Turn on thread page Beta

B1302 - Abortion (amendment) bill 2017 watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    B1302 - Abortion (amendment) bill 2017, JoecPhillips MP



    A
    BILL TO
    Amend the abortion act based on modern day viability


    BE IT ENACTED by The Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Commons in this present Parliament assembled, in accordance with the provisions of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, and by the authority of the same, as follows:—

    1-Amendments
    (1) In Section 1(1) of the Abortion Act 1967 replace twenty-fourth with twenty-first


    2- Citation and commencement
    (1) This Act extends to the United Kingdom.
    (2) The provisions of this Act come into force on Royal Assent
    (3) This Act may be referred to as the Abortion (Amendment) Act 2017

    Notes:
    The Abortion limit is 24 weeks based on viability however this was set in 1990 and science and technology has advanced since then with children born at 21 weeks surviving http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...e-parents.html

    This bill moves the limit to the point of viability.

    Legislation

    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    No, the point of viability should not be used as a reference for abortion because medical advancements will keep reducing that limit. Abortion should be up to the stage where the foetus is neither aware of what is happening to it nor can the foetus feel pain.
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jacob E)
    No, the point of viability should not be used as a reference for abortion because medical advancements will keep reducing that limit. Abortion should be up to the stage where the foetus is neither aware of what is happening to it nor can feel pain.
    This
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Nay, for the reasons stated.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Again its a nay
    • Wiki Support Team
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Wiki Support Team
    Nope, I can't say I care too much about the point of viability when setting abortion rules.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Nay. The limit should be removed entirely.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Jacob E)
    No, the point of viability should not be used as a reference for abortion because medical advancements will keep reducing that limit. Abortion should be up to the stage where the foetus is neither aware of what is happening to it nor can feel pain.
    I agree with this ^^^
    • Community Assistant
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Clearing and Applications Advisor
    I've said it before on this subject and so I'll say it again; I don't believe that anyone without a vagina deserves an opinion on the matter.

    Abstain do to my genitals.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Also, that crest is hideous. Don't use it again. Cheers.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 04MR17)
    I've said it before on this subject and so I'll say it again; I don't believe that anyone without a vagina deserves an opinion on the matter.

    Abstain do to my genitals.
    This would result in like 45 people abstaining :lol:

    Having said that, aye: the point at which a foetus becomes viable with medical assistance outside the womb is the point at which it becomes a human being, which is the point at which abortion becomes murder. Anyway, 21 weeks is a long time to decide whether or not you want an abortion.
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    As a big pro-choicer, I actually support this, I've long called for viability to be the cut off, hence it makes sense to adjust the laws accordingly.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by That Bearded Man)
    As a big pro-choicer, I actually support this, I've long called for viability to be the cut off, hence it makes sense to adjust the laws accordingly.
    Hear, hear. After some consideration I am inclined to also vote in favour of this bill.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    I'm in the abstention area for this bill.
    • Community Assistant
    • Clearing and Applications Advisor
    Offline

    22
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    Clearing and Applications Advisor
    (Original post by cranbrook_aspie)
    This would result in 45 people abstaining.:lol:
    Then this house is currently more patriarchal than a parliament which has lasted for centuries and is governed firmly through traditions. I find that disgraceful.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    Nay, the 24 week term limit is fine as it stands. It is there for a reason and when it is safe to preform the abortion and when the foetus is considered a fully developed baby.
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by 04MR17)
    Then this house is currently more patriarchal than a parliament which has lasted for centuries and is governed firmly through traditions. I find that disgraceful.
    We are a "model" house of commons, get over yourself
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by 04MR17)
    Then this house is currently more patriarchal than a parliament which has lasted for centuries and is governed firmly through traditions. I find that disgraceful.
    Do you ever get bored of white knighting?
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 04MR17)
    I've said it before on this subject and so I'll say it again; I don't believe that anyone without a vagina deserves an opinion on the matter.

    Abstain do to my genitals.
    everyone was once a foetus.

    abstain on basis of my belief in the outlawing of abortion.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 04MR17)
    I've said it before on this subject and so I'll say it again; I don't believe that anyone without a vagina deserves an opinion on the matter.

    Abstain do to my genitals.
    I think you mean due.
 
 
 
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: November 8, 2017
The home of Results and Clearing

1,071

people online now

1,567,000

students helped last year
Poll
How are you feeling about GCSE results day?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.