The Student Room Group

Fp2 complex transformation

FA296E9D-7FFA-4723-B187-9CB3F4478F26.jpg.jpeg

Can someone please explain part c . I don’t get what to do . What’s the easiest way to go about this question. we get a gradient of 1 according to exam solutions . I don’t get this though . How does the arg give us a negative number and how does this help us . If we are trying to find the intersection between the circle and the half line theta =-3/4pi are we supposed to get the half line in Cartesian form and sub into the equation of the circle . How can we change its form ?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 2
Original post by Angels1234
FA296E9D-7FFA-4723-B187-9CB3F4478F26.jpg.jpeg

Can someone please explain part c . I don’t get what to do . What’s the easiest way to go about this question. we get a gradient of 1 according to exam solutions . I don’t get this though . How does the arg give us a negative number and how does this help us . If we are trying to find the intersection between the circle and the half line theta =-3/4pi are we supposed to get the half line in Cartesian form and sub into the equation of the circle . How can we change its form ?

Firstly you need a sketch - I assume you have one? It would have been useful if you posted it.

You do need the cartesian equation of the line. The argument is 3π4-\frac{3\pi}{4} which is halfway between π2-\frac{\pi}{2} and π-\pi. So this half-line goes "south-west" if you like. Can you see why the gradient of the line is 1?
Reply 3
Original post by Notnek
Firstly you need a sketch - I assume you have one? It would have been useful if you posted it.

You do need the cartesian equation of the line. The argument is 3π4-\frac{3\pi}{4} which is halfway between π2-\frac{\pi}{2} and π-\pi. So this half-line goes "south-west" if you like. Can you see why the gradient of the line is 1?


My drawings a bit wrong . I think my line should be more towards the left and I should of drawn a dash line parallel to the x axis
https://postimg.cc/image/futeem04n/
Reply 4
Original post by Angels1234
My drawings a bit wrong . I think my line should be more towards the left and I should of drawn a dash line parallel to the x axis
https://postimg.cc/image/futeem04n/

You need a better diagram. The radius of the circle is 20\sqrt{20} which is between 4 and 5. And the horizontal distance between the centre (4,-2) and the point (6,0) is only 2 units. But look where you've marked the point (6,0) on your diagram.

Try to draw something better and post it again.
Original post by Notnek
Firstly you need a sketch - I assume you have one? It would have been useful if you posted it.

You do need the cartesian equation of the line. The argument is 3π4-\frac{3\pi}{4} which is halfway between π2-\frac{\pi}{2} and π-\pi. So this half-line goes "south-west" if you like. Can you see why the gradient of the line is 1?


isn't the gradient -1?
Reply 6
Original post by AspiringUnderdog
isn't the gradient -1?

No, if you've drawn a correct diagram it should clearly be 1 and not -1.
Original post by Notnek
No, if you've drawn a correct diagram it should clearly be 1 and not -1.


-3pi/4 goes downwards though so it must be a negative gradient
Reply 8
Original post by AspiringUnderdog
-3pi/4 goes downwards though so it must be a negative gradient

You're getting confused by what gradient means. Look at your line and ignore everything else on the diagram. Isn't it clear that the line has a positive gradient?
Original post by Notnek
You're getting confused by what gradient means. Look at your line and ignore everything else on the diagram. Isn't it clear that the line has a positive gradient?


Okay so the gradient is 1 fine I've realised. What can you do with that though?
Reply 10
@Angels1234 Looking at this question again, there's a simple geometric approach that I'd recommend instead of using algebra. But you need a correct diagram first.
Reply 11
Original post by AspiringUnderdog
Okay so the gradient is 1 fine I've realised. What can you do with that though?

You should be able to then form a cartesian equation of the line since you know if goes through (6,0). Then you can solve the equations simultaneously to find the point of intersection.

But there's a quicker way by considering the geometry as I mentioned above.
Original post by Notnek
You should be able to then form a cartesian equation of the line since you know if goes through (6,0). Then you can solve the equations simultaneously to find the point of intersection.

But there's a quicker way by considering the geometry as I mentioned above.


If the half line crosses the centre of the circle is that correct?
Original post by Notnek
You should be able to then form a cartesian equation of the line since you know if goes through (6,0). Then you can solve the equations simultaneously to find the point of intersection.

But there's a quicker way by considering the geometry as I mentioned above.


https://postimg.cc/image/ooow9aruv/ is this okay ?
Reply 14
Original post by AspiringUnderdog
If the half line crosses the centre of the circle is that correct?

Yes that's right.
Original post by Notnek
Yes that's right.


tbh I'm still a bit stuck after that though
Reply 16

It's much better but needs to be improved to get all the marks in b). Firstly if you consider x=0 or y=0 you'll see the circle must pass through (0,0). Then your line should be 45 degrees from the vertical - your line is too steep.

Also (not sure if you need this to get all the marks), it's a line with gradient 1 so if you go 2 left and 2 down from (6,0) you get to (4,-2) so the line must pass through the centre of the circle.

Try one more time :smile:
Reply 17
Original post by AspiringUnderdog
tbh I'm still a bit stuck after that though

Where? Do you have the equation of the line?
Original post by Notnek
Where? Do you have the equation of the line?


Can you explain it geometrically without changing to cartesian?

In AQA it generally comes up and tbh I'm not feeling another method. Sorry.
Reply 19
Original post by AspiringUnderdog
Can you explain it geometrically without changing to cartesian?

In AQA it generally comes up and tbh I'm not feeling another method. Sorry.

Even though there's often a faster geometric approach, you should really be able to use the algebra method. Once you've got the equations it's just GCSE algebra.

Geometric approach:

Spoiler


Spoiler


Let me know if you need more help.

Quick Reply

Latest