Syrian missiles. Encouraging WW3?

Watch
ReadilySalted
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#1
Report Thread starter 2 years ago
#1
Do you think it's right how UK, US and France are getting involved in Syrian issues and getting in the way of Vladimir Putin? Do you think this is all heightening tension and encouraging war? Do you think it's right how Theresa May is also getting involved in this and allowed the permission of British military to be a part of this issue?

Would like to know what all you guys think about it?
0
reply
999tigger
Badges: 19
#2
Report 2 years ago
#2
(Original post by ReadilySalted)
Do you think it's right how UK, US and France are getting involved in Syrian issues and getting in the way of Vladimir Putin? Do you think this is all heightening tension and encouraging war? Do you think it's right how Theresa May is also getting involved in this and allowed the permission of British military to be a part of this issue?

Would like to know what all you guys think about it?

If they have evidence he has been using chemical weapons, then yes.

It isnt encouraging WW3.

Do you think using nerve gas on civilians is ok?
0
reply
higgs334
Badges: 13
Rep:
?
#3
Report 2 years ago
#3
This whole WW3 thing is a bandwagon. No one likes war, no one wants war. No one really ever "wins" a war.

If Russia starts a war over this, that's their own doing. Limited strikes have existed as long as western imperialism in the 20th century has.
0
reply
username3782690
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#4
Report 2 years ago
#4
(Original post by 999tigger)
If they have evidence he has been using chemical weapons, then yes.

It isnt encouraging WW3.

Do you think using nerve gas on civilians is ok?
It's funny where people draw the line.
They are fine with people getting bombed, shot, stabbed(I'm looking at you Israel) even supporting the perpetrators but when chemical weapons are involved suddenly they need to intervene.
Nerve gas or not, they all end up dead.
1
reply
username3782690
Badges: 16
Rep:
?
#5
Report 2 years ago
#5
(Original post by higgs334)
This whole WW3 thing is a bandwagon. No one likes war, no one wants war. No one really ever "wins" a war.

If Russia starts a war over this, that's their own doing. Limited strikes have existed as long as western imperialism in the 20th century has.
Pretty sure the allies won WW2 tho.
0
reply
999tigger
Badges: 19
#6
Report 2 years ago
#6
(Original post by FrankGary)
It's funny where people draw the line.
They are fine with people getting bombed, shot, stabbed(I'm looking at you Israel) even supporting the perpetrators but when chemical weapons are involved suddenly they need to intervene.
Nerve gas or not, they all end up dead.
It is, but one is illegal and the other is not.
Its a good idea to deter such weapons because they have the scope to kill many thousands in a way that is beyond conventional munitions.
0
reply
X

Quick Reply

Attached files
Write a reply...
Reply
new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

See more of what you like on
The Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

Personalise

New lockdown - Do you agree schools and universities should remain open?

Yes (6)
60%
No (3)
30%
I don't know (1)
10%

Watched Threads

View All