Wed, 25 Jul '18
2. University of Buckingham
Wed, 25 Jul '18
3. Bournemouth University
Wed, 1 Aug '18
Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams