The Student Room Group

Guys are the maths leaks true?

202 for a grade 9??? I’m shook
Reply 1
hope so cos they said you need a 17% in higher for a pass
where , link where it is said.
Yes they are - a guy on the main thread confirmed it.
Seems plausible
Original post by New Wonder
Yes they are - a guy on the main thread confirmed it.

Can I get a link

He confirmed they’re fake. I was asking if they were real. (Thanks though hope they’re fake)

Edit: chicken head can’t be right, the boundaries are in the same format as 2017 ones https://qualifications.pearson.com/content/dam/pdf/Support/Grade-boundaries/GCSE/1706-gcse-9-1-grade-boundaries-v1.pdf
(edited 5 years ago)
yep its true , my maths teacher said its 202
tbh i think its real, a random guy on twitter a few hours ago said that his teacher showed him that its 202 for a 9, i dont think its a coincidence that later on someone else says that its 202
For maths, it seems plausible. The source where the figure was extracted from may well be faux, but the number of marks it sated seems pretty accurate.

Quick Reply

Latest