KatieMullen
Badges: 9
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#1
I'm currently writing an essay on the plausibility of moral relativism and have been looking at agent and appraiser forms of relativism as described by David Lyons
One of the issues with appraiser relativism is that entails a contradiction where two people can say opposite things but if they're part of different cultures with different norms then what they're saying is both true to their cultures. But of course, it is a contradiction to say 'abortion is wrong' and 'abortion is not wrong' are both true

So, I am wondering if anyone can help me, has anyone replied to this contradiction to try and save appraiser relativism or does anyone have any ideas about how to refute that this is a contradiction?
0
reply
gjd800
Badges: 20
Rep:
?
#2
Report 2 years ago
#2
Not sure on the precise application because I've never had truck with relativism, but I guess that some variations of paraconsistent logic can get you out of situations such as this. That's if you really want to head down a logic route, anyway. Graham Priest would be the obvious one to start with because he does a lot of work on how a statement can be true, not true, both true and not true, neither true nor no true.

EDIT - I'm not convinced that two people from two different cultures claiming opposite values about the same thing are necessarily in contradiction. It is only a contradiction if you have a predilection to objective ethics/morality, viz, one must be wrong and one must be right, owing to some fact about the world that can be objectively determined. If you do not accept that maxim (that there are objective ethical truths), then this simply not a problem. So a way to settle the 'contradiction' would be to build a good argument that there are no objective moral truths.

In such a case, I'd imagine an ethical objectivist to be deeply dissatisfied even with something like a dialetheist approach.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

If you're planning on going to uni this year, would any of these financial reasons stop you?

Not being able to work now to save up for uni (92)
13.94%
Reduced household income due to coronavirus means I can't afford to go (54)
8.18%
Lack of part-time jobs to support me while I'm at uni (85)
12.88%
Lack of graduate job prospects when I finish uni (79)
11.97%
Other reasons are stopping me going (84)
12.73%
Nothing is stopping me going (266)
40.3%

Watched Threads

View All
Latest
My Feed