Last edited by nikki haley; 5 months ago
The lower classes are the only ones knocking out children in anywhere near the numbers we need.
Is he suggesting we give up totally and outsource the replenishinment of our population completely to immigrants?
I think we should be told. 😁
Since when did unemployed = chav?
Global population growth is already slowing down though. You can even see that on the graph. It's easy to think linearly when you see such population charts but it is not the case that it will continue to rise at a high rate forever.
Posted on the TSR App. Download from Apple
or Google Play
Last edited by Sinnoh; 5 months ago
Ok this is the very definiton of 'fake news' the MP said that people should not have children they cannot provide for. I disagree with the statement but to cast a net out to sea and claim you've found a shark instead of a salmon is dishonest.
Secondly being unemployed and being a chav are not the same thing, a great number of people are unemployed who previously had employment but are out of it for some reason, mentally ill people may be unemployed, special needed people, the elderly, the infirm and sick, people who hold peculiar political views and don't want to participate in the system etc.
Thirdly yes chavs should be able to breed as we live in a liberal society where we do not arbitrarily restrict reproductive rights.
Finally, chavs are indeed terrible people, they litter, start fights, create noise pollution, set fire to bins and cause probably about 80 per cent of petty crime.
The chav bashing on here is shameful.
If we're going to consider the sterilisation of Britain's underclass, why not consider sterilising all supposed "refugees". Both ideas are far-fetched and immoral perhaps (not really) but they are worth discussing.
I think Europe should've implemented this policy. All young, fit, virile unmarried men over the age of 18 submit themselves for mandatory sterilisation (NOT castration) if they wish to become a citizen of that country. I specify unmarried men because married men (especially those with kids) have more financial obligations (in theory) and are less likely to engage in crime. The burden of fatherhood will force them to become tax-paying citizens.
Why not just ban them outright? The limp-wristed politicians and the bleeding heart altruists get to sleep well at night while the indigenous population can at least take comfort in the knowledge that the interlopers won't replicate to the point of unsustainability. Many men will be disgusted at the prospect of having their fertility stripped from them and may be willling to return to their country of origin.
There is of course the problem of all those untethered, nihilistic men with little to live for running amok but at least they will die off without reproducing. It's always darkest before the dawn (no racial pun intended lol)
Obviously I didn't put much thought into this idea but I think I'm on to something.
Btw, this isn't about ethnic cleansing, I'm mixed myself lol
Yes, they should. Culled even.
The people here defending chavs probably didn't grow up in an environment where they had to deal with them in school or work.