# AQA AS Physics Unit 3 - EMF

Watch
#1
Incredibly annoying question which I just don't know how to approach. (may be hard to convey without the diagram, but I'll try. I have written solutions to the questions I have already completed.)

a) A cell of emf and internal resistance r is connected in series to a resistor of resistance R as shown. A current I flows in the circuit.
(Shows standard series circuit with said components.)

i) State an expression which gives in terms of I, r, and R.

ii) Hence show how , the p.d. across the resistor, is related to , I and r.

b) A lamp, rated at 30W, is connected to a 120V supply.
i) Calculate the current in the lamp.

ii) If the resistor in part (a) is replaced by the lamp described in part (b), determine how many cells, each of emf 1.5V and internal resistance 1.2, would have to be connected in series so that the lamp would operate and its proper power.
R of lamp =

Number of cells = , which is quite clearly a ridiculous figure, so there must be a hole in my understanding somewhere... would anybody care to fill it? This question has been getting at me all day long.
0
13 years ago
#2
(Original post by Hedgeman49)
Incredibly annoying question which I just don't know how to approach. (may be hard to convey without the diagram, but I'll try. I have written solutions to the questions I have already completed.)

a) A cell of emf and internal resistance r is connected in series to a resistor of resistance R as shown. A current I flows in the circuit.
(Shows standard series circuit with said components.)

i) State an expression which gives in terms of I, r, and R.

ii) Hence show how , the p.d. across the resistor, is related to , I and r.

b) A lamp, rated at 30W, is connected to a 120V supply.
i) Calculate the current in the lamp.

ii) If the resistor in part (a) is replaced by the lamp described in part (b), determine how many cells, each of emf 1.5V and internal resistance 1.2, would have to be connected in series so that the lamp would operate and its proper power.
R of lamp =

Number of cells = , which is quite clearly a ridiculous figure, so there must be a hole in my understanding somewhere... would anybody care to fill it? This question has been getting at me all day long.
You need I think:

and solve for n where n is the number of cells (I get n=100)
0
13 years ago
#3
I'm not too confident on electricity, but ...
P = IV
30 = I(E - Ir)k, where k is the number of cells.
30 = 0.25(1.5 - 0.25 x 1.2)k, and solve...

However, there is a large chance I am wrong.
0
13 years ago
#4
(Original post by Glutamic Acid)
I'm not too confident on electricity, but ...
P = IV
30 = I(E - Ir)k, where k is the number of cells.
30 = 0.25(1.5 - 0.25 x 1.2)k, and solve...

However, there is a large chance I am wrong.
no you're right, it gives the same answer. I just did it in such a way as to follow on from the working already there.
0
#5
Cool, thanks a lot guys. Feel kinda ashamed I didn't spot that one! Bit of a stupid question if you ask me... who would put 100 cells in a circuit?
0
13 years ago
#6
(Original post by Hedgeman49)
who would put 100 cells in a circuit?
An AQA exam writer.
1
13 years ago
#7
true, a big number or not, it's always encouraging when you come out with nice round numbers
0
13 years ago
#8
Indeed.
0
1 year ago
#9
thanks
0
1 year ago
#10
thanks - tara
0
1 year ago
#11
thanks
0
X

new posts
Back
to top
Latest
My Feed

### Oops, nobody has postedin the last few hours.

Why not re-start the conversation?

see more

### See more of what you like onThe Student Room

You can personalise what you see on TSR. Tell us a little about yourself to get started.

### Poll

Join the discussion

#### Who is winning Euro 2020

France (70)
28.34%
England (83)
33.6%
Belgium (20)
8.1%
Germany (30)
12.15%
Spain (3)
1.21%
Italy (17)
6.88%
Netherlands (7)
2.83%
Other (Tell us who) (17)
6.88%