Go to first unread
Back
to top
Do you believe that the death penalty is an effective deterrent for crime?
Watch
Announcements
Poll: Do you believe the death penalty is an effective deterrent for crime?
Yes
(15)
37.5%
No
(25)
62.5%
Report
#2
Nope nope, anyone doing a crime which has the risk of the death penalty wouldn't care in the first place.
0
reply
Report
#3
Not really. A lot of people who do these horrible crimes don't think (or care about) the penalties. In the case of mass-shooters, they usually shoot themselves anyway.
My main problem with the death penalty is that the legal system isn't perfect and people get sentenced wrongly sometimes. It's bad enough being sent to prison for something you didn't do, but being accidentally executed is far worse in my opinion.
My main problem with the death penalty is that the legal system isn't perfect and people get sentenced wrongly sometimes. It's bad enough being sent to prison for something you didn't do, but being accidentally executed is far worse in my opinion.
0
reply
Report
#4
(Original post by Golyhawhaw)
Nope nope, anyone doing a crime which has the risk of the death penalty wouldn't care in the first place.
Nope nope, anyone doing a crime which has the risk of the death penalty wouldn't care in the first place.
0
reply
Report
#5
(Original post by Placeboo123)
Isn't there then also the other side who would care for death penalty, however, since it's not in place they'd go ahead with their crime?
Isn't there then also the other side who would care for death penalty, however, since it's not in place they'd go ahead with their crime?
0
reply
Report
#6
(Original post by Golyhawhaw)
You make a fair point but I personally can't see someone who say is a child-killer or serial killer caring about the consequences.
You make a fair point but I personally can't see someone who say is a child-killer or serial killer caring about the consequences.
Besides, why exactly would you like to spare a child-killer's life?
0
reply
Report
#7
What does the evidence say?
Do countries with the death penalty have a significantly lower rate of crime?
Do countries with the death penalty have a significantly lower rate of crime?
1
reply
Report
#8
even if does not deter criminals we should still have the death penalty... clearly prison does not deter criminals but we still have prison don't we ?
1
reply
Report
#9
(Original post by Placeboo123)
I'd disagree, I think that a lot of these 'people' simply become comfortable with the idea of prison and don't particularly see it as punishment but a way of life. Whereas if that life were to be under threat their actions would potentially be different.
Besides, why exactly would you like to spare a child-killer's life?
I'd disagree, I think that a lot of these 'people' simply become comfortable with the idea of prison and don't particularly see it as punishment but a way of life. Whereas if that life were to be under threat their actions would potentially be different.
Besides, why exactly would you like to spare a child-killer's life?
0
reply
Report
#10
(Original post by IamJacksContempt)
And some people would prefer death to life imprisonment, so what's your point?
And some people would prefer death to life imprisonment, so what's your point?
2
reply
Report
#11
(Original post by 999tigger)
What does the evidence say?
Do countries with the death penalty have a significantly lower rate of crime?
What does the evidence say?
Do countries with the death penalty have a significantly lower rate of crime?
http://www.nationmaster.com/country-...d-States/Crime
0
reply
Report
#12
Belief doesn't have much to do with it. From what I can tell, there is no evidence that the death penalty is a better deterrent than other penalties, and other sentences clearly also have better outcomes for the criminals. You can't rehabilitate someone after you've executed them.
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11982
https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...page&q&f=false
^ pages 152-155 are pertinent
http://www.nber.org/papers/w11982
https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=...page&q&f=false
^ pages 152-155 are pertinent
0
reply
Report
#13
(Original post by the bear)
even if does not deter criminals we should still have the death penalty... clearly prison does not deter criminals but we still have prison don't we ?
even if does not deter criminals we should still have the death penalty... clearly prison does not deter criminals but we still have prison don't we ?
0
reply
Report
#14
Quite simply NO, Lifetime is prison is a much more daunting task than the kop out that is a lethal injection, death Penalty should be made available for small crimes as a deterrent to be more effective and jail should be for more serious crimes
0
reply
Report
#15
(Original post by Placeboo123)
My point is that I don't feel any sympathy for remorseless criminals and would prefer my tax money to be allocated into education or the NHS as oppose to feeding and accommodating useless despicable individuals.
My point is that I don't feel any sympathy for remorseless criminals and would prefer my tax money to be allocated into education or the NHS as oppose to feeding and accommodating useless despicable individuals.
0
reply
Report
#16
(Original post by Placeboo123)
I'd disagree, I think that a lot of these 'people' simply become comfortable with the idea of prison and don't particularly see it as punishment but a way of life. Whereas if that life were to be under threat their actions would potentially be different.
Besides, why exactly would you like to spare a child-killer's life?
I'd disagree, I think that a lot of these 'people' simply become comfortable with the idea of prison and don't particularly see it as punishment but a way of life. Whereas if that life were to be under threat their actions would potentially be different.
Besides, why exactly would you like to spare a child-killer's life?
0
reply
Report
#17
(Original post by Placeboo123)
My point is that I don't feel any sympathy for remorseless criminals and would prefer my tax money to be allocated into education or the NHS as oppose to feeding and accommodating useless despicable individuals.
My point is that I don't feel any sympathy for remorseless criminals and would prefer my tax money to be allocated into education or the NHS as oppose to feeding and accommodating useless despicable individuals.
The death penalty is imposed disproportionately on people marginalised socially, politically and economically. Race, creed, the poor, uneducated, low intelligence, drug use, all appear as statistically significant in capital punishment sentencing.
May as well call it social and ethnic cleansing (which it will no doubt be portrayed) by those with a socio-political agenda.
1
reply
Report
#18
For me, it's definitely a no.
I personally believe it raises all sorts of ethical issues. So a case is brought in front of a judge and jury. They decide to sentence the accused to death. But what if they get it wrong? A recent study released in the "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences" shows us that the number of wrongful deaths is incredibly high compared to the myth that people believe. Perhaps this isn't a strong enough argument to abolish the death penalty entirely, but put yourself in the shoes of someone sentenced to death's family member who suddenly finds out that the deceased is innocent. I don't think I can truly put into words how I imagine that would feel.
As aforementioned by multiple others in this thread, there is also little evidence to prove that it acts as a strong deterrent. My personal opinion is that if people have it in them to take another's life, then they're going to do that. There is nothing that can change the mind of someone set on murder; I don't believe for a second that they fear the consequences. Perhaps fear is the wrong word. Understand the consequences? Know that there will be consequences? A lot of criminals believe that they've covered their tracks so maybe they believe that they will not get into trouble.
One final note is one from my own morals, and thus I cannot back it up with statistics. For me, it is a case of humanity. If I was the one sentencing people to death, I don't think I could live with myself. Surely it comes full circle and then I am also a murderer? If the underlying foundations for the death penalty is to punish people who have taken lives they had no right to take, does the whole thing not seem somewhat ironic?
Anyway, that's my opinion.
I personally believe it raises all sorts of ethical issues. So a case is brought in front of a judge and jury. They decide to sentence the accused to death. But what if they get it wrong? A recent study released in the "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences" shows us that the number of wrongful deaths is incredibly high compared to the myth that people believe. Perhaps this isn't a strong enough argument to abolish the death penalty entirely, but put yourself in the shoes of someone sentenced to death's family member who suddenly finds out that the deceased is innocent. I don't think I can truly put into words how I imagine that would feel.
As aforementioned by multiple others in this thread, there is also little evidence to prove that it acts as a strong deterrent. My personal opinion is that if people have it in them to take another's life, then they're going to do that. There is nothing that can change the mind of someone set on murder; I don't believe for a second that they fear the consequences. Perhaps fear is the wrong word. Understand the consequences? Know that there will be consequences? A lot of criminals believe that they've covered their tracks so maybe they believe that they will not get into trouble.
One final note is one from my own morals, and thus I cannot back it up with statistics. For me, it is a case of humanity. If I was the one sentencing people to death, I don't think I could live with myself. Surely it comes full circle and then I am also a murderer? If the underlying foundations for the death penalty is to punish people who have taken lives they had no right to take, does the whole thing not seem somewhat ironic?
Anyway, that's my opinion.
0
reply
Report
#19
yes we should be able to relieve our emotional insecurities by ending the lives of criminals, such is morally sound.
1
reply
Report
#20
I think that it can be effective, but it'd need to be implemented for the most heinous crimes; often when the criminal shows no remorse or clearly shows signs of re offending.
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
Today on TSR
-
Best Cyber-Monday dealsCatch up with the top student offers
- Anxiety about uni rejections
- Nasty housemate - what should I do?
- Messed up by predicted grades
- Too easy to fall out of love