Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    Has anyone got predictions for the sources of law paper for 2018, a quick reply would be great!
    Online

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by smithben)
    Has anyone got predictions for the sources of law paper for 2018, a quick reply would be great!
    Surely not statutory interpretation
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    No I would not think so, my own predictions were either EU law with judicial precedent OR Deligated legislation and Judicial president
    Offline

    3
    ReputationRep:
    dont forget law reform: the role of the law commission and the problems they encounter in fulfilling their role
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    My teachers predicted Judicial precedent and statutory interpretation despite it having been repeated for many years. Judicial precedent hasn’t been on the paper since 2014!
    Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play
    Offline

    1
    ReputationRep:
    any last min topics everyone is looking at?
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Good luck let’s all hope JP is on it
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    Well it was DL and JP hoping it went well anyone know how they answered the scenario question?
    Online

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by smithben)
    Well it was DL and JP hoping it went well anyone know how they answered the scenario question?
    I did the 2nd one. Finished with time to spare so I was a tad suspicious
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SethMtv)
    I did the 2nd one. Finished with time to spare so I was a tad suspicious
    What did u put for Q2 I put; reversing, overfilling and distinguishing but I think it may have been overusing, overfilling, distinguishing?
    Online

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by smithben)
    What did u put for Q2 I put; reversing, overfilling and distinguishing but I think it may have been overusing, overfilling, distinguishing?
    I forgot what the question was, but I know for the last one it was distinguishing for sure.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by SethMtv)
    I forgot what the question was, but I know for the last one it was distinguishing for sure.
    What about Q1 cuz I only briefly described Ratio and Obtier and then talked about reversing and overruling more
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Didn’t like the last one how it only asked for advantages of JP it should have asked for both arguments
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    I didn’t get C part 1 did it ask for the development of the practice statement so the London street tramways cases 1898 then the practice statement 1966, then Conway v rimmer and shivpuri for criminal, pepper v heart for Hansard then finally Austin v Southwark showing that it was transferred to the Supreme Court under the constitution reform act, is that correct??
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Or was it asking for something else?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lewis199913)
    I didn’t get C part 1 did it ask for the development of the practice statement so the London street tramways cases 1898 then the practice statement 1966, then Conway v rimmer and shivpuri for criminal, pepper v heart for Hansard then finally Austin v Southwark showing that it was transferred to the Supreme Court under the constitution reform act, is that correct??
    I think so I just talked about everything for the practice statement but the questions were worded weirdly in my opinion
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Yeah it was asking about the practice directions which I’ve never heard of I just presumed it meant practice statement and wrote about the development of it and how it was used in cases, and how there’s a reluctance to use it.
    Offline

    2
    ReputationRep:
    Also was the last 5 mark question, distinguishing?
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    6
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lewis199913)
    Also was the last 5 mark question, distinguishing?
    Can u remember your other scenario answers?
    Online

    11
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Lewis199913)
    Didn’t like the last one how it only asked for advantages of JP it should have asked for both arguments
    I wish they asked for both arguments too, but I managed to think of 7 solid advantages thankfully
 
 
 

2,617

students online now

800,000+

Exam discussions

Find your exam discussion here

Poll
Should predicted grades be removed from the uni application process
Help with your A-levels

All the essentials

The adventure begins mug

Student life: what to expect

What it's really like going to uni

Rosette

Essay expert

Learn to write like a pro with our ultimate essay guide.

Uni match

Uni match

Our tool will help you find the perfect course for you

Study planner

Create a study plan

Get your head around what you need to do and when with the study planner tool.

Study planner

Resources by subject

Everything from mind maps to class notes.

Hands typing

Degrees without fees

Discover more about degree-level apprenticeships.

A student doing homework

Study tips from A* students

Students who got top grades in their A-levels share their secrets

Study help links and info

Can you help? Study help unanswered threadsRules and posting guidelines

Groups associated with this forum:

View associated groups

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.