Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Hi guys, so just stuck on part iv-working out the frictional force bit. Here's my working out for part iv):
    F = ma
    T2 -T1 -F = 5 x 0.5
    27 -22 - F =2.5
    5 -F =2.5
    F=2.5
    But F is meant to 5. Would really appreciate any help on where I went wrong.
    Name:  37.PNG
Views: 15
Size:  79.0 KB
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    Just attached here the full mark scheme: just stuck on part iv-working out the frictional force bit. Here's my working out for part iv):
    F = ma
    T2 -T1 -F = 5 x 0.5
    27 -22 - F =2.5
    5 -F =2.5
    F=2.5
    But F is meant to 5. Would really appreciate any help on where I went wrong.
    Name:  38.PNG
Views: 16
Size:  251.4 KB
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sienna2266)
    Hi guys, so just stuck on part iv-working out the frictional force bit. Here's my working out for part iv):
    F = ma
    T2 -T1 -F = 5 x 0.5
    27 -22 - F =2.5
    5 -F =2.5
    F=2.5
    But F is meant to 5. Would really appreciate any help on where I went wrong.
    It looks as though you've carried over the values of T1 and T2 from earlier parts of the question. But this is wrong as the acceleration of the system is now different. As a result, you have to reapply Fnet = ma to the 2kg and 3kg masses to find the new values of T1 and T2. Then you should be OK.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by old_engineer)
    It looks as though you've carried over the values of T1 and T2 from earlier parts of the question. But this is wrong as the acceleration of the system is now different. As a result, you have to reapply Fnet = ma to the 2kg and 3kg masses to find the new values of T1 and T2. Then you should be OK.
    Thank you so much - so whenever the acceleration changes, the tension changes? If the table was rough to begin with and then the acceleration changes, would that mean that all the forces apart from weight would change - so tension(an internal force) and friction and all the other external forces would change?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by old_engineer)
    It looks as though you've carried over the values of T1 and T2 from earlier parts of the question. But this is wrong as the acceleration of the system is now different. As a result, you have to reapply Fnet = ma to the 2kg and 3kg masses to find the new values of T1 and T2. Then you should be OK.
    Thank you so much - so whenever the acceleration changes, the tension changes? If the table was rough to begin with and then the acceleration changes, would that mean that all the forces apart from weight would change - so tension(an internal force) and friction and all the other external forces would change?
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sienna2266)
    Thank you so much - so whenever the acceleration changes, the tension changes? If the table was rough to begin with and then the acceleration changes, would that mean that all the forces apart from weight would change - so tension(an internal force) and friction and all the other external forces would change?
    Yes that's right. Looking at either of the suspended weights, ma = Fnet and Fnet = mg - T (or T - mg), so if "a" changes then T must also change as it is the only other variable in the equation.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by old_engineer)
    Yes that's right. Looking at either of the suspended weights, ma = Fnet and Fnet = mg - T (or T - mg), so if "a" changes then T must also change as it is the only other variable in the equation.
    Thank you so much-this makes sense! However, why doesn't the tension change here? This is someone else's post but also confused me as well
    https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/sho....php?t=5202828

    As discussed, when the acceleration changes then the tension and all other forces apart from weight changes, so why does it not apply to the question in the other person's thread?
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sienna2266)
    Thank you so much-this makes sense! However, why doesn't the tension change here? This is someone else's post but also confused me as well
    https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/sho....php?t=5202828

    As discussed, when the acceleration changes then the tension and all other forces apart from weight changes, so why does it not apply to the question in the other person's thread?
    The short answer is that there is another force involved, namely resistance. Fnet = T - mg - R, and it is the introduction of R that causes the change in acceleration.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by old_engineer)
    The short answer is that there is another force involved, namely resistance. Fnet = T - mg - R, and it is the introduction of R that causes the change in acceleration.
    But in my question which is about the table and the pulleys, it is the introduction of friction which cause a change in acceleration (cause if the table is not smooth,then friction is what changes the acceleration). Similarly, on the other person's question, it is the introduction of resistance R which changes the acceleration. However, in my question, the tensions are changed but in the other question the tensions are not changed. Which brings me back to square one
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by sienna2266)
    But in my question which is about the table and the pulleys, it is the introduction of friction which cause a change in acceleration (cause if the table is not smooth,then friction is what changes the acceleration). Similarly, on the other person's question, it is the introduction of resistance R which changes the acceleration. However, in my question, the tensions are changed but in the other question the tensions are not changed. Which brings me back to square one
    That's a good question. The answer, in this case, is that the frictional force is not acting on the suspended weights. The components of Fnet for the suspended weights remain as just T and mg. Therefore if a changes, so must T change.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by old_engineer)
    That's a good question. The answer, in this case, is that the frictional force is not acting on the suspended weights. The components of Fnet for the suspended weights remain as just T and mg. Therefore if a changes, so must T change.
    Thanks so so much! Really appreciate your time!
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: February 16, 2018
Poll
Is the Big Bang theory correct?
Useful resources

Make your revision easier

Maths

Maths Forum posting guidelines

Not sure where to post? Read the updated guidelines here

Equations

How to use LaTex

Writing equations the easy way

Student revising

Study habits of A* students

Top tips from students who have already aced their exams

Study Planner

Create your own Study Planner

Never miss a deadline again

Polling station sign

Thinking about a maths degree?

Chat with other maths applicants

Can you help? Study help unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.