The Student Room Group

Bar Society

Barristers (current or future),

I have realised that there is a TSR Law Society but not a TSR Bar Society.
So I have created one, which I hope will become a reunion for those considering approaching the bar and becoming barristers. We can compare chambers, bar schools, and discuss pupillage etc...



Also vote here: Which one of the four Inns of Courts?



Members

a fine line

Ad-Alta

Bagration

braceface

BrassPioneer

calamityx

coffe_e

danfel

Duke_E

Erradhadh

FCDjorkaeff

Helen4Morrissey

Javindo

Kanis

krazykeys

LawGurrl

lawstudent17

Legal_Jim

LegendKiller377

Lord Hysteria

LUFCsuperstar

Nana_Julia

NewRight

pcok

Peelprincess

petite_chaperon_rose

Pippaaa

RedDragon

rodneyk

Rudrax

sal paradise

Sexy Wise Guy

Solemn Wanderer

Stealth-Mode

stef.strawbs.123

The Lyceum

theanalyst

vira

Wangers

wisden14

Scroll to see replies

Solemn Wanderer
Done.


Hi
Are you a barrister at the moment? or planning to be? :smile:
Solemn Wanderer
Planning to be, yes. :smile:

cool which inn ?
are you at uni?
Why do some unis have separate law soc and bar soc? Nottingham only just started doing it this year and, tbh, it just seems like a pointless division as there is nothing extra happening to what used to happen under the combined law soc :s-smilie:.
Reply 4
I'm probably being an absolute spazmod, but can you link us?
It doesn't seem to have shown up in the Societies section...
Count me in.

Lewisy Boy: i guess that is entirely dependent on the uni in question. In theory, they are supposed to arrange more functions with chambers/barristers/trials etc.... I haven't attended any arranged by the (very new) bar society in my uni yet, but they have promised the above
Ad-Alta
I'm probably being an absolute spazmod, but can you link us?
It doesn't seem to have shown up in the Societies section...

i just need a loads of people 10+ to be interested before its established , so spread the word !
Lewisy-boy
Why do some unis have separate law soc and bar soc? Nottingham only just started doing it this year and, tbh, it just seems like a pointless division as there is nothing extra happening to what used to happen under the combined law soc :s-smilie:.


are you planning on joining the TSR Bar Society?
I think it will be quite cool as we can discuss loads of barriestery things ...
Reply 8
Could be a good idea rather than having loads of barrister-related threads that not many people are interested in.
Lush Law
Could be a good idea rather than having loads of barrister-related threads that not many people are interested in.

so can i put you down as a 'member'?
Reply 10
yup.
Please let me join! I'm starting at Oxford in October and hope ultimately to be a human rights barrister.
jismith1989
Please let me join! I'm starting at Oxford in October and hope ultimately to be a human rights barrister.


Just out of interest, why Human Rights?

What kind of cases do you envisage yourself working on?
Stealth-Mode
Just out of interest, why Human Rights?

What kind of cases do you envisage yourself working on?


maybe because he's passionate about human rights?
What kind of cases = maybe involving human rights ??
Avada_Kedavra
maybe because he's passionate about human rights?
What kind of cases = maybe involving human rights ??


Holding such a passion does not necessitate that one would work as a Human Rights Barrister, does it?

In the UK at this moment in time, most cases pertaining Human Rights are often over quite trivial matters where a person is inconvenienced and wants their own way, which can conveniently be hidden behind the illusion of some kind of grave infringement of a fundamental right granted to humanity. The real infringements of such a grave nature tend to happen in less developed countries.

Hence, my curiosity.
Stealth-Mode
Holding such a passion does not necessitate that one would work as a Human Rights Barrister, does it?

In the UK at this moment in time, most cases pertaining Human Rights are often, over quite trivial matters where a person is inconvenienced and wants their own way, which can conveniently be hidden behind the illusion of some kind of grave infringement on a fundamental right granted to humanity. The real infringements of such a grave nature tend to happen in less developed countries.

Hence, my curiosity.


I see ... I thought your post pefore was sarcastic ... but now I get what your saying.

I think when it comes to human rights .. often it is perceived that they will involve some "true" deprivation of human rights - like torture, but human rights are often pushed aside in less obvious means but i think if a person has a true passion in human rights then perhaps working in the Council of Europe is more suitable than the bar.
For those who are not studying the LLB, would appropriate work experience within the field of their current studies be helpful in admissions to chambers etc? I'm hoping to study criminology with a view to work with the Home Office, civil service and the like, and an internship within the criminal justice field is something I'm hoping to do. Obviously, I'll be converting to law etc.
I help represent asylum seekers, and those claims are almost exclusively based on Art 3, 6, 10. Considering the stakes involved, which are quite often death if returned to the country of origin, I would say the cases concern more than mere trivialities.
Solemn Wanderer
I don't agree. Even the Naomi Campbell case involved a very grave invasion of privacy. The case involving indefinite detention of non-deportable foreign nationals had even greater matters at stake, as did the one about allowing the Home Secretary to set murderers' minimum terms. (I am sure you will forgive me replacing citations to the law reports with titles resembling Friends episodes. :wink:)

I don't really see the basis on which you made this comment.


I don't think the Naomi Campbell is one that constitutes a grave Human Right Breach. She was just embarrassed. Fair-Doo's, but, meh- i won't loose any sleep.

The detention case, yes i see your point, yet i think this caliber of seriousness is one of the few exceptions to the rule.

The murder minimum-tariff case, somewhere in-between..although, I see that as having more constitutional significance than Human Right...Just my opinion, of course....

My basis for the comment: too many people spout an infringement of Human Rights as the basis for claiming that they are harshly done by..e.g. the case Booth had taken on not too long ago about the club owner claiming that the smoking ban was...yes you guessed it- against human rights! Or the Begum case for further example....most of the cases i come across seem rather more trivial than many wide-eyed, green, idealist aspiring Human Rights Lawyer would imagine them (and i include myself in that bracket btw- so...:redface: - maybe past tense/maybe not).
Evil_Genius
I help represent asylum seekers, and those claims are almost exclusively based on Art 3, 6, 10. Considering the stakes involved, which are quite often death if returned to the country of origin, I would say the cases concern more than mere trivialities.


Well i'm sure we'd all claim imminent death/torture/ if facing deportation, as have many yet uninjured deportees.... Don't get me wrong, I know that there are a significant amount in which the claim is a stark reality, but i just take task that these genuine cases are the majority on all Human Rights cases...- I may be wrong- but i have no stats to prove either way

What role do you work in, out of innocent curiosity?