Turn on thread page Beta

Should women be aloud to fight on the front line ! watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    I am writing an essay about people’s views on women’s rights to fight , it would be a great help if you all can comment your views ( as long as they are respectful, but be as honest as you can ) thank you ✨
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rebecca_keill)
    I am writing an essay about people’s views on women’s rights to fight , it would be a great help if you all can comment your views ( as long as they are respectful, but be as honest as you can ) thank you ✨
    As long as they are not too loud, sure.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rebecca_keill)
    I am writing an essay about people’s views on women’s rights to fight , it would be a great help if you all can comment your views ( as long as they are respectful, but be as honest as you can ) thank you ✨
    You might want to check out the Kurds in particular as an example - they are known for their female fighters.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Thank you for your help.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    If they can pass the SAME fitness test as the men then I have no problem.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Thanks
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    you might want to mention the Russian female snipers;

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/...trip=all&w=960

    although they look like dinner ladies they killed hundreds of Huns.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/3366...s-to-her-name/
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Thank you this will be great
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Rebecca_keill)
    I am writing an essay about people’s views on women’s rights to fight , it would be a great help if you all can comment your views ( as long as they are respectful, but be as honest as you can ) thank you ✨
    If they are willing to help why not let them.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    you might want to mention the Russian female snipers;

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/wp-content/...trip=all&w=960

    although they look like dinner ladies they killed hundreds of Huns.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/living/3366...s-to-her-name/
    Dinner ladies are Lethal. Take my old primary schools cafeteria for example.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andrew97)
    Dinner ladies are Lethal. Take my old primary schools cafeteria for example.
    yes; they could have used Semolina as a munition.
    Offline

    11
    ReputationRep:
    They should set physical and mental health tests and anyone who passes those, regardless of gender/race/religion/class, can serve on the front line
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    Very true thank you
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Andrew97)
    If they can pass the SAME fitness test as the men then I have no problem.
    That is kinda arbitrary though. A more equitable arrangement would be for women to be subject to tests that reflect female potentials rather than male potentials. After all, not all male soldiers are of equal fitness/strength/agility, so if we can accept variation across men why not between men and women who we know to have different physiology.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Axiomasher)
    That is kinda arbitrary though. A more equitable arrangement would be for women to be subject to tests that reflect female potentials rather than male potentials. After all, not all male soldiers are of equal fitness/strength/agility, so if we can accept variation across men why not between men and women who we know to have different physiology.
    All men have to pass a set test, so not sure why that matters? Yes, some pass it 'better' than others, but they still pass.
    Those that don't, don't get in. Shouldn't be any different for women.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Drewski)
    All men have to pass a set test, so not sure why that matters? Yes, some pass it 'better' than others, but they still pass.
    Those that don't, don't get in. Shouldn't be any different for women.
    Sure, a set test which presumably was designed with men in mind. We could require women to pass a test designed for men or, more equitably, design a test for women, given that we know women don't have same kind of strength/agility etc.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Axiomasher)
    Sure, a set test which presumably was designed with men in mind. We could require women to pass a test designed for men or, more equitably, design a test for women, given that we know women don't have same kind of strength/agility etc.
    The issue with that being that when you're on the front line there are certain requirements placed on you; got to carry X amount of kit, be able to carry a wounded colleague... Watering down the test to allow, essentially, weaker people in means you will be putting people at risk.

    Having a single set standard for everyone to meet means you don't lose capability - losing capability on the front line means losing lives.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    in the Great War there were specially formed Bantam Battalions which comprised men of short stature. although they fought valiantly they were always at a disadvantage when facing full-sized Huns.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Drewski)
    The issue with that being that when you're on the front line there are certain requirements placed on you; got to carry X amount of kit, be able to carry a wounded colleague... Watering down the test to allow, essentially, weaker people in means you will be putting people at risk.

    Having a single set standard for everyone to meet means you don't lose capability - losing capability on the front line means losing lives.
    I hear what you are saying but this kind of objection only goes so far in my view. Firstly, requirements re kit are like the tests, usually historically based on what males can reasonably be expected to carry. Secondly, there are some big men in the military and not all, if many, of their colleagues will be able to carry them if wounded, so the idea that everyone should be able to carry everyone else isn't very credible.
    Offline

    16
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by the bear)
    in the Great War there were specially formed Bantam Battalions which comprised men of short stature. although they fought valiantly they were always at a disadvantage when facing full-sized Huns.
    Stilts.
 
 
 
Poll
Who is most responsible for your success at university
Useful resources
Uni match

Applying to uni?

Our tool will help you find the perfect course

Articles:

Debate and current affairs guidelinesDebate and current affairs wiki

Quick link:

Educational debate unanswered threads

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.