What if although on the outside I appear to be white, I identically identify as Asian?
It's racist, it'll backfire massively, and honestly do they really think some BAME Labour supporters are now going to attend because it's ยฃ30 who wouldn't have if they had to pay the same as the white man? As the article says it makes it so you have the situation were say an Asian neurosurgeon gets subsidized but the white part-time checkout worker pays full price. They could have least not based it on race and means tested it? Since I assume they're insinuating more BAME members are less wealthy, that would solve the problem for all less fortunate members.