Turn on thread page Beta

6 most common political ‘tribes’ in the UK watch

    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Davij038)
    No i don’t at all. I just think on average more people are good than bad. I think that ‘moral rule enforcers’ should be as limited as possible
    Lest they get too powerful and greedy. All power corrupts.



    A perfect society is never going to happen. But one that protects liberty and virtue is a far better and more human way to live than


    https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.tel...s-last-ye/amp/
    Exactly, and all I am saying is that socialism is far better at that than capitalism, which is essentially allowing those with capital to reduce everyone else's surplus all in the name of "free market". Now economically of course it has shown to work best of what we have yet seen, but that doesn't mean one has to blindly follow it.
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Evil English Defence League covered with ....
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yudothis)
    Exactly, and all I am saying is that socialism is far better at that than capitalism, which is essentially allowing those with capital to reduce everyone else's surplus all in the name of "free market". Now economically of course it has shown to work best of what we have yet seen, but that doesn't mean one has to blindly follow it.
    I’m not sure I follow you, but are you arguing that capitalists steal other people’s wealth? If it’s in a free society that is simply wrong - capitalism CREATES wealth and doesn’t steal it. It’s not a zero sum game.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Davij038)
    I’m not sure I follow you, but are you arguing that capitalists steal other people’s wealth? If it’s in a free society that is simply wrong - capitalism CREATES wealth and doesn’t steal it. It’s not a zero sum game.
    No, I did not say it's stealing, I am saying that wealth creation is overwhelmingly for the ones with capital. Sure there are some trickle down effects, e.g. the brand new TV's now in 10 years will be even cheap for the lower classes so overall there is progress.

    It's the same idea as price discrimination, where seller extracts as much consumer surplus as possible.
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    There is no common political 'tribes' or 'tribes' at all, dogmatism juxtaposes modern politics. Electoral psychology proves voting is based on the public's socialisation and their reaction to events at any given time. Voting is indicative of crises, or the lack of. To claim the UK maintains groups subscribing to narrow political ideologies, is to paint broad brush strokes across voters who do not comprehend complex political agenda and are single issue, or reactionary voters. As much as I am fascinated by political theory, those politically aware often overstate its place against an ever-changing reality.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by yudothis)
    I am saying that wealth creation is overwhelmingly for the ones with capital..
    I wouldn’t say it’s overwhelming but that point I can agree to broadly.

    But the general point is what is the most moral way to change this trend? Now I think we can agree that to have an obscene amount of wealth is wrong. But so is forcing people to do something they don’t want to so long as they have not harmed a real person in some way.

    To me it’s virtually never right unless a national emergency for the government to take more than half your earnings whether your bill gates or a janitor.

    (not paying tax is too impersonal to count- the impersonal nature of big government is where a lot if the problems lie I think)
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Davij038)
    I wouldn’t say it’s overwhelming but that point I can agree to broadly.

    But the general point is what is the most moral way to change this trend? Now I think we can agree that to have an obscene amount of wealth is wrong. But so is forcing people to do something they don’t want to so long as they have not harmed a real person in some way.

    To me it’s virtually never right unless a national emergency for the government to take more than half your earnings whether your bill gates or a janitor.

    (not paying tax is too impersonal to count- the impersonal nature of big government is where a lot if the problems lie I think)
    Well it is. Because you can't look at what we have and conclude it isn't, as what we have, is far from pure capitalism. We have a lot regulations and state intervention actually.

    And well yes, I never said one should adopt pure socialism either. And I would even say that already 40% is quite high taxes. What one needs is a far more efficient government. But that's another story.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    [QUOTE=yudothis;74483268We have a lot regulations and state intervention actually.[/quote]

    Well yeah and lots of it doesn’t seem to be working morally.


    And well yes, I never said one should adopt pure socialism either. And I would even say that already 40% is quite high taxes. What one needs is a far more efficient government. But that's another story.
    So you’re not advocating for socialism you’re advocating for a mixed economy.

    The government does too much it’s insane and they can’t msnage it clearly. The government should do a lot less but a lot better. And it can do this and be very efficient the problem is that socialists then think the state is best at everything just as libertarians conclude that just because the market is better st a lot if things it’s the answer.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    On what plant is Celtic nationalism left wing? Many are opposed to abortion and total social conservatives.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ganjaweed Rebel)
    On what plant is Celtic nationalism left wing? Many are opposed to abortion and total social conservatives.
    There might be some but judging by the policies and elected politicians of plaid, Sinn Fein and the SNP there aren’t that many of them.
    Offline

    15
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Davij038)
    Well yeah and lots of it doesn’t seem to be working morally.




    So you’re not advocating for socialism you’re advocating for a mixed economy.

    The government does too much it’s insane and they can’t msnage it clearly. The government should do a lot less but a lot better. And it can do this and be very efficient the problem is that socialists then think the state is best at everything just as libertarians conclude that just because the market is better st a lot if things it’s the answer.
    You seem to conflate the government with the public sector. They are not one and the same. Lots of areas are deferred and the government isn't required to do all that much with them. Such as the BBC, or the Judiciary for a clearer example.

    I don't think the government is best at everything. I do think that the public sector in many areas can produce a far better and more accessible service than the private sector.
    Online

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Davij038)
    I’m not sure I follow you, but are you arguing that capitalists steal other people’s wealth? If it’s in a free society that is simply wrong - capitalism CREATES wealth and doesn’t steal it. It’s not a zero sum game.
    What do you mean by wealth?

    How does wage labour and the profit motive in capitalist production not represent the theft, or at the very least the appropriation of, of the value of the workers labour?


    It is always worth taking into account that significant amounts and probably the vast majority of State actions disproportionatly benefit the owners of land and capital.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: November 10, 2017

1,748

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process
Useful resources

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.