# How many marks would you give this?

Watch
Announcements
#1
Briefly outline how two variables investigated by Asch were found to affect conformity (4 marks)

One variable investigated by Asch was group size. He wanted to see how the size of the majority could affect the rates of conformity. These variations ranged from 1 confederate to 15 confederates. With 1 confederate, the real participants conformed on 3% of the critical trials, with 2 confederates the real participants conformed on 12.8% of the critical trials while with 3 confederates, the real participants conformed on 32% of the critical trials, which is the same percentage from Asch’s original experiment when 7 confederates was used. He found that increasing the confederates beyond 3 made little difference to conformity levels. This shows that a small majority is not sufficient enough for conformity influence, but does not necessarily need more than 3.

Another variable investigated by Asch was unanimity (the extent to which all the members of a group agree). He wanted to know if the presence of a non-conforming/dissenting person would affect the real participants’ ability to conform. By introducing 1 confederate who disagreed with the others, he found that it led to reduced conformity levels. The new confederate occasionally switched between correct and incorrect answers, finding that both led to a decrease in conformity - regardless of whether the answer was correct or not. In one variation, a confederate was instructed to give a correct answer throughout and conformity dropped to 5%. While in another variation, one confederate gave a different, incorrect answer to the majority and conformity levels still dropped significantly to 9%, although slightly higher than the condition with the correct answer. This shows that that if a real participant has support for their belief, then they are more likely to resist the pressure to conform as this is the answer they believe to be true, as they lack the knowledge and genuinely believe the majority is correct, or fear social ridicule.
0
2 years ago
#2
I would give it 4/4, so good job. BUT you could have written a LOT less and still got 4/4. Time is very limited in exams, so on shorter questions like this, you need to be accurate but concise too. Each of the two paragraphs could have been half as short and still got enough description in to gain full marks. Remember it says outline in the question, so it's only requiring you to describe what Asch did to look at two variables. By saving time on shorter questions, you'll have longer to spend on the more evaluate/analysis parts of longer questions. Good luck with everything!
1
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Do you have the space and resources you need to succeed in home learning?

Yes I have everything I need (76)
63.33%
I don't have everything I need (44)
36.67%