You are Here: Home >< Maths

Fibonacci sequence watch

1. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...63/unknown.png

I found the formula for the sum for this sequence and it turns out to be

So i tried to add the 2 numbers you see there and get 288 and take 1 you get 287 but of course this isn't the right number

so i decided to find the general solution which happened to be

and the 12th term happens to be 377 and i took 1 off of this and it's still wrong, i don't get where i'm going wrong.
2. (Original post by will'o'wisp2)
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...63/unknown.png

I found the formula for the sum for this sequence and it turns out to be

So i tried to add the 2 numbers you see there and get 288 and take 1 you get 287 but of course this isn't the right number

so i decided to find the general solution which happened to be

and the 12th term happens to be 377 and i took 1 off of this and it's still wrong, i don't get where i'm going wrong.
so you need in the Fibonacci number formula.

Why do they say that ...? That's not right.

and

Did you derive the correct relation for ?
3. It's possible there's some confusion between "nth term" and , given they start the series with .

That said, under their definitions we get the sum

1+1+2+3+5+8+13+21+34+55+89+144=3 76

I can't really see how that's debatable (i.e. if there is confusion, it's them who are confused...)
4. Your expression for is correct and your answer is definitely correct, if the value for was indeed a typo. I'm not sure how you could possible get on the off-chance it's not a typo though...
5. (Original post by RDKGames)
so you need in the Fibonacci number formula.

Why do they say that ...? That's not right.

and

Did you derive the correct relation for ?
sorry i meant that the 14th term is actually 377 my bad. The 12th term si actually 144 tho but the 13th term certainly isn't 144 i was confused by that too which is why i got the general solution.

But i have no idea how to derive that , hence i used this "trusty" site and found it out.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-su...bonacci-series
6. Couple of notes: you're not "supposed" to just add it up, but note that it only really takes a few seconds to do this by hand. Worth remembering when you need to do this in an exam.

Similarly, the formula you give is probably more hassle than it's worth until about the 377 term.

Finally, for n > 2 (or so), you can ignore the 2nd term in the formula and instead just pick the closest integer to the 1st term. Saves time + effort.
7. (Original post by DFranklin)
It's possible there's some confusion between "nth term" and , given they start the series with .

That said, under their definitions we get the sum

1+1+2+3+5+8+13+21+34+55+89+144=3 76

I can't really see how that's debatable (i.e. if there is confusion, it's them who are confused...)
HOLY MOLEY I WAS RIGHT? What is this, a miracle?
(Original post by _gcx)
Your expression for is correct and your answer is definitely correct, if the value for was indeed a typo. I'm not sure how you could possible get on the off-chance it's not a typo though...
HAHA LOL YOU THOUGHT IT WAS A TYPO? LOOK AGAIN

(btw i had to refresh the page so different numbers came up)
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...00/unknown.png
(Original post by DFranklin)
Couple of notes: you're not "supposed" to just add it up, but note that it only really takes a few seconds to do this by hand. Worth remembering when you need to do this in an exam.

Similarly, the formula you give is probably more hassle than it's worth until about the 377 term.

Finally, for n > 2 (or so), you can ignore the 2nd term in the formula and instead just pick the closest integer to the 1st term. Saves time + effort.
not quite sure i understand this
8. (Original post by will'o'wisp2)
HOLY MOLEY I WAS RIGHT? What is this, a miracle?

HAHA LOL YOU THOUGHT IT WAS A TYPO? LOOK AGAIN

(btw i had to refresh the page so different numbers came up)
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...00/unknown.png

not quite sure i understand this
The only way that could possibly make sense would be if except when , where , which would be pretty weird.
9. (Original post by will'o'wisp2)
not quite sure i understand this
e.g.

n = 10, = 55.0036361...; nearest integer is 55.

n = 20, = 6,765.0000296...; nearest integer is 6765
10. (Original post by DFranklin)
e.g.

n = 10, = 55.0036361...; nearest integer is 55.

n = 20, = 6,765.0000296...; nearest integer is 6765
Oh so it gives quite a good accurate approximation

Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: October 25, 2017
The home of Results and Clearing

1,064

people online now

1,567,000

students helped last year
Today on TSR

University open days

1. Sheffield Hallam University
Tue, 21 Aug '18
2. Bournemouth University
Wed, 22 Aug '18
3. University of Buckingham
Thu, 23 Aug '18
Poll
Useful resources

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Chat with other maths applicants