Second referendum for brexit a saviour

tampered with ... by Oxford analytics

The first referendum is invalid because of Oxford Analytics tampering with the results.

Turning to China after EU kicks out will only aggravate the situation as instead of the quality products we used to import from EU we will end up importing low quality junk from China. Also, when UK becomes a second Greece and collapses economically EU will not rush to our help this time. In addition, UK is running out of oil and will need Russia for supply but Russia will be on the side of EU specially as conservative government has antagonised Russia. If UK was a large country with advanced industry and strong economy like USA or Russia then it might have somewhat survived the consequences of brexit. To make matters worse, Scotland is seeking independence and aims to stay in EU which will reduce UK to just a very small country. Labour who is fully aware of all of these facts must act more proactively to oust the Tories before they comoletely destroy the economy and put everyone below breadline. Situation is so bad already that three million properties are being used as shares accommodation and homelessness is becoming so rampant. Situation looks too dire already!

And if a second referendum fails to deliver the right result we just need to keep them coming until the original one is reversed!

Pathetic . Its an unwritten rule that a referendum decides the countries intent and mandate ....not two or three until you get it right . A second referendum is never going to happen . The end .

The country has spoken .

Personally, I think a Brexit deal should have been negotiated before the referendum, and we should then have voted stay or leave based on the deal offered. To have been asked to vote based on something that even the most political among us couldn't possibly understand - due to not being given enough/accurate information - is unfair and ridiculous.

I don't think there should be repeat referendums if people just aren't happy with the result, however I think in this case people were so misguided on the approach to the previous referendum, it would make sense to put together proper information for people to read, and then repeat the process. It would have to be an unbiased summary of what each choice would mean.. although I'm not sure that is even achievable to be honest.

Not one word of that was true.

No. 32% of the country has spoken. And most of them only wanted to get rid of the bloody immigrants turning Britain into a sharia state taking our jobs have you seen them down the high street hanging's too good for them would you like one living next door to you it's not what we fought two World Wars for I like a curry as much as the next man but...

They live a normal life It's landrovers ..it's youth clubs. ..it's rugby ...it's football ....it's all things Britain and should be preserved for its cultural identity. Millions of immigrants have flooded in and the counary is full to bursting . .

There are not enough houses schools or hospitals and the indigenous types have had enough . No more ...no more

one thing I take issue too, is the idea that "people voted brxit, but now they see the economic effects, they will vote remain!"

- its incredibly stupid an untrue.

If there is one lesson to learn from the first referendum, its that people who voted leave fall into two catagories:

A, those that don't give a **** about the economy..
B, those that want to radically change our economy in the long-term

Neither of those catagories will have changed their mind..

group A. are largely working class, and feel like they have very little to loose.. they are motivated by: immigration, nationalism, and principle first.. rather than practical reason. They want less immigration, and more control over our laws and our own country - even if it makes us a bit poorer. They don't care if your house prices go down, or if a few middle class people loose a bit of savings.. they already feel like have already lost so much due to mass immigration, that they no longer give a ****. They were shouted at for months last time tha they would be poorer.. they would be worse off.. they would loose thousands a year.. etc. etc. - and they didn't give a ****. They voted for it anyway.

group B. are more radical, they are upper-class and middle class individuals who want more gloablisaiton, not less. They are actually uposed to group A, but tolerate them to get where they want.. they want extreme open boarder policies, global free trade, low tax economic policy etc. They know that in the short term, they will loose out economically, but they believe that in the long-run things will work out better for the UK if they follow the model they advocate for.

-- the remain side will loose the refendum for a second time, if it makes it all about economics and money. It tried that again and again the first time, and if they still haven't realised that that is not how you will ever win this vote.. then they deserve to loose again and again.

Not gonna happen son.

Leave may win by an even bigger margin.

It would rely on the proportion of the electorate actually voting this time. The majority of the people who didn't vote were from the demographics that mostly voted Remain.

What was that you said about "living in the real world"?

Perhaps not racism, but certainly xenophobia. There are probably more immigrants working in most hospitals than there are being treated in them.

The referendum was legally only an advisory process. The government is not obliged to carry out the result. It