The Student Room Group

Socialism V. Capitalism.

Scroll to see replies

Original post by TheCoolStool
Define 'work', a lot of work does not pay i.e. hobbies. If your struggling so bad start a business, your salary becomes unlimited. Furthermore I do not believe that 60% of housing tenants who do not work are unable to, you will be blown away how many people have pathetic excuses.


A recent report by the Chartered Institute of Housing.

http://www.cih.org/resources/PDF/Policy%20free%20download%20pdfs/Rethinking%20Social%20Housing%20Final%20Report.pdf

Page 13.

43 per cent of social housing tenants are working

Only 8 per cent are registered unemployed

A high proportion of tenants 28 per cent - are retired

17 per cent of people living in social housing are registered as disabled with nearly 50 per cent of all households reporting at least one member of the household suffering a long term illness or disability

58 per cent receive help with some or all of their housing costs


Page 8.

“Over 40 per cent of households in social housing are in work and contributing financially to our economy, but often on very low wages, including providing essential public services”.

You are also aware I assume that starting a business isn’t easy and requires both start-up capital, knowledge of the business they’d like to start and time to build? Tenants of social housing will rarely have the capital even if they have the knowledge, and even then, getting clients/customers can be difficult. I know because I did this myself, turning a ‘hobby’ into a job on the side.
Original post by Archurus23
No system will benefit absolutely everyone. I say capitalism. Maybe a socialist healthcare but that’s probably as far as I’ll lean to that side.


So the fire brigade, the police, the courts, the military should all be run for profit?
Original post by Gwilym101
So the fire brigade, the police, the courts, the military should all be run for profit?


Ok socialist public service. What we have now.
(edited 5 years ago)
Original post by Sulfolobus
You use a very bad example. Computers are integral to modern life but they have also helped drive the culture of idleness and sedentary behaviour both in the workplace and at home that contributes to obesity. I could also touch on loneliness, mental health problems and the environmental impact of computers. So the extent to which you regard it as an improvement depends on the angle you look at it from.
Again, people are not idle due to computers. They are lazy because they have no reason otherwise to do anything else, I could have the best computer in the world relative to me persona yet If I had self-discipline It would benefit me more than it is a disadvantage. In fact if anything its' a benefit as it makes it easier to become successful as there is less competition. People are not fat because of computers, people are fat because they DO NOT exercise enough.
Original post by qwertyK
No, not nineteen hours, mostly its more than 4. Every member of my family who needed hospital treatment required this. A further four hour wait in A&E? You need money to start a business. Not everyone has that priviliege.
So if the NHS ran for profit, and people paid for health treatment they would have enough money to meet your needs. But most people do not want to pay for healthcare therefor expect lack of capital. Yes you need money to start a business, if you don't have money there are still numerous sources from which you could get money from, bank loans, venture capitalists, crowd funding, goverment grant just to name a few.
Original post by FlintofBavaria
It just saddens me that the UK has one of the most expensive train systems and yet is one of the worst in Europe. I'm not Labour voter or a socialist, but god I hate how sub-par we are and just how willing we're accepting of it. We should have better functions trains, a better NHS and a better education system since we're supposedly one of the richest and most powerful nations in the world, for example.
What are you doing to fix this, complaining or thinking of a way and putting into action an idea?
Original post by Salostar
A recent report by the Chartered Institute of Housing.

http://www.cih.org/resources/PDF/Policy%20free%20download%20pdfs/Rethinking%20Social%20Housing%20Final%20Report.pdf

Page 13.

43 per cent of social housing tenants are working

Only 8 per cent are registered unemployed

A high proportion of tenants 28 per cent - are retired

17 per cent of people living in social housing are registered as disabled with nearly 50 per cent of all households reporting at least one member of the household suffering a long term illness or disability

58 per cent receive help with some or all of their housing costs


Page 8.

“Over 40 per cent of households in social housing are in work and contributing financially to our economy, but often on very low wages, including providing essential public services”.

You are also aware I assume that starting a business isn’t easy and requires both start-up capital, knowledge of the business they’d like to start and time to build? Tenants of social housing will rarely have the capital even if they have the knowledge, and even then, getting clients/customers can be difficult. I know because I did this myself, turning a ‘hobby’ into a job on the side.
Okay so give the ones unable to work the assistance required and those who are able to work no assistance. If you don't have the knowledge; learn. If you don't have start-up capital; get an external source of finance i.e. a bank loan. If you don't have clients or customers; work.
Original post by Gwilym101
So the fire brigade, the police, the courts, the military should all be run for profit?
Its' very important that those services make a profit otherwise they cannot function, as seen most people complain about the NHS's lack of money yet if it ran for profit problemento solvento!
Original post by TheCoolStool
Let me begin, I feel socialism does not work in the long term yet has good intent. I feel capitalism is not unethical yet some bad eggs portray it as that way and a life dedicated to improving the quality of your life (called self growth) is one of the best ways to live it. And you?


Capitalism is low key unethical. Although many people including myself believe in Social Darwinism. Socialism is really unfair against businessmen and wealthy landowners, it’s not their fault that the economies are in decline
Original post by Joservela
Capitalism is low key unethical. Although many people including myself believe in Social Darwinism. Socialism is really unfair against businessmen and wealthy landowners, it’s not their fault that the economies are in decline
Capitalism is thought to be unethical, maybe movies or gordon geckko or whatever. Most CEOs and very wealthy people have ethics, and put that before profit surprisingly.
Original post by TheCoolStool
Capitalism is thought to be unethical, maybe movies or gordon geckko or whatever. Most CEOs and very wealthy people have ethics, and put that before profit surprisingly.


Not sure about “most”. I’ve been to more than ten 3rd world countries that are capitalist based and their wealthy people don’t seem to have ethics. Maybe in wealthy nations CEOs tend to be more ethical but we should bring up smaller nations too.
Reply 31
Socialism gives all the power to the government, which historically has given a 100% success rate in producing totalitarian regimes.

Stalinism, Maoism, Chavismo etc
(edited 5 years ago)
Here is an interesting article pertaining to this topic. I can understand why a socialist economy is attractive to some people, but I just don't know if it is sustainable in the long run.

https://fee.org/articles/why-socialism-failed/
I’d rather live in a society that’s unfair that breeds competency. Than a society that’s fair but breeds complacency any day of the week.

Whether that’s capitalism, socialism etc I don’t care
Original post by TheCoolStool
Again, people are not idle due to computers. They are lazy because they have no reason otherwise to do anything else, I could have the best computer in the world relative to me persona yet If I had self-discipline It would benefit me more than it is a disadvantage. In fact if anything its' a benefit as it makes it easier to become successful as there is less competition. People are not fat because of computers, people are fat because they DO NOT exercise enough.


Evidently you are struggling here.

A quick examination of a modern capitalist society such as the UK reveals a nation of fatties (64% of adults in England) with very low levels of activity, which, by your own admission, is related to laziness. It is a trend seen in other developed capitalist nations, it is also seen when developing nations embrace capitalism (the explosion of obesity in Chinese cities for example).

Therefore the characteristics which you have variously cited as being associated with capitalism such self-improvement, hard work, and self-discipline are not present in capitalist societies.

Yes, capitalism has done wonders for increasing material wealth, but it has also turned us into a nation of lazy gluttonous consumers. That there is so much self-denial around this fact is to our detriment. Although it does create wonderful business opportunities for undertakers specialising in XXL coffins.
Capitalism is a system that distinguishes the strong from the weak. We need to remove the mixed economy we have at present and embrace true capitalism. It is good for the species to eliminate the weak.
Original post by Joservela
Not sure about “most”. I’ve been to more than ten 3rd world countries that are capitalist based and their wealthy people don’t seem to have ethics. Maybe in wealthy nations CEOs tend to be more ethical but we should bring up smaller nations too.
Totally agree.
Original post by morc13
Socialism gives all the power to the government, which historically has given a 100% success rate in producing totalitarian regimes.

Stalinism, Maoism, Chavismo etc
Give me one country where a left wing ideology has worked in the long term.
Original post by Sulfolobus
Evidently you are struggling here.

A quick examination of a modern capitalist society such as the UK reveals a nation of fatties (64% of adults in England) with very low levels of activity, which, by your own admission, is related to laziness. It is a trend seen in other developed capitalist nations, it is also seen when developing nations embrace capitalism (the explosion of obesity in Chinese cities for example).

Therefore the characteristics which you have variously cited as being associated with capitalism such self-improvement, hard work, and self-discipline are not present in capitalist societies.

Yes, capitalism has done wonders for increasing material wealth, but it has also turned us into a nation of lazy gluttonous consumers. That there is so much self-denial around this fact is to our detriment. Although it does create wonderful business opportunities for undertakers specialising in XXL coffins.
Capitalism in of itself does not cause obesity, sure when companies release products that can cause obesity the undisciplined indefinitely will become obese. The more disciplined indefinitely will not. If we were a socialist country there would still be and yet to be obese people, therefor the solution is not to abolish capitalism the problem lies within the people themselves, the fact you are trying to place the blame on obesity over to capitalism is rather idiotic, as stated; people become fat because they EAT too much. Left wing ideas nor do right wing ideas force people to eat a certain way, It is there fault if they die in a XXL coffin, there are numerous businesses offering healthy products yet they decided to go for the unhealthy option over and over again, the business did not force them to do that. They CHOSE to do that, can't you understand a simple concept?
Original post by cook a tootle
Capitalism is a system that distinguishes the strong from the weak. We need to remove the mixed economy we have at present and embrace true capitalism. It is good for the species to eliminate the weak.
Darwin's theory of evolution, if anything Capitalism is natural and benefits the homo-sapien species.

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending