Turn on thread page Beta

Could Airstrikes against Russia work? watch

    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Could airstrikes stop Russia from chemical attacks on Salisbury and Britain?

    If Russian military bases, air bases and stetegic sites are attacked could that stop Putin doing these things?

    The US attacked Syria for using chemical weapons last year so why not attack Russia.

    The only problem is do we really want to alienate Russia when they could be our only friends in Europe after Brexit. It’s difficult.
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)

    The only problem is do we really want to alienate Russia when they could be our only friends in Europe after Brexit. It’s difficult.
    What exactly is difficult about this? Sure, airstrikes could stop it. They could also result in far more attacks. Having a bigger stick can be effective. Using your stick to poke a hornets nest probably won't go so well though. The answer is not to further piss off the people attacking you, especially when they prove what lengths they'll go to.

    Also probably best not to speculate on these sorts of things. We can all think one way or the other but it's not responsible to suggest attacks on a country without actual proof. Luckily the general public doesn't get to decide these things
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    Could airstrikes stop Russia from chemical attacks on Salisbury and Britain?

    If Russian military bases, air bases and stetegic sites are attacked could that stop Putin doing these things?

    The US attacked Syria for using chemical weapons last year so why not attack Russia.

    The only problem is do we really want to alienate Russia when they could be our only friends in Europe after Brexit. It’s difficult.
    How do you dream up this garbage?

    No air strikes would be close to a declaration of war and supported by no one

    You seem to forget that Russia is the second largest nuclear power..
    It also has one of the largest armed forces in the world.

    Your examiners are in for a treat this summer.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Acsel)
    What exactly is difficult about this? Sure, airstrikes could stop it. They could also result in far more attacks. Having a bigger stick can be effective. Using your stick to poke a hornets nest probably won't go so well though. The answer is not to further piss off the people attacking you, especially when they prove what lengths they'll go to.

    Also probably best not to speculate on these sorts of things. We can all think one way or the other but it's not responsible to suggest attacks on a country without actual proof. Luckily the general public doesn't get to decide these things
    All airstrikes need to do is show Russia we are not a pushover. All it needs to be is bombing a few runways, military aircraft hangers and that’s it. There will never be any intention of killing any personnel, just damaging their equipment.
    • Section Leader
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Section Leader
    Diplomatically, it would make the situation far worse. Which is never good thing.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    Oh you imbecile
    Offline

    13
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    All airstrikes need to do is show Russia we are not a pushover. All it needs to be is bombing a few runways, military aircraft hangers and that’s it. There will never be any intention of killing any personnel, just damaging their equipment.
    Aye just wait until the middle of the night until everyone's left and drop a few bombs on some bases that'll do and definitely not severely piss them off
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    All airstrikes need to do is show Russia we are not a pushover. All it needs to be is bombing a few runways, military aircraft hangers and that’s it. There will never be any intention of killing any personnel, just damaging their equipment.
    And they will retaliate.

    Sure, the chemical attacks are despicable, but your Airstrike plan will create more problems that it will solve.
    • Community Assistant
    • PS Reviewer
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    PS Reviewer
    Russia has wolfdogs in their army apparently
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    The US attacked Syria for using chemical weapons last year so why not attack Russia.
    Gee I wonder. Maybe the fact Russia has nuclear weapons accompanied with the most advanced nuclear-delivery systems and missiles in the world and that any attack on Russian territory would lead to the total annihilation of the United States.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by 999tigger)
    How do you dream up this garbage?

    No air strikes would be close to a declaration of war and supported by no one

    You seem to forget that Russia is the second largest nuclear power..
    It also has one of the largest armed forces in the world.

    Your examiners are in for a treat this summer.
    I've almost missed this lunatic
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    All airstrikes need to do is show Russia we are not a pushover. All it needs to be is bombing a few runways, military aircraft hangers and that’s it. There will never be any intention of killing any personnel, just damaging their equipment.
    How are you proposing to get safely in and out of their airspace?
    Offline

    10
    ReputationRep:
    I second this plan, and may I suggest we send James Bond to assassinate Putin?
    • Community Assistant
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    Community Assistant
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    All airstrikes need to do is show Russia we are not a pushover. All it needs to be is bombing a few runways, military aircraft hangers and that’s it. There will never be any intention of killing any personnel, just damaging their equipment.
    And then they retaliate. Brilliant idea /sarcasm
    • Political Ambassador
    Offline

    18
    ReputationRep:
    Political Ambassador
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    All airstrikes need to do is show Russia we are not a pushover. All it needs to be is bombing a few runways, military aircraft hangers and that’s it. There will never be any intention of killing any personnel, just damaging their equipment.
    Oh yes and they respond with their numerically superior Air Force "**** off comrade, now eat our bombs"
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by DJKL)
    How are you proposing to get safely in and out of their airspace?
    Stealth bombers if the RAF have any and if not they could attack Russia’s western county of Kaliningrad from bases in Poland. It’s not that far.
    Offline

    19
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    Stealth bombers if the RAF have any and if not they could attack Russia’s western county of Kaliningrad from bases in Poland. It’s not that far.
    It's fair to say you're no Tom Clancy...
    Offline

    20
    ReputationRep:
    No-one can defeat the Red Army
    Offline

    17
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Ambitious1999)
    All it needs to be is bombing a few runways, military aircraft hangers and that’s it. There will never be any intention of killing any personnel, just damaging their equipment.
    I'm only fairly certain of this, but I don't think the Russian military shuts down at night time.

    There might still be some personnel on base when we bombed them.
    • Very Important Poster
    Offline

    19
    Very Important Poster
    (Original post by Drewski)
    I've almost missed this lunatic
    Cant say the same. I have to assume troll as the other option is too depressing.
 
 
 
Poll
Who is most responsible for your success at university
Useful resources

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.