Go to first unread
Back
to top
Subject Knowledge Enhancement Courses MEGATHREAD
Watch this thread
Rachgriffs
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#61
Report
#61
(Original post by mathsandmadness)
Hey! QTS lets you teach anything, including primary and some colleges. However, it is unlikely you would be given a job in an area you are not trained in (why would they?).
Do you have an AS level in maths? This is accepted by a lot of providers, but you'd need to call them and ask. I don't know what the situation is with the foundation thing - I expect you'd still be accepted by some but they can be particular about AS and A levels. Again, call and check with the providers you're interested in.
Do the SKE in person, not online. Without a related degree, this will help with employment (and confidence) if you choose maths.
My background is history and I'd love to teach both. Although, it is easier to teach a related subject (ie STEM or economics or something). It really depends on where the school is desperate for staff, and how many part timers they employ, and a whole host of other things.
I hope to teach physics and maths at some stage, but history would be a bonus. First few years tho, really better to stick to one. I know a lot of teachers that say it is tough, even for experienced teachers, to switch between subjects. It adds a big time commitment. Good thing to offer up at interviews, tho!
(Currently doing the pg myself) I don't think it will hold me back finding a job, but it might make it harder if there's lots of people with full maths degrees applying, or some private/high attaining schools
Hope this helps!
Hey! QTS lets you teach anything, including primary and some colleges. However, it is unlikely you would be given a job in an area you are not trained in (why would they?).
Do you have an AS level in maths? This is accepted by a lot of providers, but you'd need to call them and ask. I don't know what the situation is with the foundation thing - I expect you'd still be accepted by some but they can be particular about AS and A levels. Again, call and check with the providers you're interested in.
Do the SKE in person, not online. Without a related degree, this will help with employment (and confidence) if you choose maths.
My background is history and I'd love to teach both. Although, it is easier to teach a related subject (ie STEM or economics or something). It really depends on where the school is desperate for staff, and how many part timers they employ, and a whole host of other things.
I hope to teach physics and maths at some stage, but history would be a bonus. First few years tho, really better to stick to one. I know a lot of teachers that say it is tough, even for experienced teachers, to switch between subjects. It adds a big time commitment. Good thing to offer up at interviews, tho!
(Currently doing the pg myself) I don't think it will hold me back finding a job, but it might make it harder if there's lots of people with full maths degrees applying, or some private/high attaining schools
Hope this helps!
I have a call with a teacher training advisor in a couple of weeks, so will be speaking with them.
I did think that QTS allowed you teach anything, which would mean I should then be able to teach both English and maths, but obviously would depend on if I got accepted to do maths.
I believe a local university offer the SKE in maths, although I don’t think my current one do, so I will look into it.
Oh, the first few years I would stick with one while I settled and understood the job. It’s just thinking long term.
I know there usually is a shortage with maths, so hoping this may go in favour, but then again that depends at the time.
Thank you
0
reply
SarcAndSpark
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#62
(Original post by mathsandmadness)
Online is fine, yes. It's easier financially. The in-person are better, particularly if it's been some time since last using the knowledge.
What do you mean by better known? They will be well aware of the in-person courses as there aren't as many, and they are generally regarded as of a more consistent standard, where as online can vary dramatically
Online is fine, yes. It's easier financially. The in-person are better, particularly if it's been some time since last using the knowledge.
What do you mean by better known? They will be well aware of the in-person courses as there aren't as many, and they are generally regarded as of a more consistent standard, where as online can vary dramatically
There are two main online providers of SKEs- Vidlearn and TES. Both of these are well know by unis, and use the same resources year on year, so will vary considerably less than an in person course. Many providers won't have experience of people attending an in person course, as they're restricted to certain locations.
Most providers will recommend either Vidlearn or TES to people they've asked to take an SKE.
1
reply
mathsandmadness
Badges:
2
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#63
Report
#63
(Original post by SarcAndSpark)
The idea that in person is better is solely your opinion. It's not a view shared by unis or employers.
There are two main online providers of SKEs- Vidlearn and TES. Both of these are well know by unis, and use the same resources year on year, so will vary considerably less than an in person course. Many providers won't have experience of people attending an in person course, as they're restricted to certain locations.
Most providers will recommend either Vidlearn or TES to people they've asked to take an SKE.
The idea that in person is better is solely your opinion. It's not a view shared by unis or employers.
There are two main online providers of SKEs- Vidlearn and TES. Both of these are well know by unis, and use the same resources year on year, so will vary considerably less than an in person course. Many providers won't have experience of people attending an in person course, as they're restricted to certain locations.
Most providers will recommend either Vidlearn or TES to people they've asked to take an SKE.
Nothing against online. I enjoy remote learning. My point being, if finances dictate, then go online. But you'd be hard pushed to find many providers who say it is better. The fact that they are better known is your opinion. But yes, they are fine.
Last edited by mathsandmadness; 1 year ago
0
reply
HealthyMaths
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#64
Report
#64
(Original post by traineemaths123)
Anyone doing a SKE course with Eureka? Doing a 16 week maths SKE but not sure what the assessments and what the content are going to be focused on. Feel free to message me!
Anyone doing a SKE course with Eureka? Doing a 16 week maths SKE but not sure what the assessments and what the content are going to be focused on. Feel free to message me!
I’m also in the position where I am due to begin an initial teacher training course in mathematics this September, on condition that I successfully complete a twelve-week SKE first. I’ve narrowed my preferred choice down to Vidlearn and Eureka from the SKE course providers list. Can I ask what persuaded you to go for Eureka instead of Vidlearn? Any help/advice that you can provide me with would be most appreciated. Many thanks in advance.
0
reply
traineemaths123
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#65
Report
#65
(Original post by HealthyMaths)
Hi there
I’m also in the position where I am due to begin an initial teacher training course in mathematics this September, on condition that I successfully complete a twelve-week SKE first. I’ve narrowed my preferred choice down to Vidlearn and Eureka from the SKE course providers list. Can I ask what persuaded you to go for Eureka instead of Vidlearn? Any help/advice that you can provide me with would be most appreciated. Many thanks in advance.
Hi there
I’m also in the position where I am due to begin an initial teacher training course in mathematics this September, on condition that I successfully complete a twelve-week SKE first. I’ve narrowed my preferred choice down to Vidlearn and Eureka from the SKE course providers list. Can I ask what persuaded you to go for Eureka instead of Vidlearn? Any help/advice that you can provide me with would be most appreciated. Many thanks in advance.
0
reply
HealthyMaths
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#66
Report
#66
(Original post by traineemaths123)
Hii I saw a lot of feedback about the assessment side of Vidlearn which was just considered to be very intense and the workload way too much. Having to do tedious reflective summary of modules, summary of modules in a form of a presentation, extended multiple choice assessments. I work a full time job and I felt like Eureka was a more thoughtful approach to teaching maths holistically and the mathematical content. Hope that helps, let me know which one you decide
Hii I saw a lot of feedback about the assessment side of Vidlearn which was just considered to be very intense and the workload way too much. Having to do tedious reflective summary of modules, summary of modules in a form of a presentation, extended multiple choice assessments. I work a full time job and I felt like Eureka was a more thoughtful approach to teaching maths holistically and the mathematical content. Hope that helps, let me know which one you decide
Thank you for your reply - I greatly appreciate the effort that you have made in responding to my post. I’ve heard similar things about the Vidlearn assessments. Do you have any information on Eureka and how they carry out assessments on their SKE course for mathematics? Thanks again in advance.
0
reply
traineemaths123
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#67
Report
#67
When I spoke to the advisors, they said a lot of the assessments are self reflective about the modules and reflective of being in the role of a maths teacher. An example they gave me is that you could be set an assignment of how you would teach a certain topic to a class in the form of a presentation or something similar
0
reply
HealthyMaths
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#68
Report
#68
(Original post by traineemaths123)
When I spoke to the advisors, they said a lot of the assessments are self reflective about the modules and reflective of being in the role of a maths teacher. An example they gave me is that you could be set an assignment of how you would teach a certain topic to a class in the form of a presentation or something similar
When I spoke to the advisors, they said a lot of the assessments are self reflective about the modules and reflective of being in the role of a maths teacher. An example they gave me is that you could be set an assignment of how you would teach a certain topic to a class in the form of a presentation or something similar
0
reply
traineemaths123
Badges:
9
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#69
Report
#69
(Original post by HealthyMaths)
I can definitely see the appeal of completing the course with Eureka. It’s very difficult to make a decision to be honest, as I think that both of the course providers have many strong points. Overall though, I’m leaning more towards the Vidlearn option. They just seem to approach things in a more thorough and comprehensive way, which should give me more confidence once I begin my initial teacher training. I do appreciate that it comes down to individual choice and that people will have their own individual circumstances to consider. Best of luck on your chosen course anyway and thanks again for your comments.
I can definitely see the appeal of completing the course with Eureka. It’s very difficult to make a decision to be honest, as I think that both of the course providers have many strong points. Overall though, I’m leaning more towards the Vidlearn option. They just seem to approach things in a more thorough and comprehensive way, which should give me more confidence once I begin my initial teacher training. I do appreciate that it comes down to individual choice and that people will have their own individual circumstances to consider. Best of luck on your chosen course anyway and thanks again for your comments.
0
reply
LocosFrijoles
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#70
Report
#70
I'm currently doing a 16 week Maths SKE through Vidlearn, and I'm finding it really useful! It's been many years since I did maths at school or undergrad.
As it's a Maths SKE I should be receiving a bursary. However, the bursary conditions apparently require me to do 25 hours a week over 16 weeks for a total of 400 hours. I've started going through the work and I'm progressing quicker than the expected time allotment. If I complete the SKE early while doing 25 hours a week will I receive a partial bursary? Or if I work less hours a week than 25, but meet all my deadlines over the 16 weeks will that also mean I only get a partial bursary?
As it's a Maths SKE I should be receiving a bursary. However, the bursary conditions apparently require me to do 25 hours a week over 16 weeks for a total of 400 hours. I've started going through the work and I'm progressing quicker than the expected time allotment. If I complete the SKE early while doing 25 hours a week will I receive a partial bursary? Or if I work less hours a week than 25, but meet all my deadlines over the 16 weeks will that also mean I only get a partial bursary?
0
reply
Mathsie
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#71
Report
#71
(Original post by HealthyMaths)
I can definitely see the appeal of completing the course with Eureka. It’s very difficult to make a decision to be honest, as I think that both of the course providers have many strong points. Overall though, I’m leaning more towards the Vidlearn option. They just seem to approach things in a more thorough and comprehensive way, which should give me more confidence once I begin my initial teacher training. I do appreciate that it comes down to individual choice and that people will have their own individual circumstances to consider. Best of luck on your chosen course anyway and thanks again for your comments.
I can definitely see the appeal of completing the course with Eureka. It’s very difficult to make a decision to be honest, as I think that both of the course providers have many strong points. Overall though, I’m leaning more towards the Vidlearn option. They just seem to approach things in a more thorough and comprehensive way, which should give me more confidence once I begin my initial teacher training. I do appreciate that it comes down to individual choice and that people will have their own individual circumstances to consider. Best of luck on your chosen course anyway and thanks again for your comments.
0
reply
judbar
Badges:
2
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#72
Report
#72
(Original post by LocosFrijoles)
I'm currently doing a 16 week Maths SKE through Vidlearn, and I'm finding it really useful! It's been many years since I did maths at school or undergrad.
As it's a Maths SKE I should be receiving a bursary. However, the bursary conditions apparently require me to do 25 hours a week over 16 weeks for a total of 400 hours. I've started going through the work and I'm progressing quicker than the expected time allotment. If I complete the SKE early while doing 25 hours a week will I receive a partial bursary? Or if I work less hours a week than 25, but meet all my deadlines over the 16 weeks will that also mean I only get a partial bursary?
I'm currently doing a 16 week Maths SKE through Vidlearn, and I'm finding it really useful! It's been many years since I did maths at school or undergrad.
As it's a Maths SKE I should be receiving a bursary. However, the bursary conditions apparently require me to do 25 hours a week over 16 weeks for a total of 400 hours. I've started going through the work and I'm progressing quicker than the expected time allotment. If I complete the SKE early while doing 25 hours a week will I receive a partial bursary? Or if I work less hours a week than 25, but meet all my deadlines over the 16 weeks will that also mean I only get a partial bursary?
0
reply
zonova
Badges:
2
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#73
Report
#73
Hi, I was planning on applying for the 8 week SKE in Chemistry with VidLearn. Does anyone know if through just the 8 week course that we get access to the A-level material in addition to the GCSE content? Just wondering if I could access it but wouldn't be directly assessed on it.
0
reply
livcaldwell97
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#74
Report
#74
Has anyone completed the A level Chemistry vid learn course who would be willing to share an example of their assignments? I am struggling on where to start as I've been working 3 jobs this year and only now have begun seriously working for the SKE due in September
0
reply
SarcAndSpark
Badges:
20
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#75
(Original post by livcaldwell97)
Has anyone completed the A level Chemistry vid learn course who would be willing to share an example of their assignments? I am struggling on where to start as I've been working 3 jobs this year and only now have begun seriously working for the SKE due in September
Has anyone completed the A level Chemistry vid learn course who would be willing to share an example of their assignments? I am struggling on where to start as I've been working 3 jobs this year and only now have begun seriously working for the SKE due in September
I did the biology one a few years back now. I would say you can get through each assignment more quickly than they suggest BUT you may struggle to get a 16 week course done in 3-4 weeks, unfortunately. I understand it's really difficult, though.
I *may* have access to some of my old assignments for biology if that would be helpful?
0
reply
arpat
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#76
Report
#76
Hi,I complete the chemistry SKE back in 2020 and am currently teaching Physics also now that I have completed my training. Did anyone complete the SKE physics as any knowledge would be greatly appreciated.
0
reply
emmad28
Badges:
3
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#77
Report
#77
I'm going to be doing a SKE with TES. Anyone else done one and got any feedback/advice?
0
reply
marylandcookie
Badges:
1
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#78
Report
#78
Anyone still have any resources etc they used for their computer science ske? I have an 8 week ske coming up in may and wanted to get ahead - mentally 🙂
0
reply
X
Quick Reply
