# Maths help! Exam in 2 days:(

Watch
Announcements

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

Can someone please help with 5 iii - I dunno what they mean in the ms when it says "Resolve horiz and establish tensions equal E1

Resolve vert to show inconsistency " -how are tensions equal horizontally?

http://mei.org.uk/files/papers/ouikyuj45y.pdf

Resolve vert to show inconsistency " -how are tensions equal horizontally?

http://mei.org.uk/files/papers/ouikyuj45y.pdf

0

reply

Report

#2

(Original post by

Can someone please help with 5 iii - I dunno what they mean in the ms when it says "Resolve horiz and establish tensions equal E1

Resolve vert to show inconsistency " -how are tensions equal horizontally?

http://mei.org.uk/files/papers/ouikyuj45y.pdf

**Kalabamboo**)Can someone please help with 5 iii - I dunno what they mean in the ms when it says "Resolve horiz and establish tensions equal E1

Resolve vert to show inconsistency " -how are tensions equal horizontally?

http://mei.org.uk/files/papers/ouikyuj45y.pdf

Sines cancel and so tensions are equal.

1

reply

(Original post by

Resolving horizontally for the box we have:

Sines cancel and so tensions are equal.

**ghostwalker**)Resolving horizontally for the box we have:

Sines cancel and so tensions are equal.

0

reply

Report

#4

**Kalabamboo**)

Can someone please help with 5 iii - I dunno what they mean in the ms when it says "Resolve horiz and establish tensions equal E1

Resolve vert to show inconsistency " -how are tensions equal horizontally?

http://mei.org.uk/files/papers/ouikyuj45y.pdf

For your second question, we're given that alpha = 60, which matches the 60 degree angle between the weight and BC ("String BC is at 60 degrees to the vertical"). Thus if we resolve, we get tension in AB * cos(90-60) = tension in BC * sin(60), so since cos(90-x) = sin(x) for all x, the trig terms cancel and we get tension in AB = tension in BC. Thus their vertical components will be equal and cancel out, just like their horizontal components, but therefore there will be a net force downwards from the weight, meaning that the box cannot be in equilibrium, as required.

0

reply

Report

#5

(Original post by

Thanks but I thought that the tensions AB and BC are the same anyway cause only the angle has changed - so the vertical or horizontal components must've changed to keep the tensions the same

**Kalabamboo**)Thanks but I thought that the tensions AB and BC are the same anyway cause only the angle has changed - so the vertical or horizontal components must've changed to keep the tensions the same

0

reply

(Original post by

In response to your first (general) question, it means that we show the horizontal components of the tensions in AB and BC to be equal, so there is no net horizontal force on the box, but there is a net vertical force, due to the weight as well as the vertical components of the two tensions.

For your second question, we're given that alpha = 60, which matches the 60 degree angle between the weight and BC ("String BC is at 60 degrees to the vertical". Thus if we resolve, we get tension in AB * cos(90-60) = tension in BC * sin(60), so since cos(90-x) = sin(x) for all x, the trig terms cancel and we get tension in AB = tension in BC. Thus their vertical components will be equal and cancel out, just like their horizontal components, but therefore there will be a net force downwards from the weight, meaning that the box cannot be in equilibrium, as required.

**Prasiortle**)In response to your first (general) question, it means that we show the horizontal components of the tensions in AB and BC to be equal, so there is no net horizontal force on the box, but there is a net vertical force, due to the weight as well as the vertical components of the two tensions.

For your second question, we're given that alpha = 60, which matches the 60 degree angle between the weight and BC ("String BC is at 60 degrees to the vertical". Thus if we resolve, we get tension in AB * cos(90-60) = tension in BC * sin(60), so since cos(90-x) = sin(x) for all x, the trig terms cancel and we get tension in AB = tension in BC. Thus their vertical components will be equal and cancel out, just like their horizontal components, but therefore there will be a net force downwards from the weight, meaning that the box cannot be in equilibrium, as required.

This bit's confusing cause we are told that they are not in equilibrium so we can't really equate them.

Here is what I've jot down on my paper -sorry if it's not a lot of progress . Can you please help me

oh it's not letting me post it for some reasonn

0

reply

Report

#7

(Original post by

Thanks! I think I am getting this but one thing that it is bugging me is why do you equate them like Ghostwalker did:

This bit's confusing cause we are told that they are not in equilibrium so we can't really equate them.

Here is what I've jot down on my paper -sorry if it's not a lot of progress . Can you please help me

oh it's not letting me post it for some reasonn

**Kalabamboo**)Thanks! I think I am getting this but one thing that it is bugging me is why do you equate them like Ghostwalker did:

This bit's confusing cause we are told that they are not in equilibrium so we can't really equate them.

Here is what I've jot down on my paper -sorry if it's not a lot of progress . Can you please help me

oh it's not letting me post it for some reasonn

__If alpha = 60__, then resolving horizontally the tensions must be equal.

Resolving vertically, the tensions cannot be equal - due to the weight of the box.

This is a contradiction, the tensions cannot be equal and not equal at the same time, hence alpha cannot be 60.

0

reply

Report

#8

**Kalabamboo**)

Thanks! I think I am getting this but one thing that it is bugging me is why do you equate them like Ghostwalker did:

This bit's confusing cause we are told that they are not in equilibrium so we can't really equate them.

Here is what I've jot down on my paper -sorry if it's not a lot of progress . Can you please help me

oh it's not letting me post it for some reasonn

0

reply

(Original post by

It's a proof by contradiction.

Resolving vertically, the tensions cannot be equal - due to the weight of the box.

This is a contradiction, the tensions cannot be equal and not equal at the same time, hence alpha cannot be 60.

**ghostwalker**)It's a proof by contradiction.

__If alpha = 60__, then resolving horizontally the tensions must be equal.Resolving vertically, the tensions cannot be equal - due to the weight of the box.

This is a contradiction, the tensions cannot be equal and not equal at the same time, hence alpha cannot be 60.

So we just say Tba and Tbc is the same despite the fact that an angle has changeed?

0

reply

(Original post by

We assume that the box is in equilibrium, and thus the net horizontal force should be 0. But then, from this assumption, we show that the net vertical force is non-zero, so the box is not in equilibrium, contradicting our initial assumption. Thus our initial assumption that the box is in equilibrium must have been wrong. It's a proof by contradiction.

**Prasiortle**)We assume that the box is in equilibrium, and thus the net horizontal force should be 0. But then, from this assumption, we show that the net vertical force is non-zero, so the box is not in equilibrium, contradicting our initial assumption. Thus our initial assumption that the box is in equilibrium must have been wrong. It's a proof by contradiction.

So we just say Tba and Tbc is the same despite the fact that an angle has changeed?

0

reply

Report

#11

(Original post by

Ah proof

So we just say Tba and Tbc is the same despite the fact that an angle has changeed?

**Kalabamboo**)Ah proof

So we just say Tba and Tbc is the same despite the fact that an angle has changeed?

1

reply

X

Page 1 of 1

Go to first unread

Skip to page:

### Quick Reply

Back

to top

to top