in the first example.
the car is traveling in a circle. I guess that the speed at which its traveling is whats acting away from the centre, but because its not slipping, friction is acting in the opposite directing to any of the angles the car is traveling in? if we take one position: the cars speed is acting towards the left < , so friction is acting towards the right, but the reaction force is also acting towards the left (the same as the speed of the car)?
the second example, both the speed and the reaction force are acting towards the centre? so, whats stoping it from traveling in that direction?

Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 1
 16022018 16:59
Last edited by Maths&physics; 16022018 at 17:27. 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 2
 16022018 17:41
it would help me to know how this acting.
its acting in a circle on the surface, like 1, or is it traveling around it like 2?Last edited by Maths&physics; 16022018 at 17:46. 
KMan_PhysCheM
 Follow
 20 followers
 15 badges
 Send a private message to KMan_PhysCheM
Offline15ReputationRep: Follow
 3
 16022018 17:45
(Original post by Maths&physics)
it would help me to know how this acting.
is acting in a circle on the surface, like 1, or is it traveling around it like 2? 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 4
 16022018 17:49
(Original post by KMan_PhysCheM)
It's travelling round a bend on a banked track: imagine cyclists going round a velodrome. So 2 is the better representation.
so, in the second example: the 2 forces are acting inwards, and theres no friction, so whats stopping it from going to the centre? 
KMan_PhysCheM
 Follow
 20 followers
 15 badges
 Send a private message to KMan_PhysCheM
Offline15ReputationRep: Follow
 5
 16022018 17:56
(Original post by Maths&physics)
ah, ok.
so, in the second example: the 2 forces are acting inwards, and theres no friction, so whats stopping it from going to the centre?
In this case, the ball it is travelling at such a speed along a particular circle on the hemispherical bowl such that it stays in its circular path, without falling towards the centre. Therefore you can conclude that the upwards component of the normal contact force must exactly equal the weight force, but in opposite direction. This is the only way that the ball could not fall in towards the centre.
Resolving vertically:
Resolving horizontally:
The rest is some simple geometry. 
Notnek
 Follow
 155 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to Notnek
 Community Assistant
 Study Helper
Offline20ReputationRep:Community AssistantStudy Helper Follow
 6
 16022018 18:31
(Original post by Maths&physics)
in the first example.
the car is traveling in a circle. I guess that the speed at which its traveling is whats acting away from the centre, but because its not slipping, friction is acting in the opposite directing to any of the angles the car is traveling in? if we take one position: the cars speed is acting towards the left < , so friction is acting towards the right, but the reaction force is also acting towards the left (the same as the speed of the car)?
the second example, both the speed and the reaction force are acting towards the centre? so, whats stoping it from traveling in that direction?
Speed or velocity is not a force so you can't compare it with friction to determine what will happen to the car. The tangential speed is constant but it is continually changing direction which means the velocity is changing and a change of velocity means that there is acceleration. This acceleration acts towards the centre of the circle and so there must be force acting towards the centre of the circle which is known as the centripedal force.
The centripedal force required to keep an object moving in a circle is
So this force is proportional to the square of the tangential speed. The faster the speed, the bigger force is required to maintain circular motion. This will make sense if you imagine yourself in the car.
In your first question since you're considering maximum speed, this is going to require a big centripedal force to maintain circular motion so friction will need to act down the slope to maintain this big force. So you have this situation:
The first diagram shows the three forces acting on the particle and the second shows the horizontal/vertical components.
The centripedal force must satisfy .
So the friction needs to be big enough to maintain this big force directed left otherwise the car will slip. There is a maximum friction which means that eventually as you increase the speed there will be a point where the centripedal force cannot be maintained anymore and the car slips.Last edited by Notnek; 16022018 at 18:37. 
old_engineer
 Follow
 9 followers
 11 badges
 Send a private message to old_engineer
Offline11ReputationRep: Follow
 7
 16022018 18:35
(Original post by Maths&physics)
ah, ok.
so, in the second example: the 2 forces are acting inwards, and theres no friction, so whats stopping it from going to the centre?
Now put the bowl back. The bowl is the only thing that is stopping the particle from (a) travelling in a straight line as opposed to a circle and (b) falling vertically under the influence of gravity. To do that, the bowl must be exerting a force on the particle that can be resolved into a vertical component equal to mg and a horizontal component directed towards the centre of rotation equal to mrw^2. 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 8
 19022018 12:45
(Original post by KMan_PhysCheM)
The normal contact force has an upwards component.
In this case, the ball it is travelling at such a speed along a particular circle on the hemispherical bowl such that it stays in its circular path, without falling towards the centre. Therefore you can conclude that the upwards component of the normal contact force must exactly equal the weight force, but in opposite direction. This is the only way that the ball could not fall in towards the centre.
Resolving vertically:
Resolving horizontally:
The rest is some simple geometry.
and r cos (theta) is acting towards the centre, whilst the speed is pushing the particle away, hence why its in equilibrium?Last edited by Maths&physics; 19022018 at 12:49. 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 9
 19022018 12:56
(Original post by Notnek)
Your commentary on the first diagram seems to lack a bit of understanding so I'll post an explanation below, plus I've never explained this topic on here before!
Speed or velocity is not a force so you can't compare it with friction to determine what will happen to the car. The tangential speed is constant but it is continually changing direction which means the velocity is changing and a change of velocity means that there is acceleration. This acceleration acts towards the centre of the circle and so there must be force acting towards the centre of the circle which is known as the centripedal force.
The centripedal force required to keep an object moving in a circle is
So this force is proportional to the square of the tangential speed. The faster the speed, the bigger force is required to maintain circular motion. This will make sense if you imagine yourself in the car.
In your first question since you're considering maximum speed, this is going to require a big centripedal force to maintain circular motion so friction will need to act down the slope to maintain this big force. So you have this situation:
The first diagram shows the three forces acting on the particle and the second shows the horizontal/vertical components.
The centripedal force must satisfy .
So the friction needs to be big enough to maintain this big force directed left otherwise the car will slip. There is a maximum friction which means that eventually as you increase the speed there will be a point where the centripedal force cannot be maintained anymore and the car slips. 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 10
 19022018 12:57
(Original post by old_engineer)
The second example is like a ball bearing rolling round the inside of a hemispherical bowl, such that it's motion forms a horizontal circle. Now consider what would happen if the bowl suddenly disappeared. Answer: the particle would become a projectile. The horizontal component of it's motion would remain constant and it would travel in a straight line when viewed from above or below. At the same time it would fall vertically under the influence of gravity.
Now put the bowl back. The bowl is the only thing that is stopping the particle from (a) travelling in a straight line as opposed to a circle and (b) falling vertically under the influence of gravity. To do that, the bowl must be exerting a force on the particle that can be resolved into a vertical component equal to mg and a horizontal component directed towards the centre of rotation equal to mrw^2. 
Notnek
 Follow
 155 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to Notnek
 Community Assistant
 Study Helper
Offline20ReputationRep:Community AssistantStudy Helper Follow
 11
 19022018 13:06
(Original post by Maths&physics)
thank you notnek, this was a great explanation but im going to have to go over it a couple of times to make sure I completely understand it.
The key concept in my post is that the faster the speed, the bigger the force required to maintain circular motion. Then think about how the forces e.g. friction will affect the force directed towards the centre and how they change for low/high speed. 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 12
 19022018 13:29
(Original post by Notnek)
If you have any questions let me know.
The key concept in my post is that the faster the speed, the bigger the force required to maintain circular motion. Then think about how the forces e.g. friction will affect the force directed towards the centre and how they change for low/high speed.
is acting towards the centre, whilst is is acting in the opposite direction: therefore, theres equilibrium. 
Notnek
 Follow
 155 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to Notnek
 Community Assistant
 Study Helper
Offline20ReputationRep:Community AssistantStudy Helper Follow
 13
 19022018 13:36
(Original post by Maths&physics)
so, as I understand it.
is acting towards the centre, whilst is is acting in the opposite direction: therefore, theres equilibrium.
This resultant force is equal to mv^2/r which is equal to the combined reaction and friction force components. There is no force pointing in the opposite direction in this case. 
Marie12223
 Follow
 0 followers
 2 badges
 Send a private message to Marie12223
Offline2ReputationRep: Follow
 14
 19022018 13:38
guys could i get some help with chemistry
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play 
Notnek
 Follow
 155 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to Notnek
 Community Assistant
 Study Helper
Offline20ReputationRep:Community AssistantStudy Helper Follow
 15
 19022018 13:46
(Original post by Marie12223)
guys could i get some help with chemistry 
Marie12223
 Follow
 0 followers
 2 badges
 Send a private message to Marie12223
Offline2ReputationRep: Follow
 16
 19022018 13:47
sure why not 😐
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 17
 19022018 14:02
(Original post by Notnek)
No there’s no equilibrium directed towards the centre of the circle. The car is actually accelerating towards the centre of the circle. This can seem a bit strange because the car is not moving towards the centre. But it is continually changing direction in a circle which means there must be acceleration.
sorry, equilibrium was the wrong word.
This resultant force is equal to mv^2/r which is equal to the combined reaction and friction force components. There is no force pointing in the opposite direction in this case. 
Notnek
 Follow
 155 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to Notnek
 Community Assistant
 Study Helper
Offline20ReputationRep:Community AssistantStudy Helper Follow
 18
 19022018 14:14
(Original post by Maths&physics)
this is where I dont understand. if friction and the resultant force are acting in one direction, whats acting in the opposite to stop it?
It's like a satellite in orbit around Earth : there is a force pulling it to the centre (Earth's gravity) but no force opposing that. But it doesn't fall towards the Earth because it has a constantly changing velocity. 
Maths&physics
 Follow
 1 follower
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Maths&physics
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 19
 19022018 14:17
(Original post by Notnek)
There isn't anything. The friction/reaction produce a resultant force (and therefore acceleration) directed towards the centre of the circle which is the centripetal force.
It's like a satellite in orbit around Earth : there is a force pulling it to the centre (Earth's gravity) but no force opposing that. But it doesn't fall towards the Earth because it has a constantly changing velocity. 
Notnek
 Follow
 155 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to Notnek
 Community Assistant
 Study Helper
Offline20ReputationRep:Community AssistantStudy Helper Follow
 20
 19022018 14:23
(Original post by Maths&physics)
are you able to draw a small diagram illustrating this please? because im having trouble. thanks
The centripetal force is directed towards the centre of the circle and there are no other forces. This produces an acceleration towards the centre of the circle.
On a banked track it is a combination of weight (and reaction force) and friction that produces this force. Depending on the speed, friction may act in the opposite direction but there will be a resultant force directed towards the centre if the particle is moving in a circle.Last edited by Notnek; 19022018 at 14:25.
 1
 2
Related discussions
Related university courses

Mathematics with Finance
University of Manchester

Mathematics and Computer Science
Queen's University Belfast

Mathematics and Physics
University of Surrey

Mathematics and Statistics
University of Edinburgh

Initial Year for Extended Degree in Science  Mathematics
University of Hertfordshire

Mathematics
University of Oxford

Mathematics (4 years)
Durham University

Mathematics (4 years)
Durham University

Mathematics and Statistics
University of Oxford

Mathematics with Foundation Year
University of Southampton
see more
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
 Notnek
 charco
 Mr M
 Changing Skies
 F1's Finest
 RDKGames
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Quirky Object
 TheAnxiousSloth
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00
 thekidwhogames
 entertainmyfaith
 Eimmanuel
 Toastiekid
 CinnamonSmol
 Qer
 The Empire Odyssey
 RedGiant
 Sinnoh