OCR Philosophy Panic! Exam today! Watch
With regards to what youve put about Hume are you sure all of that applies. The question was does he successfully argue observation does not prove God not whether Hume uses observation to not believe in God.
But it’s still a form of his own weakness in his failing in philosophical argument because of his lack of fully addressing obervasion properly and his perspective being read as mechinisation naturalism. This being an out weighing weakness compared to a priori approach and saying natural theology is false as entropy in thermodynamics disproves order and God. I thought think philosophy is subjective.