Turn on thread page Beta
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    Hi all

    I need to write an essay on how the Charities Act 2011 and has affected the law, and especially the notion of 'public benefit'. I do not know where to start and I could really use some guidance here.

    Thank you.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    Start by reading the 2011 Act. This is key.

    Follow up by reading some articles. My lecturer wrote a very good article on this. This area of law is case heavy (per CAs4(3)), and you should consider the trade-off as your key focus: tax benefits which the charity earns by being for the public good.

    Courts get quite "judgey" in doing this, e.g. Denning and Scientology and Hopkins and Francis Bacon as Shakespeare and the mediums in Hummeltenberg (if you met a medium subscribing judge, mightn't they be inclined to say a medium school is beneficial?). Note SC in Hodkin pushing back against being too "judgey" about religious beliefs. Virgo being a snobby shite about darts. So maybe it is best to just see if the purpose is on the list and leave it at that (e.g. Chitty in Fauveaux (versus HL in Anti-Vivi); and Greene MR). Problem highlighted in the McGovern case vs the Bowman case; courts unwilling to get into a political role.

    But be wary. The charity lot are known for being rather ponderous in their articles.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Notoriety)
    Start by reading the 2011 Act. This is key.

    Follow up by reading some articles. My lecturer wrote a very good article on this. This area of law is case heavy (per CAs4(3)), and you should consider the trade-off as your key focus: tax benefits which the charity earns by being for the public good.

    Courts get quite "judgey" in doing this, e.g. Denning and Scientology and Hopkins and Francis Bacon as Shakespeare and the mediums in Hummeltenberg (if you met a medium subscribing judge, mightn't they be inclined to say a medium school is beneficial?). Note SC in Hodkin pushing back against being too "judgey" about religious beliefs. Virgo being a snobby shite about darts. So maybe it is best to just see if the purpose is on the list and leave it at that (e.g. Chitty in Fauveaux (versus HL in Anti-Vivi); and Greene MR). Problem highlighted in the McGovern case vs the Bowman case; courts unwilling to get into a political role.

    But be wary. The charity lot are known for being rather ponderous in their articles.
    This gives me a good start. Thank you taking the time.
    Offline

    21
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by legalbeagle1990)
    This gives me a good start. Thank you taking the time.
    No worries.

    Tudor on Charities is the most authoritative text out there in this area of law, so I would check that out.
    • Thread Starter
    Offline

    5
    ReputationRep:
    (Original post by Notoriety)
    No worries.

    Tudor on Charities is the most authoritative text out there in this area of law, so I would check that out.
    I don't have to write an essay per se, but rather answer an essay question in a mock exam. Just trying to commit an essay plan to memory.
 
 
 
Reply
Submit reply
Turn on thread page Beta
Updated: November 9, 2018

University open days

  • Southampton Solent University
    All faculties Undergraduate
    Sun, 18 Nov '18
  • University of Bradford
    All faculties Undergraduate
    Wed, 21 Nov '18
  • Buckinghamshire New University
    All Faculties Postgraduate
    Wed, 21 Nov '18
Poll
Black Friday: Yay or Nay?

The Student Room, Get Revising and Marked by Teachers are trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd.

Register Number: 04666380 (England and Wales), VAT No. 806 8067 22 Registered Office: International House, Queens Road, Brighton, BN1 3XE

Write a reply...
Reply
Hide
Reputation gems: You get these gems as you gain rep from other members for making good contributions and giving helpful advice.