Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    Hi, I don't get why they didn't include the negative sign in the calculations for the negative charge? I did this and got the distance as -0.08. This is for b (ii) working. I get why they put the charge as positive in b (i) since its just magnitude. Any help would be greatly appreciated thank you!

    Question: http://prntscr.com/ihlgos

    Markscheme: http://prntscr.com/ihlgjq
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    I think the negative sign you're looking for is between the brackets.

    The resultant potential at that point would be the SUM of the potentials due to the two charges and the sum is zero. They've simply moved the negative sign from the charge to between brackets.

    Like saying A + (-B) = A - B
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by phys981)
    I think the negative sign you're looking for is between the brackets.

    The resultant potential at that point would be the SUM of the potentials due to the two charges and the sum is zero. They've simply moved the negative sign from the charge to between brackets.

    Like saying A + (-B) = A - B
    Oh i see! So you dont set them equal but rather find the resultant of them which would = 0. Ah i get it thank you!
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: February 21, 2018

1,776

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.