Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    This is supposed to be a physics question, But maybe the Mathematicians could help out.

    The height of the water on a beach can be approximated as simple harmonic motion with a period of 12hours. If the mean water height is 3.5m, the amplitude of the tide is 1.6m, and `high water' occurs at 7am one day, what would you predict the height of the water to be at 11am?

    I used the equation, x=Acos(w)t But couldnt get the Answer
    w is angular frequency
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    Your equation should include a constant offset for the (given) mean water height. If that doesn’t fix it please post your working.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    Can u post ur working out? Its the easiest way to see where u made a mistake so we can work to fix it.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    8
    ReputationRep:
    Is t not supposed to be inside the bracket next to w?
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Shaanv)
    Can u post ur working out? Its the easiest way to see where u made a mistake so we can work to fix it.
    Sorry for late reply, i hadnt seen a notification so i thought no one replied to the post.

    my working:

    Amplitude =1.6
    Time Period=12hours*3600(to convert to seconds)
    time elapsed=4 hours

    x=Acos(2pi/T)t
    x=1.6cos(2pi/(12*3600)* (4*3600)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by H3n)
    Is t not supposed to be inside the bracket next to w?
    I dont think so, but ill try that
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by old_engineer)
    Your equation should include a constant offset for the (given) mean water height. If that doesn’t fix it please post your working.
    im not sure what you mean by constant offset
    • TSR Support Team
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joyoustele)
    I dont think so, but ill try that
    It is supposed to be inside the bracket

    Edit: This definitely belongs in Physics, not Maths! I’ve moved it across.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Omg lol OCR A question? I did that one yesterday 😂😂😂
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Protostar)
    It is supposed to be inside the bracket

    Edit: This definitely belongs in Physics, not Maths! I’ve moved it across.
    I tried it, it didnt work
    • TSR Support Team
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joyoustele)
    I tried it, it didnt work
    Your calculator is in radians right? I haven’t actually tried the question myself but surely it must work...
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joyoustele)
    I tried it, it didnt work
    U can keep everything in hours as thats what all the relevant measurements are going to be in. The equilibrium position is at 3.5m.

    So if u imagine a graph of Acos(wt) in this situation it would not suffice as the equilibrium point is 0 not 3.5, so ur equation should be along the lines of Acos(wt) + 3.5
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Protostar)
    Your calculator is in radians right? I haven’t actually tried the question myself but surely it must work...
    It is in radians. Have you seen my working? is that correct?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Shaanv)
    U can keep everything in hours as thats what all the relevant measurements are going to be in. The equilibrium position is at 3.5m.

    So if u imagine a graph of Acos(wt) in this situation it would not suffice as the equilibrium point is 0 not 3.5, so ur equation should be along the lines of Acos(wt) + 3.5
    Oh wow, It worked Thanks so much.
    • TSR Support Team
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by joyoustele)
    It is in radians. Have you seen my working? is that correct?
    I think that you need to take the 3.5m into account - this is effectively the equilibrium position and so the amplitude will be 1.6m above the 3.5m. So you’d have to add this on somewhere?
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    Did TEF Bronze Award affect your UCAS choices?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.