reece2017
Badges: 1
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 3 years ago
#1
Hello everyone, I am a 1st LLB student seeking your help on how to approach the question below;
"There is no law unless it be just". So the validity of law depends upon its justice. But in human affairs a thing is said to be just when it accords a right with the rule of reason: and as we have already sent,the first rule of reason is the natural law. Thus,all humanly enacted laws are in accord with reason to the extent that they derive from natural law. And if a human law is at variance in any particular with natural law,it is no longer legal, but rather a corruption of law."-St. Augustin.

Using the foregoing excerpt as your point of departure, explain the major differences between natural law thinkers and legal positivism.
0
reply
Notoriety
Badges: 22
Rep:
?
#2
Report 3 years ago
#2
This is rather basic. If you don't follow, it is because you've not read even the most basic materials.

Read them and get back to us. Then we will be able to fine tune your argument rather than invent it as you seem to want us to do here.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

Have you made your mind up on your five uni choices?

Yes, and I've sent off my application! (285)
57.69%
I've made my choices but havent sent my application yet (68)
13.77%
I've got a good idea about the choices I want to make (53)
10.73%
I'm researching but still not sure which universities I want to apply to (42)
8.5%
I haven't started researching yet (26)
5.26%
Something else (let us know in the thread!) (20)
4.05%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed