Attached below an integration problem, giving me a hard time. Could someone solve it step by step and in details.https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...25/unknown.png
-
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 1
- 07-02-2018 18:35
-
- Follow
- 2
- 07-02-2018 18:37
Full solutions are not allowed.
Try the substitutionas the numerator is a constant multiple of the derivative of the denominator.
-
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 3
- 07-02-2018 19:32
(Original post by BobbJo)
Full solutions are not allowed.
Try the substitutionas the numerator is a constant multiple of the derivative of the denominator.
Hence,that's why am asking for the solution -
ghostwalker
- Follow
- 86 followers
- 15 badges
- Send a private message to ghostwalker
- Study Helper
Online15Study Helper- Follow
- 4
- 07-02-2018 20:12
(Original post by Darke1231)
As, I mentioned ; I did that already here's what I ended up with.
Hence,that's why am asking for the solution
As BobbJo said, posting full solutions is against forum rules. Post your working if you'd like someone to check it. -
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 5
- 07-02-2018 20:24
Here's how I approached it.
Find
let
Therefore,
,=
,=
We will define the boundaries later, integrating:
Since=
*
Integrating we get;
*
Re-defining the limits as we are dealing with;
Since
Where=a,
=
,Where=2a,
=
So your definite integral will look like this:
Subtracting "" the upper limit from the lower limit will result in
*
However, the answer I got is incorrect , point out the mistake.
Thanks. -
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 6
- 07-02-2018 20:27
(Original post by ghostwalker)
I make it
As BobbJo said, posting full solutions is against forum rules. Post your working if you'd like someone to check it. -
ghostwalker
- Follow
- 86 followers
- 15 badges
- Send a private message to ghostwalker
- Study Helper
Online15Study Helper- Follow
- 7
- 07-02-2018 21:38
(Original post by Darke1231)
Here's how I approached it.
Find
let
Therefore,
,=
,=
We will define the boundaries later, integrating:
Since=
*
Integrating we get;
*
Should be
which doesn't simplify to what you put.
-
K-Man_PhysCheM
- Follow
- 20 followers
- 15 badges
- Send a private message to K-Man_PhysCheM
Offline15ReputationRep:- Follow
- 8
- 07-02-2018 21:39
I haven't worked through the rest of the question, but does that solve your problem? -
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 9
- 08-02-2018 02:08
(Original post by ghostwalker)
You seem to have acquired an extra "u".
Should be
Aside from going wrong earlier, if you had continued along this path, you'd have ended up with:
which doesn't simplify to what you put.
Why multypling them then integrating? and why not integratingthen integrating
as a constant? to be
As this what I did (How I ended up with the extra
)
-
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 10
- 08-02-2018 02:13
(Original post by K-Man_PhysCheM)
The integration there is incorrect.
I haven't worked through the rest of the question, but does that solve your problem?
I see, Thanks. However, in integrating:
Why multypling them then integrating? and why not integratingthen integrating
as a constant? to be
As this what I did (How I ended up with the extra
)
-
K-Man_PhysCheM
- Follow
- 20 followers
- 15 badges
- Send a private message to K-Man_PhysCheM
Offline15ReputationRep:- Follow
- 11
- 08-02-2018 07:47
(Original post by Darke1231)
I see, Thanks. However, in integrating:
Why multypling them then integrating? and why not integratingthen integrating
as a constant? to be
As this what I did (How I ended up with the extra
)
eg
whereand
are constants.
This example is no different. -
ghostwalker
- Follow
- 86 followers
- 15 badges
- Send a private message to ghostwalker
- Study Helper
Online15Study Helper- Follow
- 12
- 08-02-2018 07:53
(Original post by Darke1231)
I see, Thanks. However, in integrating:
Why multypling them then integrating? and why not integratingthen integrating
as a constant? to be
As this what I did (How I ended up with the extra
)
If you're going to try treat it as a function of u, then you're trying to integrate a product of two functions, in which case you need to use integration by parts. It's massive overkill, but you might find it useful as an exercise to do it that way.
There is no justfitication for integating the product of two functions one at a time and multiplying them. If there were you could have, for example:
which is clearly WRONG.
Last edited by ghostwalker; 08-02-2018 at 07:54. -
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 13
- 08-02-2018 08:08
(Original post by ghostwalker)
Well, 1/4a is just a constant, you can pull it out of the integral.
If you're going to try treat it as a function of u, then you're trying to integrate a product of two functions, in which case you need to use integration by parts. It's massive overkill, but you might find it useful as an exercise to do it that way.
There is no justfitication for integating the product of two functions one at a time and multiplying them. If there were you could have, for example:
which is clearly WRONG.
-
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 14
- 08-02-2018 08:10
(Original post by K-Man_PhysCheM)
When you integrate a function multiplied by a constant, you just integrate the function itself and leave the constant multiple unaffected.
eg
whereand
are constants.
This example is no different. -
- Follow
- 15
- 08-02-2018 13:13
(Original post by Darke1231)
Attached below an integration problem, giving me a hard time. Could someone solve it step by step and in details.https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachmen...25/unknown.png
(Original post by Darke1231)
As, I mentioned ; I did that already here's what I ended up with.
Hence,that's why am asking for the solution -
Darke1231
- Follow
- 0 followers
- 5 badges
- Send a private message to Darke1231
- Thread Starter
Offline5ReputationRep:- Follow
- 16
- 08-02-2018 19:44
(Original post by BobbJo)
I'm not sure where you mentioned that. I must be blind. I feel bad that I can't read minds.
- Trig/Integration Problem - help!
- Integration problem
- Integration help (any help is better than none!)
- integration help!
- Integration Problem 2
- Need help with an Integration under the curve question.
- Need help with this tricky integration question
- Integration help ..getting it in the form lnf(x)+c...
- Integration help
- C4 Integration Help
-
University of Leeds
-
University of Sussex
-
Queen Mary University of London
-
University of St Andrews
-
Digital Media & Information Studies/Mathematics
University of Glasgow
-
University of Leeds
-
University of South Wales
-
Mathematics/Physics (Equal) with a year in Europe
University of York
-
Medicinal Chemistry and Mathematics
Keele University
-
Heriot-Watt University
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
- SherlockHolmes
- Notnek
- charco
- Mr M
- Changing Skies
- F1's Finest
- rayquaza17
- RDKGames
- davros
- Gingerbread101
- Kvothe the Arcane
- TeeEff
- The Empire Odyssey
- Protostar
- TheConfusedMedic
- nisha.sri
- claireestelle
- Doonesbury
- furryface12
- Amefish
- harryleavey
- Lemur14
- brainzistheword
- Rexar
- Sonechka
- TheAnxiousSloth
- EstelOfTheEyrie
- CoffeeAndPolitics
- an_atheist
- Labrador99
- EmilySarah00