Carly2289
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#1
Hi! I'm trying to write a 25 mark answer where you have to discuss someones liability for involuntary manslaughter. I'm looking at constructive manslaughter (unlawful act manslaughter) where the actus reus and mens rea are for the dangerous and unlawful act. So I was wondering if when answering the question you have to talk through the actus reus and mens rea of the unlawful act (eg battery) and prove that the defendant had the actus reus and mens rea for it, or do you just simply say that the defendant would need to fulfil the actus reus and mens rea of that crime?

Sorry if I made that really confusing!!
0
reply
TSR Jessica
Badges: 19
Rep:
?
#2
Report 3 years ago
#2
Sorry you've not had any responses about this. Are you sure you've posted in the right place? Here's a link to our subject forum which should help get you more responses if you post there.
1
reply
Carly2289
Badges: 12
Rep:
?
#3
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#3
(Original post by TSR Jessica)
Sorry you've not had any responses about this. Are you sure you've posted in the right place? Here's a link to our subject forum which should help get you more responses if you post there.
Thank you!
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Do you have the space and resources you need to succeed in home learning?

Yes I have everything I need (193)
58.13%
I don't have everything I need (139)
41.87%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed