Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    Question: If x_{n} is a convergent real sequence with limit L, where x_{n}\neq 0, \enspace \forall n\in\mathbb{N}. Show that \frac{1}{x_{n}} is convergent with limit \frac{1}{L}

    Would it be valid to write the following?

    For x_{n} to be convergent with limit L we must have that \forall \epsilon > 0  \enspace \exists N\in\mathbb{N}: |x_{n}-L|<\epsilon \enspace \forall n>N.

    Suppose that we define \delta = \epsilon |x_{n}L| then |x_{n}-L|<\delta = \epsilon |x_{n}L| so \frac{|x_{n}-L|}{|x_{n}L|}<\epsilon.

    Thus we have that |\frac{1}{L}-\frac{1}{x_{n}}|=|\frac{1}{x_{n}  }-\frac{1}{L}|<\epsilon.

    As required.


    I feel slightly uneasy about dividing by x_{n}. Is this allowed?

    Any help is appreciated
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    You write "Suppose that we define delta ..." but I'm at a loss to what you think this *does*? Certainly defining it isn't enough to decide that |x_n - L| is less than it.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DFranklin)
    You write "Suppose that we define delta ..." but I'm at a loss to what you think this *does*? Certainly defining it isn't enough to decide that |x_n - L| is less than it.
    I have just realised this is terribly unclear. I don't really know what I meant by it. Here is hopefully a more clear (attempted) explanation.

    For x_{n} to be convergent with limit L we must have that \forall \epsilon > 0 \enspace \exists N\in\mathbb{N}: |x_{n}-L|<\epsilon \enspace \forall n\geq N.

    Suppose that |x_{n}-L| < \epsilon |x_{n}L| \enspace \forall n\geq N then \frac{|x_{n}-L|}{|x_{n}L|}<\epsilon.

    Thus we have that |\frac{1}{L}-\frac{1}{x_{n}}|=|\frac{1}{x_{n}  }-\frac{1}{L}|<\epsilon, \enspace \forall n\geq N.
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    You can't suppose the thing your supposing. (I'm kind of puzzled how you thought you *could* suppose it).
    • Study Helper
    Offline

    13
    Should there not be the requirement that L\not=0.

    x_n\not=0 isn't good enough.
    • Community Assistant
    • Welcome Squad
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Cryptokyo)
    Suppose that |x_{n}-L| < \epsilon |x_{n}L|.
    Under what premises are you certain that this is true?
    Online

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by ghostwalker)
    Should there not be the requirement that L\not=0.

    x_n\not=0 isn't good enough.
    Good point.
 
 
 
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • Poll
    What newspaper do you read/prefer?
    Useful resources

    Make your revision easier

    Maths

    Maths Forum posting guidelines

    Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

    Equations

    How to use LaTex

    Writing equations the easy way

    Student revising

    Study habits of A* students

    Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

    Study Planner

    Create your own Study Planner

    Never miss a deadline again

    Polling station sign

    Thinking about a maths degree?

    Chat with other maths applicants

    Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

    Groups associated with this forum:

    View associated groups
  • See more of what you like on The Student Room

    You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

  • The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

    Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

    Quick reply
    Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.