If you have integrated f(x) to F(x) is your new function the cumulative function? I.e. if in 2 parts, the 2nd part will also include the area under the curve for the first part? Hope that makes sense
edit: struggling to say exactly what I mean,
say if F(x) was defined in 2 parts, say one between 1<x<3 and one 4<x<7
If you wanted to find the probability that X is less than 6  would you only do F(6) in the 2nd function, or would you also do F(6) for the first function and add them?

jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 1
Last edited by jazz_xox_; 3 weeks ago at 21:12. 
Revision help in partnership with Birmingham City University

jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 2
I want to say that each 'section' of the function is only for that specific area under the curve, but then wouldn't that go against the idea of it being a cumulative function? Think I'm confusing myself here

TheYearNiner
 Follow
 26 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to TheYearNiner
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 3
Yes add them if it is less than 6. I'd explain better if it were a question. Don't forget Yates correction tomorrkw

jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 4
(Original post by TheYearNiner)
Yes add them if it is less than 6. I'd explain better if it were a question. Don't forget Yates correction tomorrkw
Usually the questions makes it clear what they're after (e.g. to add on the first section of the area under the curve to give the whole cumulative function) and I've not had trouble with it before but I'm really confusing myself now!
And thank you, I won't forget!! Are you doing the exam too? 
Prasiortle
 Follow
 9 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Prasiortle
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 5
(Original post by jazz_xox_)
If you have integrated f(x) to F(x) is your new function the cumulative function? I.e. if in 2 parts, the 2nd part will also include the area under the curve for the first part? Hope that makes sense
edit: struggling to say exactly what I mean,
say if F(x) was defined in 2 parts, say one between 1<x<3 and one 4<x<7
If you wanted to find the probability that X is less than 6  would you only do F(6) in the 2nd function, or would you also do F(6) for the first function and add them? 
TheYearNiner
 Follow
 26 followers
 20 badges
 Send a private message to TheYearNiner
Offline20ReputationRep: Follow
 6
(Original post by jazz_xox_)
Thank you, that's what I thought but then my friend was questioning me and I couldn't explain why.. so even though it's the 'cumulative' function, it doesn't necessarily include everything from 0, just in that section?
Usually the questions makes it clear what they're after (e.g. to add on the first section of the area under the curve to give the whole cumulative function) and I've not had trouble with it before but I'm really confusing myself now!
And thank you, I won't forget!! Are you doing the exam too? 
jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 7
(Original post by Prasiortle)
If f(x) is the probability density function, then F(x) is the cumulative distribution function. However, if f(x) is defined piecewise, then you will need to add the areas to get the total (cumulative area), so to find P(X <= k) where k is less than 3, you would just do F(k) in the 1st function; to find P(X <= k) where k is more than 3, you would have to do F(3) in the 1st function to get that total area, then F(k) in the 2nd function to get that area, and then add the two areas.
When you've written F(x) as multiple pieces, defined for difference x values, would you still call this the 'cumulative distribution function' or not? 
jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 8
(Original post by TheYearNiner)
Yeah I'm doing the exam but make sure you double check with textbook because I might be wrong I can be clumsy 
Prasiortle
 Follow
 9 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Prasiortle
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 9
(Original post by jazz_xox_)
Ahh that helps a lot thank you! So it's cumulative if it's just defined in one section, but if it's defined for multiple sections, you would have to combine them to find the overall cumulative function?
When you've written F(x) as multiple pieces, defined for difference x values, would you still call this the 'cumulative distribution function' or not?
Yes, if it's piecewise, you have to combine them. It's the same as how, e.g. if you're using a velocitytime graph that has one section between time 0 seconds and time 5 seconds, and another (different) section between time 5 seconds and time 10 seconds, and you want to find the value of t such that the displacement (i.e. area under the velocitytime graph) at time t seconds is 3 metres, and you know that this value of t is between 5 and 10, then you have to do the total area from time 0 seconds up to time 5 seconds, plus the area from time 5 seconds up to time t seconds, as this will give the total area under the graph from time 0 seconds up to time t seconds. 
 Follow
 10
I'm getting confused now haha. Can someone please put an example of this type up because I can't find an example of this type in the textbook?
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play 
jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 11
(Original post by Prasiortle)
It's still called a cumulative distribution function.
Yes, if it's piecewise, you have to combine them. It's the same as how, e.g. if you're using a velocitytime graph that has one section between time 0 seconds and time 5 seconds, and another (different) section between time 5 seconds and time 10 seconds, and you want to find the value of t such that the displacement (i.e. area under the velocitytime graph) at time t seconds is 3 metres, and you know that this value of t is between 5 and 10, then you have to do the total area from time 0 seconds up to time 5 seconds, plus the area from time 5 seconds up to time t seconds, as this will give the total area under the graph from time 0 seconds up to time t seconds. 
jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 12
(Original post by Devvo666)
I'm getting confused now haha. Can someone please put an example of this type up because I can't find an example of this type in the textbook?
http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects...BQPJUN14.PDF
7bi on this paper kind of helped me to understand it, in the way that you have to add on the first bit of the function 
Prasiortle
 Follow
 9 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Prasiortle
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 13
(Original post by jazz_xox_)
Okay it's starting to make a lot more sense If you were to define the cumulative distribution function for the 2nd section of the function only, would you still add on the area from the first part of the curve then? 
 Follow
 14
(Original post by jazz_xox_)
If you have integrated f(x) to F(x) is your new function the cumulative function? I.e. if in 2 parts, the 2nd part will also include the area under the curve for the first part? Hope that makes sense
edit: struggling to say exactly what I mean,
say if F(x) was defined in 2 parts, say one between 1<x<3 and one 4<x<7
If you wanted to find the probability that X is less than 6  would you only do F(6) in the 2nd function, or would you also do F(6) for the first function and add them? 
 Follow
 15
I don't understand how you get the shape of the graph for this question or the 2 parts to b. Can anyone help?
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple or Google Play 
Prasiortle
 Follow
 9 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Prasiortle
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 16
(Original post by Devvo666)
I don't understand how you get the shape of the graph for this question or the 2 parts to b. Can anyone help?
Anyway, to sketch the graph, just notice that is a quartic with double roots, and thus stationary points, at and (double roots due to the brackets being squared).
For (b)(i): We have , so , which by linearity of expectation becomes , and now you just have to substitute in your value of from part (a)(iii).
Then for (b)(ii): we have , and this time we apply the rule that when and are constants, , which can itself be derived from linearity of expectation. Thus we get , and again we just have to substitute in our value of from part (a)(iv).Last edited by Prasiortle; 3 weeks ago at 00:13. 
jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 17
(Original post by Prasiortle)
The cumulative distribution function is defined piecewise: for the first section, it's just the integral from the start point up to x of the first section of the probability density function; for the second section, it's the integral over the entire domain (start point up to end point) of the first section of the probability density function, plus the integral from the second section's start point up to x of the probability density function.
So if you’ve just integrated the second part of the function (ignoring the first part) is that just the area under that section of the curve?? 
jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 18
(Original post by Martha8)
F(x) by definition is the integral of f(x) from ve infinity up to x, so to find the probability that x < 6, you just need to do F(6) in the 2nd function; the height described by the first function (ie in this case the probability that x < 3) is accounted for as the '+c' when you integrate from f(x) > F(x) for the 2nd function. 
Prasiortle
 Follow
 9 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to Prasiortle
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 19
(Original post by jazz_xox_)
Ahh okay .. so you wouldn’t need to add on the first section of Fx at all? 
jazz_xox_
 Follow
 22 followers
 13 badges
 Send a private message to jazz_xox_
 Thread Starter
Offline13ReputationRep: Follow
 20
(Original post by Prasiortle)
You cannot get the cumulative distribution function as one thing, because you have to know which section of the graph your ending value falls into in order to work out the area. If your ending value falls in the first section, you will need to add the entire area of the first section to a certain area under the second section.
So my understanding now is, the whole collection of functions is the cumulative distribution function, and to find an area below a point in the section section, you also need to add on the area under the curve for the first section ? I don’t know how I’ve never noticed that this didn’t make sense to me before !
 1
 2
Related discussions
 Difference between cumulative distribution function & ...
 Finding the median from the cumulative distribution function
 Cumalative distribution function
 Cumulative distribution function
 Cumalative distribution
 S1 cumulative distribution function
 Statistics cumulative distribution
 Maths help
 Cumulative distribution function median etc
 Edexcel S2; Cumulative Distribution Function
Related university courses

Mathematics and Statistical Science
UCL

Classical Studies and Mathematics
University of St Andrews

Financial Mathematics
Loughborough University

Mathematics
Birkbeck, University of London

Mathematics and Music with a Year Abroad
Cardiff University

Mathematics
University of Chichester

Financial Mathematics and Statistics
London School of Economics and Political Science

Mathematics (4 years)
University of Southampton

Mathematics and Philosophy
University of Oxford

Mathematics with International Year
University of Birmingham
We have a brilliant team of more than 60 Support Team members looking after discussions on The Student Room, helping to make it a fun, safe and useful place to hang out.
 Notnek
 charco
 Mr M
 Changing Skies
 F1's Finest
 RDKGames
 davros
 Gingerbread101
 Kvothe the Arcane
 TeeEff
 The Empire Odyssey
 Protostar
 TheConfusedMedic
 nisha.sri
 claireestelle
 Doonesbury
 furryface12
 Amefish
 Lemur14
 brainzistheword
 Sonechka
 TheAnxiousSloth
 EstelOfTheEyrie
 CoffeeAndPolitics
 Labrador99
 EmilySarah00
 thekidwhogames
 entertainmyfaith
 Eimmanuel
 Toastiekid
 CinnamonSmol
 Qer