The Student Room Group

UCL or LSE for Philosophy & Economics?

Scroll to see replies

LSE 100%

internationally Oxrbidge has a well known reputation and so has LSE due to its excellence in economics - UCL on the other hand does not

despite what world rankings say (which i'm sure some devote UCL students will blag on here to tell you otherwise), there is no denying that LSE > UCL in terms of rep 100% (even within the UK)
Reply 21
You really do miss the point of this entire thread.
I know LSE is better ranked, with a better reputation. You don't need to keep repeating this. I was aware of this when I was originally applying for universities, initially with my heart set on LSE or Oxford, and I still know this now.
:rolleyes:

numbnuts i was answering your question

Sweep

Which leads me to a question. I know it isn't clearcut or anything, but if I ended up looking at postgrad studies, would Harvard/LSE/Oxford tend to look more favorably upon a first class degree from UCL or a 2:1 from LSE?
Reply 23
I knew you were answering the question, it just wasn't a very helpful answer.

Your answer implies that any degree (even third class honours or a mere pass) from LSE would be better than a first at UCL. Perhaps you should spend more time trying to be helpful and less time trying to preach how much better LSE is, then I would feel less like I'm being attacked and more like I'm being helped.
Reply 24
LSE is specialist university and UCL Multi-faculty. You cant really compare. To say LSE is better than UCL is hog wash. Agreed, in selected courses LSE maybe better i.e Economics or Law.
Sweep
I knew you were answering the question, it just wasn't a very helpful answer.

Your answer implies that any degree (even third class honours or a mere pass) from LSE would be better than a first at UCL. Perhaps you should spend more time trying to be helpful and less time trying to preach how much better LSE is, then I would feel less like I'm being attacked and more like I'm being helped.


(1). stop trying to place some victim - 'attacked' :rolleyes: - if you manage to get hurt or feel attacked from an internet forum god help you

(2). care to quote me on where i said even a third class or a pass from LSE >> UCL?

is it my fault that you get these completely idiotic judgments from my apparent implications (which are non-existent)

didn't think i was dealing with someone that dumb that i would have to spell things out to the last letter so to speak

if this came over has too harsh i don't care, i've had enough of people who get rejected by Oxbridge and/or LSE and then accepted at UCL saying that UCL>> than the LSE etc, or that it is one par :rolleyes:

to those who genuinely wanted to go to UCL (i know they exist in many subjects), it is truly an excellent university and good luck with your future studies
Reply 26
i've had enough of people who get rejected by Oxbridge and/or LSE and then accepted at UCL saying that UCL>> than the LSE etc, or that it is one par


I don't think anyone actually says that. Of course that depends what you mean by >

those who genuinely wanted to go to UCL (i know they exist in many subjects)


including economics by the way. Its obviously not common, but for the record, there are a few UCL economists who declined their LSE straight economics offers. My brother (who's account this is and who posted the first post by "plagaan" in this thread - just the last 2 and this one are by me) turned down LSE BMS for UCL.

And, ultimately, if I'm doing subjects which interest me, I'm more likely to come out with successful degree results anyway.
Which leads me to a question. I know it isn't clearcut or anything, but if I ended up looking at postgrad studies, would Harvard/LSE/Oxford tend to look more favorably upon a first class degree from UCL or a 2:1 from LSE?


Sorry, really don't know. But yeah, not clear cut, certainly not as much as the inter-company says. This being TSR though, someone will know. Probably just a case asking on the right forum.
Reply 27
Inter-Company
(1). stop trying to place some victim - 'attacked' :rolleyes: - if you manage to get hurt or feel attacked from an internet forum god help you

Oh, don't you worry about me. I was just answering a simple question and I didn't particularly appreciate the tone of your answer.

Inter-Company
(2). care to quote me on where i said even a third class or a pass from LSE >> UCL?

is it my fault that you get these completely idiotic judgments from my apparent implications (which are non-existent)

Your statements were black & white. You say LSE has a well known reputation and UCL does not, and that LSE is better than UCL in terms of reputation "100%". Yes, LSE has a better reputation, but it isn't that clear cut. If I was someone who didn't know better, then your statements could easily be taken to mean that any degree at UCL is worth less than any half decent degree at LSE.

Inter-Company
didn't think i was dealing with someone that dumb that i would have to spell things out to the last letter so to speak

if this came over has too harsh i don't care, i've had enough of people who get rejected by Oxbridge and/or LSE and then accepted at UCL saying that UCL>> than the LSE etc, or that it is one par :rolleyes:

to those who genuinely wanted to go to UCL (i know they exist in many subjects), it is truly an excellent university and good luck with your future studies

Sure, that's fine, all I'm saying is that you don't need to come over so condescending about LSE's reputation. If you'd read this thread at all you would know that I am fully aware of LSE's superior reputation. Hence, if you felt the need to make such a big point about it, you were either trying to suggest UCL was worthless in comparison or just not being very nice.

Enough with me being stupid anyway. You seem to have some kind of hang-up over it.
Reply 28
Inter-Company
(1). stop trying to place some victim - 'attacked' :rolleyes: - if you manage to get hurt or feel attacked from an internet forum god help you

(2). care to quote me on where i said even a third class or a pass from LSE >> UCL?

is it my fault that you get these completely idiotic judgments from my apparent implications (which are non-existent)

didn't think i was dealing with someone that dumb that i would have to spell things out to the last letter so to speak

if this came over has too harsh i don't care, i've had enough of people who get rejected by Oxbridge and/or LSE and then accepted at UCL saying that UCL>> than the LSE etc, or that it is one par :rolleyes:

to those who genuinely wanted to go to UCL (i know they exist in many subjects), it is truly an excellent university and good luck with your future studies


You are a total donkey and well cut out for a job amongst the other donkeys in the city
Reply 29
Sweep
Oh, don't you worry about me. I was just answering a simple question and I didn't particularly appreciate the tone of your answer.


Your statements were black & white. You say LSE has a well known reputation and UCL does not, and that LSE is better than UCL in terms of reputation "100%". Yes, LSE has a better reputation, but it isn't that clear cut. If I was someone who didn't know better, then your statements could easily be taken to mean that any degree at UCL is worth less than any half decent degree at LSE.


Sure, that's fine, all I'm saying is that you don't need to come over so condescending about LSE's reputation. If you'd read this thread at all you would know that I am fully aware of LSE's superior reputation. Hence, if you felt the need to make such a big point about it, you were either trying to suggest UCL was worthless in comparison or just not being very nice.

Enough with me being stupid anyway. You seem to have some kind of hang-up over it.


There are a lot of people with immense hang ups about university reputation on this site so I would not take this persons comments to heart (you really shouldnt take anything anyone says to heart anyway). You will come to recognise idiotic posts soon enough
Rokit
You are a total donkey and well cut out for a job amongst the other donkeys in the city


way to show how much of a moron you are mate, nice one :smile:
Reply 31
Hiya, UCL gives you exit opportunities to any post grad course and any job. From IB/Consulting to masters at Oxbridge/Ivy League (I think the figure is 40% into postgrad study, and something I am looking at myself, although need to push up my grade a bit too attain that first, which isn't exactly neccessary for post grad study but is helpful for funding).
The people on here telling you that lse has better exit ops don't seem to have gone through the process of these ops.

They are both at the level where all doors are open. Econ + Phil is taught by the phil department which I do not know much about, but from earlier in this thread apparently teaches well.


About LSE Vs UCL. Personally my first choice was Oxford, which I didn't get and LSE was my 4th. Due to the teaching culture. However, the straight econ course at LSE is more competitive. The one thing that I do have a hang up on is the apparent ease which other courses switch onto their straight course (at LSE).

Edit: People saying 2.1 from LSE >1st from UCL I am laughing XD.
Sweep
You're clearly missing the point though. I'm not choosing UCL because it's more fun. I'm choosing it because it's more academically suited to me. If it was down to purely economics, I'd be at LSE, but be vary wary of the culture where everyone wants to end up in finance. Yet when half the degree is based on Philosophy too, I have to make a valued judgment. I am not taking Philosophy only to focus on Scientific Philosophy. Infact, that is perhaps the only branch that I specifically would rather avoid - my ability and interest lies elsewhere.

I'll admit it's a bold decision, to put a preference of doing what suits me over what is generally considered a better university college. But to make the scenario even clearer, what if LSE were offering me a degree in Physics instead? Obviously I'd go to UCL for Philosophy and Economics. That is the basis of my decision, albeit with far tighter margins.

Another factor is the tutoring and lecturing quality - from my research it seems a lot of LSE students really don't get much "value" in their tutoring and lecturing. We hear all this fanfare about their great famous lecturers but they're used pretty much entirely on the postgrads, and the LSE undergraduates end up with crappy foreign lecturers. An overly large proportion of the course ends up being from the textbook - they might as well have stayed at home, really. Such a problem doesn't seem to exist at UCL, certainly not to the same degree.

I've taken an academic risk, no denying it. I'd rather do it for the skills and knowledge that matters to me, than the degree at the end. And if I really need a really prestigious degree at the end of it all? You're right, I can do a postgrad. In the mean time, you only live once.


Sorry to bump an old thread, but this is quite frankly one of the best posts I have seen on this forum.
I am struggling with the personal statement as I am also applying for the same course as you but this year. How did you both combine the philosophy and economics together? Thanks.
Reply 34
Go to lse
Original post by Sweep
I'm starting uni next year. My two top choices are UCL & LSE, and I already have an offer from LSE... but I don't know which of the two is my first choice.

I'm applying to study Economics & Philosophy. I've read quite a lot of reviews and stuff of both unis... the general impression I get is that LSE has more prestige but UCL is a nicer atmosphere with moderately better undergrad teaching and lectures. However, I also got the impression the teaching/lectures quality varied a lot from subject to subject. I've also visited both, felt slightly more at home at UCL but it's hard to judge tbh.

Could anyone studying Economics or Philosophy (or both!) at either UCL or LSE enlighten me with their advice? (Advice from others welcome too!)

Some personal preferences that may be relevant:
I already do Economics at A-Level, but Philosophy will be entirely new to me, so perhaps a broader look at Philosophy would suit me best.
I don't see myself in a city job in finance in the future... the idea of that doesn't excite me. My priority of going to uni isn't to send myself down a career path but to stretch myself academically.


Please give me advice on what I can do to get into LSE for philosophy and economics!!! What did you write on your personal statement, what a levels did you do, what did you get in GCSEs and A levels?
Thank you so much
Original post by Anyazz
Please give me advice on what I can do to get into LSE for philosophy and economics!!! What did you write on your personal statement, what a levels did you do, what did you get in GCSEs and A levels?
Thank you so much

They haven't posted in 8 years and this thread is 14(!) years old.