Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    The statement

    "For every prime x there is a larger prime y"

    which translates to (P is the set of primes)

    \forall x \in \mathbb P\ \exists\ y \in \mathbb P\ s.t\ y>x

    I'm proposing that you can switch y>x and y \in \mathbb P and that this version is the same as the one up above.

    However my teacher said that this is incorrect why so?
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    15
    Study Helper
    (Original post by will'o'wisp2)
    The statement

    "For every prime x there is a larger prime y"

    which translates to (P is the set of primes)

    \forall x \in \mathbb P\ \exists\ y \in \mathbb P\ s.t\ y>x

    I'm proposing that you can switch y>x and y \in \mathbb P and that this version is the same as the one up above.

    However my teacher said that this is incorrect why so?
    The scope of the quantifier follows the quantifier. It's part of the logical sentence syntax.

    If you make the change you suggest the y in y>x will not be constrained by the existential quantifier, and the quantifier would be left hanging at the end. Just doesn't make sense.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    The scope of the quantifier follows the quantifier. It's part of the logical sentence syntax.

    If you make the change you suggest the y in y>x will not be constrained by the existential quantifier, and the quantifier would be left hanging at the end. Just doesn't make sense.
    took me a long time but i understand i think, so you read it like a sentence from left to right and it makes no sense if you state what y is before you define what it is right?
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    15
    Study Helper
    (Original post by will'o'wisp2)
    took me a long time but i understand i think, so you read it like a sentence from left to right
    Yes.

    and it makes no sense if you state what y is before you define what it is right?
    I think it best to say, if you're intending to define a variable, you must do so before you use it. And leave it at that.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Yes.



    I think it best to say, if you're intending to define a variable, you must do so before you use it. And leave it at that.
    ye just what i meant(maybe not what i said xD) thanks man
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: November 1, 2017

University open days

  1. University of Bradford
    University-wide Postgraduate
    Wed, 25 Jul '18
  2. University of Buckingham
    Psychology Taster Tutorial Undergraduate
    Wed, 25 Jul '18
  3. Bournemouth University
    Clearing Campus Visit Undergraduate
    Wed, 1 Aug '18
Poll
How are you feeling in the run-up to Results Day 2018?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.