This discussion is now closed.
Check out other Related discussions
- can i get in to these unis?
- Official Philosophy/Religion/Theology Applicants Thread 2025
- Can I get into LSE maths with economics with these gcse grades
- Oxford Rejection Reason?
- hsps or ppe
- 93 average out of 100 average
- Should I do 4 A'levels or 3 A'levels and EPQ? Oxford
- How likely am I to be given an offer at Cambridge for Law?
- Oxford or Cambridge for Philosophy
- What do I need to do to have a chance of being accepted into Oxford or Cambridge?
- Possible to do philosphy post grad with english bachelours
- Classics- Oxford or Cambridge?
- Is this application realistic?
- Reapplying to Oxbridge
- Can I get into Oxbridge with Latin, Psychology and Maths?
- Classics at Oxbridge?
- Competitive Application for Law (GCSEs, A levels, LNAT?)
- Cambridge Law
- Should I apply to Cambridge Philosophy? (I got a 5 in GCSE Maths
- Official Cambridge Rejected or Deselected Thread 2025
Cambridge Philosophy Students and Applicants
Hi!
Ok so Ive been pooled from Sidney Sussex for Philosophy and I was just wondering if anyone else is in the same boat? Either for the same or just Philosophy generally?? Also how did everyone find the Philosophy interviews? I haven't had chance to speak to anyone about it since and was just wondering!
Mod Edit: I'm changing the title and location of this thread so it's for current students too - that way it'll be more useful and (hopefully) more friendly for everyone
Ok so Ive been pooled from Sidney Sussex for Philosophy and I was just wondering if anyone else is in the same boat? Either for the same or just Philosophy generally?? Also how did everyone find the Philosophy interviews? I haven't had chance to speak to anyone about it since and was just wondering!
Mod Edit: I'm changing the title and location of this thread so it's for current students too - that way it'll be more useful and (hopefully) more friendly for everyone
Scroll to see replies
Arghghh, I haven't got a decision yet, and this thread is taunting me even more.
I loved my interviews. Both were subject-specific; my general interview even more so than my actual subject interview.
I got the chance to meet all of my competition for Philosophy at Caius, so I think I've got a pretty good image of what's on offer.
What books did you read/discuss? I'm endlessly curious.
I loved my interviews. Both were subject-specific; my general interview even more so than my actual subject interview.
I got the chance to meet all of my competition for Philosophy at Caius, so I think I've got a pretty good image of what's on offer.
What books did you read/discuss? I'm endlessly curious.
Yes, I've been pooled for philosophy too, but my original College was Trinity Hall. My interviews were AWFUL, so I suppose I'm glad to have the second chance of the pool (though I will never be pulled out because my interview notes will be terrible). In response to Nickk0, I read so many books/journals/papers, and didn't get a chance to discuss ANY of them in interview.
I'm sure our folders will have passed each other many times by now in the pool, and I look foward to hopefully seeing you (at one of the obscure less good colleges probably!) in 2008.
I'm sure our folders will have passed each other many times by now in the pool, and I look foward to hopefully seeing you (at one of the obscure less good colleges probably!) in 2008.
Have you e-mailed them??? Mind you, knowing you are in the pool is worse than not knowing anything! I just want to know now.
Well I haven't studies Philosophy academically so the books I talked about were mostly introductions like Simon Blackburn's 'Think' and then 'Sophie's World'. But in my general interview we mostly just talked about Peter Singer's 'Practical Ethics' so whether utilitarianism is good or not etc.
In fact I was the same as you because in my academic interview I hardly talked about what I'd read or my own interests at all...it was all logic games!!
I actually found the interviews really tough so I wasn't expecting a yes...but now I would rather have had a straight yes or no just so I know where I stand!!
Plus there were 7 of us going for it in Sidney where they normally only offer 1 or 2 places...so it was always going to be tough.
How about you??
Well I haven't studies Philosophy academically so the books I talked about were mostly introductions like Simon Blackburn's 'Think' and then 'Sophie's World'. But in my general interview we mostly just talked about Peter Singer's 'Practical Ethics' so whether utilitarianism is good or not etc.
In fact I was the same as you because in my academic interview I hardly talked about what I'd read or my own interests at all...it was all logic games!!
I actually found the interviews really tough so I wasn't expecting a yes...but now I would rather have had a straight yes or no just so I know where I stand!!
Plus there were 7 of us going for it in Sidney where they normally only offer 1 or 2 places...so it was always going to be tough.
How about you??
I had the same odds as you at T Hall - quite tough! It's reassuring to know that other philosophy applicants haven't been picked out the pool yet, since some other people (e.g. Law at Magdalene) have been today or yesterday. I am guessing that the philosophy fellows are conforming to the philosopher stereotype and taking their time over it, probably whilst drinking absinthe!
Haha, a former Phil teacher in my school kept telling my class about how philosophical it was to smoke weed..
I have emailed and phoned them. No answer whatsoever.
Anyway, I got to discuss practically everything I had put on my PS in my general interview; every philosopher passed, and we spend loads of time on my 'speciality'. That was nice, at least I knew what I was talking about. Don't get me wrong; they weren't theoretical questions; still opinion + insight questions.
In my subject interview they deliberately chose a topic they knew I had never ever studied (and I know they did that deliberately, because they actually told me so). It was on aesthetics. Which was hard. Especially because I basically had to define aesthetics with no background information at all.
I'm pretty satisfied with my first interview, not so much with my second. The test was ok, haven't got a clue about how I did.
Btw; 9 applicants for (probably) 2 places at Caius.
I have emailed and phoned them. No answer whatsoever.
Anyway, I got to discuss practically everything I had put on my PS in my general interview; every philosopher passed, and we spend loads of time on my 'speciality'. That was nice, at least I knew what I was talking about. Don't get me wrong; they weren't theoretical questions; still opinion + insight questions.
In my subject interview they deliberately chose a topic they knew I had never ever studied (and I know they did that deliberately, because they actually told me so). It was on aesthetics. Which was hard. Especially because I basically had to define aesthetics with no background information at all.
I'm pretty satisfied with my first interview, not so much with my second. The test was ok, haven't got a clue about how I did.
Btw; 9 applicants for (probably) 2 places at Caius.
NickkO
Haha, a former Phil teacher in my school kept telling my class about how philosophical it was to smoke weed..
I have emailed and phoned them. No answer whatsoever.
Anyway, I got to discuss practically everything I had put on my PS in my general interview; every philosopher passed, and we spend loads of time on my 'speciality'. That was nice, at least I knew what I was talking about. Don't get me wrong; they weren't theoretical questions; still opinion + insight questions.
In my subject interview they deliberately chose a topic they knew I had never ever studied (and I know they did that deliberately, because they actually told me so). It was on aesthetics. Which was hard. Especially because I basically had to define aesthetics with no background information at all.
I'm pretty satisfied with my first interview, not so much with my second. The test was ok, haven't got a clue about how I did.
Btw; 9 applicants for (probably) places at Caius.
I have emailed and phoned them. No answer whatsoever.
Anyway, I got to discuss practically everything I had put on my PS in my general interview; every philosopher passed, and we spend loads of time on my 'speciality'. That was nice, at least I knew what I was talking about. Don't get me wrong; they weren't theoretical questions; still opinion + insight questions.
In my subject interview they deliberately chose a topic they knew I had never ever studied (and I know they did that deliberately, because they actually told me so). It was on aesthetics. Which was hard. Especially because I basically had to define aesthetics with no background information at all.
I'm pretty satisfied with my first interview, not so much with my second. The test was ok, haven't got a clue about how I did.
Btw; 9 applicants for (probably) places at Caius.
OK that sounds like quite a good interview. Best of luck for when you find out. If you are pooled, I look forward to seeing you there(!), but it sounds like you deserve an offer based on that. My interview wasn't very hard at all, and I STILL managed to mess it up and sound like a complete %%%%%%%%%%%%. I suppose I should be glad with the pool really...
Aaaaaaah Dr Oliver is supposed to be amazing too...very into logic though, am I right?
Well yeah I thought Ahmed was just Girton and Robinson but it turns out I had him at Sidney too! He does have an amazing reputation and I cannot say anything bad about him from what I saw...but he did give me some INCREDIBLY hard logiccy questions so I was just wondering if other ppl had similar stuff. I also had Angela Breitenbach in my subject interview (with Ahmed) and then the college chaplain - Revd. Waddell, for my college interview.
Well yeah I thought Ahmed was just Girton and Robinson but it turns out I had him at Sidney too! He does have an amazing reputation and I cannot say anything bad about him from what I saw...but he did give me some INCREDIBLY hard logiccy questions so I was just wondering if other ppl had similar stuff. I also had Angela Breitenbach in my subject interview (with Ahmed) and then the college chaplain - Revd. Waddell, for my college interview.
Yes Dr. Oliver was greaat... No logic-questions though. Probably because I'm more into continental/political/social (etc) philosophy if anything (though I do like logic, otherwhise Cambridge would be a wrong choice), and they did pick up on that. When they asked me "do you have any questions?", I asked them a theoretical question on Nietzsche. They didn't have a clue, but then again - Nietzsche is quite the opposite of Oliver's interests, I suppose.
No i didnt! I had 'if Jones makes a promise to Smith, is he obliged to keep that promise?'...in a simplified version. I did have determinism/fatalismy type questions in the form of ethical 'what would you do?' situations...like should you save the 5 people or the single person or should you let nature take its course etc...is that the kind of thing you had??
Related discussions
- can i get in to these unis?
- Official Philosophy/Religion/Theology Applicants Thread 2025
- Can I get into LSE maths with economics with these gcse grades
- Oxford Rejection Reason?
- hsps or ppe
- 93 average out of 100 average
- Should I do 4 A'levels or 3 A'levels and EPQ? Oxford
- How likely am I to be given an offer at Cambridge for Law?
- Oxford or Cambridge for Philosophy
- What do I need to do to have a chance of being accepted into Oxford or Cambridge?
- Possible to do philosphy post grad with english bachelours
- Classics- Oxford or Cambridge?
- Is this application realistic?
- Reapplying to Oxbridge
- Can I get into Oxbridge with Latin, Psychology and Maths?
- Classics at Oxbridge?
- Competitive Application for Law (GCSEs, A levels, LNAT?)
- Cambridge Law
- Should I apply to Cambridge Philosophy? (I got a 5 in GCSE Maths
- Official Cambridge Rejected or Deselected Thread 2025
Latest
Trending
Last reply 4 days ago
University of Cambridge offer-holders' thread for 2025 entryCambridge Undergraduate
147
205
Last reply 2 weeks ago
Official Cambridge Rejected or Deselected Thread 2025
