Turn on thread page Beta

[1] Room 101 - Slurping Drinks watch

  • View Poll Results: Should Slurping be locked in Room 101?
    Yes
    41.67%
    No
    58.33%

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    If you are confused as to what this is, see this post:
    https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/sho...6#post76536106

    Koalifications: For the first Room 101 debate, I propose that we put slurping into Room 101. I hate slurping, and I really mean hate. The sound of someone slurping a drink really gets to me, and I don't know why. One of my family members often drinks tea, but every sip is taken with an unnecessarily loud slurping sound. Whilst this idea might sound over the top and a first-world problem, wouldn't it just be better to get rid of slurping once and for all? Slurping through a straw, however, is not so bad, because it often cannot be helped, but slurping drinks like tea, water or coffee for no real reason is horrible - especially when the person refuses to stop.








    See that video? Doesn't that just grind your gears...?

    Now you can vote. Comment your opinions, backing them up with science, religion, facts, and whatever else, and we will see whether slurping drinks will be locked into Room 101 forever.


    Taglist
    Spoiler:
    Show
    Offline

    21
    It's only annoying when you tune in to it, itherwise if you're having a really enjoyable conversation, it doesn't even register. There's some satisfaction to be had when you slurp sometimes
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by starfab)
    It's only annoying when you tune in to it, otherwise if you're having a really enjoyable conversation, it doesn't even register. There's some satisfaction to be had when you slurp sometimes
    Yeah, there may be some satisfaction for the person doing it, but for everyone else, it can be really annoying. You're right, it's only annoying when you tune into it, but if you tune into it, it is very difficult to tune out. I guess it's kind of like the (although less exaggerated) debate of whether the principle of majority rule should outweigh the principle of minority rights.
    • Community Assistant
    Online

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    ughh i hate slurping :afraid: it makes me so uncomfortable and weird
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by laurawatt)
    ughh i hate slurping :afraid: it makes me so uncomfortable and weird
    Yeah, and it can be really awkward lol
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    It's practically impossible not to slurp if your tea/coffee has just been made, and is boiling hot.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Less(e/o)n)
    It's practically impossible not to slurp if your tea/coffee has just been made, and is boiling hot.
    Surely you should just leave it to cool down then, instead of burning your mouth when slurping it?
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Koalifications)
    Surely you should just leave it to cool down then, instead of burning your mouth when slurping it?
    I'm impatient.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Less(e/o)n)
    I'm impatient.
    Theoretically, if someone gave you a hot cup of tea or coffee, and you were to drink it (slurping the drink), would you let it cool before drinking it to avoid slurping if a few people in the room asked you to do so? Whilst this debate is about slurping, it can also branch into whether the principle of majority rule should outweigh the principle of minority rights.
    Offline

    21
    (Original post by Koalifications)
    Surely you should just leave it to cool down then, instead of burning your mouth when slurping it?
    Tea tastes better boiling hot. I cannot stomach it any other way.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    21
    (Original post by Koalifications)
    Yeah, there may be some satisfaction for the person doing it, but for everyone else, it can be really annoying. You're right, it's only annoying when you tune into it, but if you tune into it, it is very difficult to tune out. I guess it's kind of like the (although less exaggerated) debate of whether the principle of majority rule should outweigh the principle of minority rights.
    Could you explain that please?
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Koalifications)
    Theoretically, if someone gave you a hot cup of tea or coffee, and you were to drink it (slurping the drink), would you let it cool before drinking it to avoid slurping if a few people in the room asked you to do so? Whilst this debate is about slurping, it can also branch into whether the principle of majority rule should outweigh the principle of minority rights.
    If my preference was that the coffee be that temperature, then they could theoretically **** right off :laugh:
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Lets ban slurping. Lock it up in the dreaded vault beside fireworks and Ann Robinson.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by starfab)
    Tea tastes better boiling hot. I cannot stomach it any other way.
    (Original post by gjd800)
    If my preference was that the coffee be that temperature, then they could theoretically **** right off :laugh:
    I wouldn't be able to drink scorching hot tea, but it is personal preference I guess lol.

    (Original post by starfab)
    Could you explain that please?
    Essentially, I mean that whether a majority decision should be able to oppress a right of someone to do something. In this specific example, whether five people telling someone to stop slurping should force them to stop.
    Offline

    21
    (Original post by Koalifications)
    Essentially, I mean that whether a majority decision should be able to oppress a right of someone to do something. In this specific example, whether five people telling someone to stop slurping should force them to stop.
    Well if it irritates someone, it can be stopped but whether the person wants to or not should be left entirely up to them. If they don't stop, those irritated are entitled to leave the room.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    12
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by starfab)
    Well if it irritates someone, it can be stopped but whether the person wants to or not should be left entirely up to them. If they don't stop, those irritated are entitled to leave the room.
    Let's say that you were slurping and thirty people asked you to stop - would you? Or would you tell them to leave the room?
    Offline

    21
    (Original post by Koalifications)
    Let's say that you were slurping and thirty people asked you to stop - would you? Or would you tell them to leave the room?
    Personally, I'd stop ofc. In fact, I only do the slurpy thing when I'm alone or with people it doesn't annoy because I'm like that. But I don't agree that another person 'has' to even if it annoyed these 30 people. Sure it would be quite inconsiderate of them not to though.
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    In private, knock yourself out.
    In public, it is as unacceptable as chewing with your mouth open.
    The only possible defence would be the argument that introducing air into the liquid heightens the taste experience (ie. wine or tea tasters) but we all know that the people who slurp their tea couldn't tell the difference between a Ceylon and an Orange Pekoe if they were delivered in labelled mugs.
    If it's too hot, let it cool first.

    However, the main issue here is actually the fallacious concept of "Room 101". It is not meant to be a depository for those thing we dislike or annoy us, so that we don't have to experience them. That was not Orwell's intention, rather the opposite. It is a room where someone else puts the things we fear specifically so we must experience them.
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by QE2)
    However, the main issue here is actually the fallacious concept of "Room 101". It is not meant to be a depository for those thing we dislike or annoy us, so that we don't have to experience them. That was not Orwell's intention, rather the opposite. It is a room where someone else puts the things we fear specifically so we must experience them.
    An act of contemptible depravity, or simply a means by which a person may strive for self-improvement?

    I find it a fascinating concept, personally.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Less(e/o)n)
    An act of contemptible depravity, or simply a means by which a person may strive for self-improvement?

    I find it a fascinating concept, personally.
    In the context of Orwell's original, I would suggest it is clearly the former. The idea was to break the individual and to make them betray those they love in an act of self-preservation.
 
 
 

1,971

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process
Useful resources
AtCTs

Ask the Community Team

Got a question about the site content or our moderation? Ask here.

Welcome Lounge

Welcome Lounge

We're a friendly bunch. Post here if you're new to TSR.

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.