Feminists Are Always Unattractive - Is This Generally True?

Criticize something you don't have the first clue about.

Mila kunis is a feminist. Kim Kardashian is a feminist. Beyoncé is a feminist. I rest my case.

I do have the first clue about it. Have you seen the rabid mainstream feminist narratives?

You talk about liberalism. Not feminism.

I think some of the 'men' contributing to this thread need to rethink what they think women are for.

They are not 'consumer items' made to look pretty just to pander to your sex drive.
Nor should you assume anything about a woman's intellect simply from the way she looks.

It is also not the job of men to define what feminism actually is.

1. Calling yourself a feminist doesn’t make you a feminist - western feminism is no longer about equality it’s a bunch of whiny women who ignore real sexism women face outside of the developed world in favour of moaning about a builder wolf whistling. The most obvious sign that feminism has nothing to with equality is that most of the issues feminists campaign about have nothing to do with sexism.
2. If you’re a celeb and don’t call yourself a feminist and hate Trump and all that stuff you’re basically ostracised. Does it not seem strange that Hollywood doesn’t reflect the population of the US?

Mila kunis is a feminist. Kim Kardashian is a feminist. Beyoncé is a feminist. I rest my case.

I'm afraid they've been lumped together into this catch-all term for regressives called social justice warriors.

That is because liberal feminism is the feminism of SJWs.

But by no means is it the feminism that has fought for women for a century and more and has gotten them to where they are today.

So in other words, egalitarianism is not full of social justice.

I don't think SJWs really want 'social justice'. They just want to push their agenda, and that is not one of 'social justice'.

Misogyny is running wild in this thread.

I think some of the 'men' contributing to this thread need to rethink what they think women are for.

They are not 'consumer items' made to look pretty just to pander to your sex drive.
Nor should you assume anything about a woman's intellect simply from the way she looks.

It is also not the job of men to define what feminism actually is.

If you say so.

I very much doubt men see women exclusively as sex objects. Many see them as friends, partners, sisters, mothers etc. The idea that all men just see women as you say 'consumer items' is so far from reality.

'Nor should you assume anything about a woman's intellect simply from the way she looks.'

No one should be judged by appearance alone but hey we all do it but learn to look past it and learn more about the individual as you get to know them. And men aren't the only ones who judge by appearance, women do too, quite often i'd imagine.

'It is also not the job of men to define what feminism actually is.'

Feminism has already been defined. It's within men's right to debate it's definition with both men and women however they see fit. The subject of feminism isn't exclusive to women only.

Yeah. Basically, most people are actually this these things called egalitarians, right? Guys?