You are Here: Home >< Maths

# C3 Help watch

1. If I were to integrate x+2/x-1 let u = x-1
du/dx=1 = dx/du

(x+2)/u du and rearranging u for x gives u+1=x

So substituting x in we get (u+3)/u

which simplifies to 1+3/u integrating this gives me u+3lnu which is (x-1)+3ln(x-1). where did i go wrong? because the answer at the back says x+3ln(x-1)

All help is greatly appreciated thanks.
2. This is basically the same as the last thread. Remember your constants of integration.

You have and , differing by only a constant. We have . This constant will differentiate to zero so both of these functions will have the same derivative, hence are both valid antiderivatives. No need to have multiple threads on the same thing
3. (Original post by _gcx)
This is basically the same as the last thread. Remember your constants of integration.

You have and , differing by only a constant. We have . This constant will differentiate to zero so both of these functions will have the same derivative, hence are both valid antiderivatives. No need to have multiple threads on the same thing
Ohhh yes this is exactly the same case! I completely forgot - thanks again
4. I believe the method the book used was polynomial division on the fraction - which makes sense if this were c3, and I would do it anyway if possible for c4.

So (x+2)/(x-1) = ((x-1)+3)/(x-1) = 1 + 3/(x-1)
Which clearly integrates to the book answer.
Of course as gcx said they are both valid answers, this is just a much simpler method.
5. (Original post by carpetguy)
I believe the method the book used was polynomial division on the fraction - which makes sense if this were c3, and I would do it anyway if possible for c4.

So (x+2)/(x-1) = ((x-1)+3)/(x-1) = 1 + 3/(x-1)
Which clearly integrates to the book answer.
Of course as gcx said they are both valid answers, this is just a much simpler method.
I haven't been taught this, so is the exact method to always just get ((x-1)+3) to match the denominator? But I see, thank you And also what type of questions would I be able to use this method for, does i work for all? And this integrates to the answer I got - not the book answer.
6. (Original post by MrToodles4)
I haven't been taught this, so is the exact method to always just get ((x-1)+3) to match the denominator? But I see, thank you And also what type of questions would I be able to use this method for, does i work for all? And this integrates to the answer I got - not the book answer.
Well what I did was a specialised form of polynomial division.

x+2 ÷ x-1 = 1 remainder 3.

So x+2 = 1×(x-1) + 3

Then I split up the fraction.

It should work for pretty much everything, except when the power on the top is higher in which case this precedes partial fractions.
Someone can probably give you a better idea of when to use it than me since I'll just use it if I can - I don't follow any "set rules".

But aside from integration this is handy in curve sketching and differentiation too. It really is just polynomial division.

Btw, it should integrate to the book answer.

### Related university courses

TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

This forum is supported by:
Updated: November 5, 2017
Today on TSR

### He lied about his age

Thought he was 19... really he's 14

### University open days

Wed, 25 Jul '18
2. University of Buckingham
Wed, 25 Jul '18
3. Bournemouth University
Wed, 1 Aug '18
Poll
Useful resources

### Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

### How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

### Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams