Hey there! Sign in to join this conversationNew here? Join for free
x Turn on thread page Beta

Brittany Pettiborn Martin Sellner and Lauren Southern prevented from entering the UK watch

Announcements
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Thoughts? They were arrested and detained under schedule 7 of the terrorism act and refused entry into the UK.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    The tolerant and free United Kingdom only tolerates SJWs, feminists, LGBTQYRUAINDBQHZKZOK48437684HS, liberals, fundamentalist Muslims, economic migrants, Scottish nationalists, antifa, football hooligans, Russophobes, benefit scroungers, 'Lords', anyone who wants to open a chicken shop, and Irish Republicans.

    When will alt-light freelancers - who worship Tommy Robinson aka Hitler - realise that they are in fact Nazis and will therefore be denied entry into the otherwise tolerant and free United Kingdom?
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    dont really care about Tommy Robinson well know race baiter, whose violent marches attached muslim women and children across the country. Made them scared to leave their homes. He intentionally conflates Islam with extremists.

    The lack of due process bugs me.

    Same with taking citizenship away from people accused of fighting with ISIS in Syira(plenty of moderate US backed groups operating).
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hannah00)
    The lack of due process bugs me.

    Same with taking citizenship away from people accused of fighting with ISIS in Syira(plenty of moderate US backed groups operating).
    A lot of people who have fought for ISIS have been let in even these people haven't. Also they are misusing the terrorism act.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by karl pilkington)
    A lot of people who have fought for ISIS have been let in even these people haven't. Also they are misusing the terrorism act.
    and alot haven't been let in.

    Yes the terrorism act was missued

    but non british citizens do not have the RIGHT to enter the UK.
    I remember a dating coach was deported from Australia, even when it had nothing to do with extremism it just wasnt conductive to public good.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by karl pilkington)
    Thoughts? They were arrested and detained under schedule 7 of the terrorism act and refused entry into the UK.
    I dont think the part in bold is true, no one else is reporting this.

    What happened to them is no different than a person from china applying for a tourism visa and being refused
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hannah00)
    and alot haven't been let in.

    Yes the terrorism act was missued

    but non british citizens do not have the RIGHT to enter the UK.
    I remember a dating coach was deported from Australia, even when it had nothing to do with extremism it just wasnt conductive to public good.
    No but they have to be honest about why they are being refused entry. Not conducive to the public good often just means that they will cause protests or they have political beliefs the government doesn't agree with. They will let Saudi dictators and Islamist terrorist sympathizers in, however. People are rightly suspicious that the authorities' motivations are political rather than sensible government policy.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by karl pilkington)
    No but they have to be honest about why they are being refused entry. Not conducive to the public good often just means that they will cause protests or they have political beliefs the government doesn't agree with. They will let Saudi dictators and Islamist terrorist sympathizers in, however. People are rightly suspicious that the authorities' motivations are political rather than sensible government policy.
    The Home office was honest, about why they were not let it. Because they are racists and it wasnt in public interest to let them in.

    Not about political beliefs different to the govt(other wise only center right americans would be let in), its about them being extremists.

    Saudi Dictators came on Diplomatic Visa , and he didnt address the public or hand out leaflets.

    Terrorist sympathizers from saudi arabia or any other muslim country are NEVER NEVER NEVER issued visas. The only reason they dont get deported is because they never make it to the airport, (only people from countries with visa free can )

    No idea why your an apologists for people like tommy with such a vile racists views full, would love nothing better than stir up a race war
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hannah00)
    The Home office was honest, about why they were not let it. Because they are racists and it wasnt in public interest to let them in.

    Not about political beliefs different to the govt(other wise only center right americans would be let in), its about them being extremists.

    Saudi Dictators came on Diplomatic Visa , and he didnt address the public or hand out leaflets.

    Terrorist sympathizers from saudi arabia or any other muslim country are NEVER NEVER NEVER issued visas. The only reason they dont get deported is because they never make it to the airport, (only people from countries with visa free can )

    No idea why your an apologists for people like tommy with such a vile racists views full, would love nothing better than stir up a race war
    From what I understand, the three people in the title and Tommy Robinson oppose multiculturalism; they believe that Western countries, particularly Western European countries, are heading into the abyss if they continue to accept large numbers of individuals from the third world.

    Is that racist? If so, how many individuals from the third world do you believe a country like the UK can absorb per year? And for how many years?

    Additionally, do you consider Australia, New Zealand, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and Mexico to be racist for opposing the migration of large numbers of individuals from the third world into their societies?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hannah00)
    The Home office was honest, about why they were not let it. Because they are racists and it wasnt in public interest to let them in.

    Not about political beliefs different to the govt(other wise only center right americans would be let in), its about them being extremists.

    Saudi Dictators came on Diplomatic Visa , and he didnt address the public or hand out leaflets.

    Terrorist sympathizers from saudi arabia or any other muslim country are NEVER NEVER NEVER issued visas. The only reason they dont get deported is because they never make it to the airport, (only people from countries with visa free can )

    No idea why your an apologists for people like tommy with such a vile racists views full, would love nothing better than stir up a race war
    They are not racists they are nationalists and fight against Islam and multiculturism
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    They will let this guy in as an 'asylum seeker' but won't let people in to give a speech

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-43318098
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    This article sums up my thoughts well

    http://www.breitbart.com/london/2018...o-free-speech/
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    It was those on the right that wanted to ban foreigners that hold extreme views incompatible with British values.

    Only they are now giving the impression that we should let in those who hold extreme views that they approve of.
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sulfolobus)
    It was those on the right that wanted to ban foreigners that hold extreme views incompatible with British values.

    Only they are now giving the impression that we should let in those who hold extreme views that they approve of.
    Could you give an example of an ‘extreme view’ expressed by Lauren Southern? I don’t know anything about the other two
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    14
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Sulfolobus)
    It was those on the right that wanted to ban foreigners that hold extreme views incompatible with British values.
    Banning people who support the ideology of Islamic State is not a right/left issue, it is a right/wrong one. A matter of self defence, too, since they seek to murder us in the streets.

    Or do YOU think we should allow foreigners who hold allegiance to IS into our country???

    (Original post by Sulfolobus)
    Only they are now giving the impression that we should let in those who hold extreme views that they approve of.
    The individual banned was due to give a lecture on free speech (ironic huh?). That is not a view incompatible with British values, that is the very definition of British values.
    Offline

    9
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Stalin)
    When will alt-light freelancers - who worship Tommy Robinson aka Hitler - realise that they are in fact Nazis and therefore will be denied entry in the otherwise tolerant and free United Kingdom?
    Please tell me you're joking?

    Marxism has taken over the West. National identity has to go. Being able to retain your traditional culture is xenophobic and racist and needs the antidote mutli-culturalism until no single race has a demographic advantage, so then we arrive at precise equality, racial harmony and perfect diversity. Heathen on earth.

    It's a fantastical ****ing mental virus. Stopping this woman coming into the country but a guy who banned in Pakistan for being too extreme in his practise of Islam was let in to do a circuit of UK Mosques.


    And look at these mongs. They see nothing wrong it because they swallowed all the state programming have no idea about reality.

    This should be the last straw in this country. I only wish I could set up a non-partisan non-for-profit to organize some kind of resistance and create pressure groups, and crowd-fund to be able to sue the police for Stasi like abuse of their powers like this, and stop the deliberate propagandizing of children that is becoming ever worse.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Underscore__)
    Could you give an example of an ‘extreme view’ expressed by Lauren Southern? I don’t know anything about the other two
    I have no idea about her views as I have better things to do with my time than watching people on YouTube. If you disagree with the decision, contact your MP.
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by generallee)
    Banning people who support the ideology of Islamic State is not a right/left issue, it is a right/wrong one. A matter of self defence, too, since they seek to murder us in the streets.

    Or do YOU think we should allow foreigners who hold allegiance to IS into our country???



    The individual banned was due to give a lecture on free speech (ironic huh?). That is not a view incompatible with British values, that is the very definition of British values.
    If you disagree with the decision, believe the legislation is unfair, or think this is some kind of assault on free speech, then start lobbying the Conservative government. I'm almost certain you won't.
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by hannah00)
    dont really care about Tommy Robinson well know race baiter
    No he isn't. Never seen anything he's done or said that could be described as that. Please provide an example.

    whose violent marches attached muslim women and children across the country. Made them scared to leave their homes.
    Don't think he's ever been violent on a march other than I think one time when he punched a Nazi. An actual Nazi btw, not someone with conservative opinions.

    If people who attend the march are violent, that's not Tommy's fault. and he left the EDL anyway.

    He intentionally conflates Islam with extremists.
    That's vague.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Underground906)
    Please tell me you're joking?

    Marxism has taken over the West. National identity has to go. Being able to retain your traditional culture is xenophobic and racist and needs the antidote mutli-culturalism until no single race has a demographic advantage, so then we arrive at precise equality, racial harmony and perfect diversity. Heathen on earth.

    It's a fantastical ****ing mental virus. Stopping this woman coming into the country but a guy who banned in Pakistan for being too extreme in his practise of Islam was let in to do a circuit of UK Mosques.


    And look at these mongs. They see nothing wrong it because they swallowed all the state programming have no idea about reality.

    This should be the last straw in this country. I only wish I could set up a non-partisan non-for-profit to organize some kind of resistance and create pressure groups, and crowd-fund to be able to sue the police for Stasi like abuse of their powers like this, and stop the deliberate propagandizing of children that is becoming ever worse.
    Do you even sarcasm, bro?
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
TSR Support Team

We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.

Updated: March 22, 2018
Poll
Do you like carrot cake?
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.