# How Attractive Are You? (By Science)Watch

#1
How attractive are you based on scientific data? The closer you are to 1.62 (the golden ratio) the more attractive you are. My face got a 1.561 average. That's 1.562/1.62 x 10. That makes my face a 9.64/10 assessed objectively by the golden ratio. What's your score?

Spoiler:
Show

Take measurements in cm. Do the divisions at the end as required, then take the average of those divisions. Divide your number by 1.62 and times it by 10:

0
1 year ago
#2
No
2
#3
(Original post by CheeseIsVeg)
No
Aren't you curious though?
0
1 year ago
#4
I don’t have a tape measure so I’m going to be humble and from looking in the mirror say 9.87/10
11
#5
(Original post by SGHD26716)
I don’t have a tape measure so I’m going to be humble and from looking in the mirror say 9.87/10
StayHumble🙏
0
1 year ago
#6
That's a lot of effort xD
What if you have a really well proportioned face but the features themselves were Shrek-like? ;p
1
1 year ago
#7
(Original post by shameful_burrito)
Aren't you curious though?
Who cares enough to have the time to -
-

Just no.
0
#8
(Original post by Chichaldo)
That's a lot of effort xD
What if you have a really well proportioned face but the features themselves were Shrek-like? ;p
Highly unlikely according to science. That would be an oxymoron The golden ration is the most accurate non-biased way to measure how universally symmetrical and good looking a person is. The golden ratio applies for anything really, it even applies for life. You can always trust maths.
0
1 year ago
#9
No one has time for that bro, just get TSR to rate instead
0
1 year ago
#10
That's long af bro... I'm not gonna waste time on that just to find out I'm clapped
3
1 year ago
#11
Symmetry doesn't do sh*t if you're ugly on both sides
8
1 year ago
#12
(Original post by eden3)
That's long af bro... I'm not gonna waste time on that just to find out I'm clapped
Lmao.
0
#13
(Original post by AprilFeather)
Symmetry doesn't do sh*t if you're ugly on both sides
That's not how he golden ratio works though😂😂
0
1 year ago
#14
This looks so complicated, no thanks
0
1 year ago
#15
allow that
but i am 10/10
i dont need science to tell me otherwise
1
#16
(Original post by UWS)
No one has time for that bro, just get TSR to rate instead
(Original post by eden3)
That's long af bro... I'm not gonna waste time on that just to find out I'm clapped
Looks like I have too much time on my hands then
0
1 year ago
#17
(Original post by shameful_burrito)
Highly unlikely according to science. That would be an oxymoron The golden ration is the most accurate non-biased way to measure how universally symmetrical and good looking a person is. The golden ratio applies for anything really, it even applies for life. You can always trust maths.
Doesn't take into account the state of your teeth, skin, disfigurements etc. Sounds harsh but just arguing my point that symmetry isn't everything. A perfectly symmetrical snail is still a snail, perhaps that's slightly off beat 😂
0
1 year ago
#18
(Original post by shameful_burrito)
Highly unlikely according to science. That would be an oxymoron The golden ration is the most accurate non-biased way to measure how universally symmetrical and good looking a person is. The golden ratio applies for anything really, it even applies for life. You can always trust maths.
The Vitruvian Man is ugly af though.
0
#19
(Original post by toonervoustotalk)
allow that
but i am 10/10
i dont need science to tell me otherwise
According to science the perfect 10 doesn't exist. I'm sorry

You could still be 9.99 I guess
0
#20
(Original post by SGHD26716)
The Vitruvian Man is ugly af though.
Man's got 4 arms and 4 legs. Who wouldn't be😂😂😂
0
X

new posts
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

Yes (40)
50.63%
No (39)
49.37%