Trump recorded discussing payoffs to prostitutes to keep silent

Meaning he is a liar, a cheat and an overall shady character. So are his party members who claim to support "family values" (which means 1950s hypocrisy, in reality).

He wouldnt actually know as he is just the lawyer.
His complaint seems to be it isnt the original, but only a copy.
Copies are often used an I cant see the issue.

He would have to come up with some evidence it was doctored.
I cant see the issue really? Are you saying the conversation never took place and no payment was made to buy the story?
There was no affair and Karen McDougall has made it all up?

No. The lawyer would know just about all there is to know without him actually being present when the events took place. He is privy to far more than any of us.

I'm saying before jumping to conclusions one should allow due process to take place. With the establishment against Trump you can be sure they will throw the book at him if they could.

So everybody calm down, don't be like cats jumping around at the laser pointer dot whenever the media types want to rile up the public. Leave animosity behind and use your brains even when talking about trump. After all, thinking is what separates us from animals.

Then isn't it fortunate that he was hired in the capacity of a president and not a husband.

I don't care who he screws as long as its legal and isn't causing physical harm to anyone. Any man who takes special offence to that is probably jealous they aren't getting laid with the quality of women they'd like to.

He only knows what the client tells him
The lawyer wasnt there.
He isnt an expert on whether the evidence has been tampered with or not. and he has no proof.

The defence of it not being the original is ridiculous. As you could object to any evidence for it not being the original. If he wants to argue in court then he would be free to do so and they could call in tampering experts.

It would be for the court to decide.

The establishment arent against Trump he is part of it and filling the supreme court with his appointees.

You are just making yourself look silly.

Trump hasnt denied the payment as far as I know.. Are you saying the conversation never existed?

Honestly dont care but in your eagerness to defend him your defence is ridiculous. experts and the court will determine whether the evidence is credible..

Dishonesty is a personal attribute. If he lies about his affairs and pays women to cover them up it says something about his character.

I'm not a man but don't see what other men would be jealous of; he gets laid because he pays for it. It would make more sense to be jealous of someone who gets laid because women are actually attracted to him.

It's also hypocritical to be conservative in some areas for the sake of "Christian family values" but brush it off when your leader doesn't adhere to these. That's pretty much the whole Republican Party right now.

Dishonesty is a personal attribute. If he lies about his affairs and pays women to cover them up it says something about his character.

I'm not a man but don't see what other men would be jealous of; he gets laid because he pays for it. It would make more sense to be jealous of someone who gets laid because women are actually attracted to him.

It's also hypocritical to be conservative in some areas for the sake of "Christian family values" but brush it off when your leader doesn't adhere to these. That's pretty much the whole Republican Party right now.

D

Bet you didn't attack Harvey Weinstein or Kevin Spacey or any of the other countless Hollywood pervs nearly as vehemently as you attack trump.

You leftists are effing retarded. Did you know Trumps Hollywood star was destroyed but Spacey's has not. Let that sink in .....

Can you defend Trump without resorting to whataboutism and childish name-calling? It appears not. Trump supporters are a fragile bunch.

Look you idiot, before attacking someone you need to prove a crime in a court. In this case there is no crime ... if and when there is a crime proven I will support you and attack trump. in the meantime, I refuse to give in to blind hatred ... something you seem to have in abundance.

You seem quite emotional for someone who claims to be impartially waiting for a court verdict....

I couldn't give a rats arse about your eagerness to attack him.

WTF you on about, there's no crime so what court can there be. You leftists make me sick.

Not attacking him, pointing out the fact your defence is flawed and makes non sense.
You just make yourself look silly.as you have lost the argument.

If true, then the significance would be:

1. He would be classed as a womaniser and cheater on Melania just whilst she was giving birth, which may not matter to you, but might to some of the more traditional religious voters.

2. Undisclosed payments to bury embarrassing stories about a political candidate can be treated as a violation of US campaign finance laws.

Those are the issues.. You dont have to like or dislike him to recognise that to be correct.

Those are all non issues for President.
He's not a pope you know?

You mean powerful men with money like to have sex with beautiful women? Jesus...

If he has broken election finance laws then ofc it will reflect on him.
If his religious voters decide not to vote for him because he is unfaithful and a liar, then they are the people who helped elect him to power.

If you dont think breaking the law and public perception is important, then you have issues and just shows how unable you are to see the issues.

Are you a campaign finance lawyer ?
You obviously are not so put a sock in it cos you're talking crap.

I think it in inaccurate to call Karen Mcdougal a prostitute. She had an affair with him for ten months.

How about Trumps lawyer, he'd know. Doubt you'll see this on CNN.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/07/28/giuliani-says-experts-think-someone-messed-with-cohen-tape.html