The Student Room Group

Scroll to see replies

Reply 1
Friction
Reply 2
friction
Reply 3
friction x resultant force, but would check with someone whos clued up about mechanics, but thats what I remember from M1.
Frater
friction x resultant force, but would check with someone whos clued up about mechanics, but thats what I remember from M1.

No, just friction.

(Incidentally, it's FμRF \leq \mu R, not necessarily F=μRF = \mu R unless the body is moving or about to move.)
Reply 5
Ok, so i cannot say then :

mu.R = ma ... as thats Force, correct?
Mos Def
Ok, so i cannot say then :

mu.R = ma ... as thats Force, correct?

Yeah, saying that would be wrong.
Reply 7
no i would be fine, assuming all other forces are in eqm
Reply 8
friction is a force

(frictional force)
Reply 9
So friction = ma during equilibrium? :s-smilie:
Mos Def
So friction = ma during equilibrium? :s-smilie:


No. 0 = ma, there's no resultant force as there's no acceleration.
Reply 11
Mos Def
So friction = ma during equilibrium? :s-smilie:
No, dont think of it that way. Friction=mu.R and
Resultant Force = ma.

If and only if your resultant force is the friction does ma = mu.R
Reply 12
Ahh right, cheers all
What that statement is saying is that the maximal value of friction is proportional to the normal reaction , but is always less than it (&#956; < 1) .This max value occurs when the particle is about to slip , so if it is slipping it is safe to assume f = f(max) = &#956;R
Reply 14
To avoid confusion, my teacher taught me to always write friction as Fr instead of F and I agree with him that it's more sensible.

Fr = mu * R when the object is in limiting equilibrium.

Fr = ma when friction is the only force acting on the object. This follows as Newton's second law says

F = ma (where F is the sum of all forces acting on the object)

And if Fr is the only force, then Fr = ma.
2^1/2
no i would be fine, assuming all other forces are in eqm

And when does that happen?! :s-smilie:

Friction can't act unless there are other forces acting.

Edit: wait, this is false. See later post for clarification. :p:
Reply 16
yes we are talking about a resultant here.

(in the one direction)
generalebriety
And when does that happen?! :s-smilie:

Friction can't act unless there are other forces acting.


What if theres a mass inclined to an angle at say theta degrees....and theres nothing pulling it the opposite way, so the only way it can move is downward and horizontally, friction is the only force acting and vertically, there is a normal reaction and a weight at mgsin(theta). Atleast thats what I remember from M1...I may be wrong but that was a situation where friction was the only force acting, horizontally anyway....[it is M1 though, not exactly rocket science so they do simplify the model :rolleyes: ]
Reply 18
fusionskd
What if theres a mass inclined to an angle at say theta degrees....and theres nothing pulling it the opposite way, so the only way it can move is downward and horizontally, friction is the only force acting and vertically, there is a normal reaction and a weight at mgsin(theta). Atleast thats what I remember from M1...I may be wrong but that was a situation where friction was the only force acting, horizontally anyway....[it is M1 though, not exactly rocket science so they do simplify the model :rolleyes: ]


Dont forget you have the component of weight which acts parallel to the plane...
The only situation I can think of where friction is the only {horizontal} force acting is; 'A hockey pog on ice{after a force has been applied to it}, it'll obviously slow down because the resultant force is the friction between the pog and the ice and thus mu.R=ma'.
bruceleej
Dont forget you have the component of weight which acts parallel to the plane...



Ah yes...yet another dumb moment for me there...:redface:

Just ignore me :p: