Hi guys, I’m trying to decide between UCL and Bristol for History (both AAA). Originally I thought UCL, but I went back to Bristol so now they’re quite equal.
UCL:
- Better course (class size and contact hours)
- Better location
- Slight edge in terms of reputation
Bristol:
- A lot cheaper/nicer accommodation
- Friendlier and more welcoming
- More personal (London can be lonely)
Both are equally as hard to travel back home. My Dad keeps saying that:
1. The degree matters more than the uni
2. The significance of the uni you went to dwindles further down the line
3. Generally, if you’re comfortable in the place, you’ll exceed more (more likely to be comfortable in Bristol)
Both are really good so what are people’s opinions/experiences? Is that prestigious edge worth the money for UCL? I’m genuinely torn between the two.