Eyewitness Account from Auschwitz

Listen to this man




People don't know who the real fascists are the one's who destroy bookshops and threaten owners who sell revisionist work.

And these are the so called anti-Nazis.

This still goes on today.

Listen to this man




People don't know who the real fascists are the one's who destroy bookshops and threaten owners who sell revisionist work.

And these are the so called anti-Nazis.

This still goes on today.

why should we listen to this anti-semitic fraud ?

We shouldn't. https://www.hdot.org/judge_toc/

We shouldn't. https://www.hdot.org/judge_toc/

Are you saying that if I opened a can of Zyklon B pellets in a room, it would only take half an hour to kill people?

The Zyklon B pellets were used in all the camps to fumigate clothes and mattresses in order to prevent the spread of typhus.

The piles of bodies are not all Jews and not one of them died of gassing. In any case, nobody is saying that there were homicidal gas chambers at Bergen-Belsen, which is where the piles of bodies were found. There are now only two places where the Holocaust promoters are saying that Jews were gassed - Auschwitz and Majdanek, both situated in Poland and not accessible for official inspection by the authorities until several years after the war. Holocaust promoters have agreed that there were no homicidal gas chambers in Germany proper.

It isn't often now remembered that early in his career, Irving traduced the reputation of a gallant naval officer Captain Jack Broome and record libel damages were awarded against his publisher.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Broome

getting worried ?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-42144186

people can make up their own minds.

They were concentration camps/work camps.

The camps were way to get the Jews out of the way along with any other people who opposed Hitlers regime. Some had to work because as you can imagine most German men were fighting in the war and needed the labor.

Don't forget the Nazi's even had their own Jewish police force now are we really to believe Jews themselves sent them to their own people to extermination camps? come on.


They died of typhus epidemics and maybe the likes of malnutrition and famine towards the end of the war due to lack of supplies.


Here's a sign by the British outside of Bergen Belsen, warning of the typhus that was present during liberation. When you see those images of Holocaust bodies from camps, what makes you believe they were exterminated and didn't die of disease? and yes there is a huge difference. You can't possibly believe they infected camps in purpose that would put their own at risk.





Onto disease outbreaks in camps. These camps had some kind of fumigation facilities which surely tells us they tried to prevent deaths by maintaining cleanliness. Typhus can be spread by the likes of lice in fact I recall something about this in refugee camps and how it they had to get it under control because of the risk. When you cram loads of people together from all over Europe or the Middle East like that it can cause these problems.

What Jews faced in camps was no different to those in gulags. Typhus was also present in those too.

There's plenty of images out there of these fumigation facilities being used by Jewish inmates unless we're to believe it was all done by Nazi's a computer to make camps look somewhat humane...

getting worried ?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-42144186

people can make up their own minds.

It really isn't worth responding to these people. One more piece of evidence isn't going to change the mind of a Holocaust denier.

Here is chilling evidence of what actually happened:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-42144186


please think about this when you see people trying to deny the Holocaust.

An eye witness account is NOT a credible source of evidence. I could claim to have seen Bigfoot 20 years ago in Hyde Park. Would that be solid evidence of bigfoots existence?

if you had seen Bigfoot then yes it would be wonderful evidence. but you didn't.

What exactly is the obsession with 'muh holocaust'? It's just one of hundred genocides that has happened in human history. Why is it that this particular historical event attracts so much attention and sympathy worldwide?
Churchill kills 4 million Indians = Meh.
Hitler supposedly kills 6 million Jews = OY VEY NEVER FORGET ZE CRIMES, WE MUST MENTION ZIS EVERY DAI

It really isn't worth responding to these people. One more piece of evidence isn't going to change the mind of a Holocaust denier.

What makes my eyewitness account any less credible than the Auschwitz one?

Not entirely true.

Almost all holocaust deniers claim there were no gas chambers, and people just died from disease and over work.

The people talking about the numbers are just pseudo historians trying to deny holocaust by 'legitimate' means, via 'historical evidence'.

so are you telling us you saw Bigfoot in London ?

Do you not understand basic analogies?

I've asked a simple question; what makes my eye witness account any less credible than the one of Auschwitz?