Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    how do you work this out....
    Attached Images
       
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    so if you have similar shapes you need to look for a length scale factor. once you have found it you can use it to work out the missing measurement.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    so if you have similar shapes you need to look for a length scale factor. once you have found it you can use it to work out the missing measurement.
    how do you work that out???
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by jesusjessica15)
    how do you work that out???
    so you divide a measurement on the big version of the shape by the corresponding measurement on the small version.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I'm pretty sure the last question was in my maths GCSE paper last year so let me give it a shot:
    We know the width of the rectangle is 4 times the radius, which is 128 mm.
    For the height, there is some overlap between the circles so we can't just say it's 4 x the radius . The way to get around this is by drawing an equilateral triangle between the centres of each circle, with each side having the length of 64mm, twice the radius. If we draw a vertical line down the middle of the triangle, that's its height, which we can calculate using the Pythagoras theorem as being the square root of 64 squared minus 32 squared (c squared minus a squared equals b squared). We can do this because the line down the middle of the equilateral triangle creates two right angled triangles with side lengths 32 and 64 mm. Anyway, doing this calculation gives the result 32root3. So that plus the radius times two gives us the total height of the square (draw this whole thing on paper if you don't get why that is), giving us 64+32root3.
    Now if we multiply that by the width, which we have already calculated to be 128, we get 15286.48, which to 3 significant figures is 15300. Don't forget the mm squared at the end.

    Anyway, hope this helped
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Fblaze1)
    I'm pretty sure the last question was in my maths GCSE paper last year so let me give it a shot:
    We know the width of the rectangle is 4 times the radius, which is 128 mm.
    For the height, there is some overlap between the circles so we can't just say it's 4 x the radius . The way to get around this is by drawing an equilateral triangle between the centres of each circle, with each side having the length of 64mm, twice the radius. If we draw a vertical line down the middle of the triangle, that's its height, which we can calculate using the Pythagoras theorem as being the square root of 64 squared minus 32 squared (c squared minus a squared equals b squared). We can do this because the line down the middle of the equilateral triangle creates two right angled triangles with side lengths 32 and 64 mm. Anyway, doing this calculation gives the result 32root3. So that plus the radius times two gives us the total height of the square (draw this whole thing on paper if you don't get why that is), giving us 64+32root3.
    Now if we multiply that by the width, which we have already calculated to be 128, we get 15286.48, which to 3 significant figures is 15300. Don't forget the mm squared at the end.

    Anyway, hope this helped
    thank you so much
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    still don't get question 1and 2
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    For question 1, you know the shapes are similar, so if the bigger shape is 3 times as wide (which it is, since its width is 3x and the smaller one has a width of x) , it's also gonna be 3 times as long. That means 27 =3(x+3) since 27 is the bigger length and it's gotta be 3 times the smaller length, which is x+3. Anyway 3(x+3)=3x+9. 27=3x+9, take away 9 from both sides, 18 = 3x, divide both sides by 3, x = 6. The width is 3x, so the answer is 3*6, which is 18.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.