Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    Could you please explain the approximations of the weak acids

    My text book says:

    1) HA dissociates to produce equilibrium concentrations of H+ and A- that are equal. There will also be a very small concentration of H+ from the dissociated of water but this will be extremely small and can be neglected compared with the H+ concentration from the acid

    [H+]=[A-]

    What does this paragraph mean and how does the equation above relate



    2) the equilibrium conecentreration of Ha is smaller than the undicsocaited concentration

    [HA]eqm = [HA]start - [H+]eqm

    As the dissociation of weak acids is small, you can assume that [HA] START >> [H+] and you can neglect any decrease in the concentration of HA from disociation

    [HA]eqm = [HA]start

    What???
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Peters)
    Could you please explain the approximations of the weak acids
    Before I begin, have you been taught how to calculate the pH of strong bases?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pigster)
    Before I begin, have you been taught how to calculate the pH of strong bases?
    yes

    pH = -log(H+)
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Peters)
    yes

    pH = -log(H+)
    That's for strong acids, not bases. Have you learnt about Kw?

    (also I hope you write square brackets, not round ones. For the record the square brackets on a standard keyboard are the right of the p key)
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pigster)
    That's for strong acids, not bases. Have you learnt about Kw?

    (also I hope you write square brackets, not round ones. For the record the square brackets on a standard keyboard are the right of the p key)
    aaa, sorry, I remember strong bases: use Kw equation and then use pH=-log(H+)


    Kw = [H+] [OH-]
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Peters)
    1) HA dissociates to produce equilibrium concentrations of H+ and A- that are equal. There will also be a very small concentration of H+ from the dissociated of water but this will be extremely small and can be neglected compared with the H+ concentration from the acid
    When you dissolve HA in water, there are two sources of H+, from the dissociation of HA AND from the dissociation of H2O.

    The 1st assumption is that [H+](from HA) >> [H+](from H2O), i.e. you can ignore the H+ from the H2O.

    (Original post by Frank Peters)
    2) the equilibrium conecentreration of Ha is smaller than the undicsocaited concentration

    [HA]eqm = [HA]start - [H+]eqm

    As the dissociation of weak acids is small, you can assume that [HA] START >> [H+] and you can neglect any decrease in the concentration of HA from disociation

    [HA]eqm = [HA]start

    What???
    The 2nd assumption is basically that the dissociation of HA is sooo small that you can assume (to 3sf) that NONE of the weak acid dissociates, i.e. whatever the concentration of the weak acid is before any of it dissolves is (again to 3sf) the same as the concentration as it is after some it dissociates.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pigster)
    When you dissolve HA in water, there are two sources of H+, from the dissociation of HA AND from the dissociation of H2O.

    The 1st assumption is that [H+](from HA) >> [H+](from H2O), i.e. you can ignore the H+ from the H2O.



    The 2nd assumption is basically that the dissociation of HA is sooo small that you can assume (to 3sf) that NONE of the weak acid dissociates, i.e. whatever the concentration of the weak acid is before any of it dissolves is (again to 3sf) the same as the concentration as it is after some it dissociates.
    I still dont get the first assumption. like how would H20 be involved. Could you possibly give me a full weak acid equation with h20
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Peters)
    I still dont get the first assumption. like how would H20 be involved. Could you possibly give me a full weak acid equation with h20
    also, why would it mean that this assumption means
    [H+]eqm = [A-]eqm
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Peters)
    I still dont get the first assumption. like how would H20 be involved. Could you possibly give me a full weak acid equation with h20
    Essentially, OCR A use moderately weak acids, i.e. those that dissociate a bit, but not too much.

    Water is effectively a super weak acid. Let us say that 1 in 10 000 000 molecules of water turns into H+ and OH-.

    If you add the super weak acid, HA, which also has 1 molecule in 10 000 000 dissociate... if you measure the pH of this HA solution, then where are the H+ ions coming from? (the ones you're detecting when you're measuring pH). From both the HA AND from the water.

    The first assumption is that ALL of the H+ come from the HA, rather from the water. i.e. the weak acid isn't VERY weak.

    The second assumption is that the acid isn't especially strong.

    Ka = [H+][A-] / [HA]

    If the acid were a relatively strong acid, then when it dissolves in water the [HA] would decrease (as it is dissociating to H+ and A-). This would mean you'd have to use quadratics to calculate pH (like we used to have to). But if HA is a relatively weak acid, then [HA] doesn't change by much when it dissolves.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Pigster)
    Essentially, OCR A use moderately weak acids, i.e. those that dissociate a bit, but not too much.

    Water is effectively a super weak acid. Let us say that 1 in 10 000 000 molecules of water turns into H+ and OH-.

    If you add the super weak acid, HA, which also has 1 molecule in 10 000 000 dissociate... if you measure the pH of this HA solution, then where are the H+ ions coming from? (the ones you're detecting when you're measuring pH). From both the HA AND from the water.

    The first assumption is that ALL of the H+ come from the HA, rather from the water. i.e. the weak acid isn't VERY weak.

    The second assumption is that the acid isn't especially strong.

    Ka = [H+][A-] / [HA]

    If the acid were a relatively strong acid, then when it dissolves in water the [HA] would decrease (as it is dissociating to H+ and A-). This would mean you'd have to use quadratics to calculate pH (like we used to have to). But if HA is a relatively weak acid, then [HA] doesn't change by much when it dissolves.

    ok, so why would the book then tell me that [H+]eqm =[A-]eqm
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Frank Peters)
    ok, so why would the book then tell me that [H+]eqm =[A-]eqm
    That's the 1st assumption.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Will you be richer or poorer than your parents?
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.