(Original post by SHallowvale)
Asia has applied for asylum in Europe instead of the hundreds of other safe countries around the world. Europe, with our lucrative benefits, and not East Asia, South America, Africa, etc. She sounds just like an "economic migrant", at least on the terms of those such as yourself.
Stop pretending like you care about her wellbeing. You don't.
The only reason you care about this story is because the victim is Christian and it enables you the opportunity to complain about refugees currently in Europe. Forgive me if I'm wrong but I don't recall any outcry from you when thousands of Muslims were either killed or force to abandon their homes last year (and still to this day) in Burma. No calls for us to accept them as refugees.
You would think that Muslim nations would be the first to be queueing up to take in lots of Rohingya. But they're not, are they? At least they could give generously to Bangladesh to shelter them in political safety until the situation is resolved.
As for Asia Bibi, no, there aren't "hundreds" of suitable countries. Clearly no Muslim-majority country will do (besides the point just made that they typically don't take many refugees). Nor in fact will any with a large Muslim minority (e.g. Ethiopia where it's one-third). Nor any where e.g. Boko Haram or Al-Shabaab are active in terrorism. Nor other African countries with civil war (CAR, DRC). Nor China which is constantly imprisoning Christian pastors. See, the list of possible destinations is already diminishing fast.
You'd think Latin America might be an option, but which LA country has actually offered? I haven't heard of any. Whereas several European countries, plus Canada and Australia, have already stepped up to the plate. In these circumstances, what do you expect to happen?
Let the last word (for now) go to Pakistan chief justice Asif Saeed Khosa: "The image of Islam we are showing to the world gives me much grief and sorrow." I'd like to see a few self-identifying Muslims on TSR go on record here to agree.