The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

So, how bad is bad actually?
Describe exactly how bad. Say if you got in the bottom 10-20% you might not get an interview.
Sometimes students think the admissions assessment went very badly but it wasn't as bad as you may think... the interview assessment has passed so I wouldn't worry too much. I would start focusing on the next chapter/ business i.e. preparing for an interview even if an invitation does not come.
Original post by black1blade
Describe exactly how bad. Say if you got in the bottom 10-20% you might not get an interview.


Add that if you’re among the lowest cohort in all of the three parts, there’s a slight chance they’ll reject you before interview. But I think to be f*cked up in (two or) three parts you should be doing really bad, like really really bad.
Reply 5
Results are not out yet, but I think I got around 20-30%
Reply 6
The average entry line is a bit above 50%. I think you might still get an interview but would need good predicted grades and to really shine at interview. The exact percentage score doesn't mean that much because people can have different amounts of luck in guessing the multiple choice questions, so two identical candidates could easily have a difference of 10% in their score based on lucky or unlucky guesswork.
Reply 7
Original post by CormaniF
Good morning,
I did the Cambridge pre interview Natural Science assessment (NSAA) and it went bad. Is still there a chance I'll be invited for the interview?


Original post by CormaniF
Results are not out yet, but I think I got around 20-30%


Original post by David888
The average entry line is a bit above 50%.

No.

There's no pass mark (and you won't get results, if at all, unless you request post-Decision feedback.)

It's just one part of the consideration of your application. People last year with very low scores had offers nevermind interviews.

If the rest of your application is strong then you should be fine. You'll know for sure in a few weeks...

Good luck :smile:
(edited 6 years ago)
Reply 8
Original post by Doonesbury
No.
There's no pass mark


An average entry mark is not the same thing as a mandatory entry requirement, but it is a rough gauge of the competition. Glad to hear that it's not the be all and end all, though, as my son also found this tough.
Reply 9
Original post by David888
An average entry mark is not the same thing as a mandatory entry requirement, but it is a rough gauge of the competition. Glad to hear that it's not the be all and end all, though, as my son also found this tough.


Well also consider that these assessments are specifically written to "test" the top 2% of the A-level population. It's likely that nearly everyone finds them pretty tough and it will be the first time that a previously "Straight A*" student will be properly "pushed" by a test. :smile:

Also focussing on an "average entry mark" can be rather misleading - the spread is honestly *very* wide.

Good luck to your son (and you :wink:, as a parent I know what it's like... ) :smile:
Thank you so much for providing an 'inside' perspective. I only posted my 'I think ....' because I was struggling to find such guidance before you posted. My son's teacher had given him the 50%+ figure based on last year, but from your comments it clearly isn't that helpful, even if accurate. Your comments will certainly reassure my son, as he was asking broadly the same question as Cormani yesterday evening.

Good luck to everyone who's having a go - while we may or may not get in to Cambridge, there are enough science problems out there in the big wide world to keep us all busy!

:goodluck:
Reply 11
Original post by David888
Thank you so much for providing an 'inside' perspective. I only posted my 'I think ....' because I was struggling to find such guidance before you posted. My son's teacher had given him the 50%+ figure based on last year, but from your comments it clearly isn't that helpful, even if accurate. Your comments will certainly reassure my son, as he was asking broadly the same question as Cormani yesterday evening.

Good luck to everyone who's having a go - while we may or may not get in to Cambridge, there are enough science problems out there in the big wide world to keep us all busy!

:goodluck:


No problem at all. And I have a chart somewhere showing the spread of marks for applicants Vs offer holders for the ENGAA (Engineering). I'll dig it out asap. All the AAs will show a similar profile.

PS. My son is already at Cambridge (Engineering) and started before these assessments came in. But he did do STEP so I know what "hard" feels like for a DC and a parent... :smile:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 12
Thank you everyone for your responses!!
Reply 13
Original post by David888
Thank you so much for providing an 'inside' perspective. I only posted my 'I think ....' because I was struggling to find such guidance before you posted. My son's teacher had given him the 50%+ figure based on last year, but from your comments it clearly isn't that helpful, even if accurate. Your comments will certainly reassure my son, as he was asking broadly the same question as Cormani yesterday evening.

Good luck to everyone who's having a go - while we may or may not get in to Cambridge, there are enough science problems out there in the big wide world to keep us all busy!

:goodluck:


Here's that ENGAA chart:
ENGAA - S1 - Apps v Offers.jpg

The spread of marks for Offer holders is 1.6 to 9.0
And the coefficient of correlation for Scores and Offers is 0.39 (that's officially "weak").
Thanks Doonesbury, that gives a much more useful picture than an average entry mark. I wish your son strength, happiness and a rewarding career :smile:
Reply 15
Original post by David888
Thanks Doonesbury, that gives a much more useful picture than an average entry mark. I wish your son strength, happiness and a rewarding career :smile:


Good good.

And you're very kind. So far he's on target :smile:

Hopefully your DS will join him next year.

Posted from TSR Mobile
(edited 6 years ago)
Original post by Doonesbury
Here's that ENGAA chart:
ENGAA - S1 - Apps v Offers.jpg

The spread of marks for Offer holders is 1.6 to 9.0
And the coefficient of correlation for Scores and Offers is 0.39 (that's officially "weak":wink:.


Do you also have a chart for Natsci applicants and their NSAA scores?
Reply 17
Original post by Mingsan9
Do you also have a chart for Natsci applicants and their NSAA scores?


Nope. But I guarantee it will be similar.
Original post by Doonesbury
Nope. But I guarantee it will be similar.


Doonesbury, I did well on the section 1 on the ENGAA and also did well on the paper 2 which required working but unfortunately for the paper 2 I forgot to shade in my answers in the beginning of the paper. Does the college review that paper since it required working? If I get a 0 does that mean I dont get an interview?
Reply 19
Original post by bazinga19
Doonesbury, I did well on the section 1 on the ENGAA and also did well on the paper 2 which required working but unfortunately for the paper 2 I forgot to shade in my answers in the beginning of the paper. Does the college review that paper since it required working? If I get a 0 does that mean I dont get an interview?


I doubt it will make any difference whatsoever.

Latest

Trending

Trending